Endoscopy 2017; 49(S 01): E18-E20
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-120290
E-Videos
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic diagnosis of antral webs in children

Julia Fritz
1   Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
,
Alfonso Martinez
1   Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
,
Marjorie Arca
2   Department of Pediatric General Surgery, Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
,
Diana Lerner
1   Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 January 2017 (online)

An antral web is a rare cause of obstructive symptoms with an unknown prevalence. It was first described in children in 1957, and there remains limited description of these anatomic anomalies in the literature [1] [2] [3]. Diagnosis may be delayed due to nonspecific symptoms and variable presentation. Upper gastrointestinal barium study is currently the standard investigation for evaluation, although diagnosis at the time of surgical intervention is not uncommon [1] [4] [5]. Children with an antral web may also undergo endoscopic evaluation that fails to diagnose the abnormality [4] because of a low level of suspicion and insufficient clinical training to identify this rare anomaly.

Endoscopic diagnostic criteria for antral web were described in 1969, and include a small aperture of fixed size (1 mm – 1 cm) with surrounding smooth mucosa and normal peristalsis distally. However, experience since that time has revealed that the anatomic defect of an antral web is a continuum. This heterogeneity is evidenced by the nine patients diagnosed with antral web at our institution from 2005 to 2015 reviewed here ([Table 1]; [Fig. 1 a – c]; [Video 1]). Once the web was identified in our patients, surgical (or endoscopic) resection led to resolution of symptoms.

Table 1

Patients diagnosed with an antral web at the Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin from 2005 to 2015. Only one patient was diagnosed by barium study prior to endoscopy.

Patient no.

Age at diagnosis, months

Sex

Symptoms

Duration of symptoms, months

Prior upper GI findings

Prior ultrasound

EGDs, n

Outcome

1

139

Male

Emesis, FTT

131

Normal

None

> 5

Improved emesis; continued oral aversion

2

131

Male

Emesis, weight loss, pain

 24

Large stomach, otherwise normal

None

3

Improved emesis; improved body mass index: improved pain

3

 27

Male

Emesis, FTT and dependent on gastrostomy tube

 26

Normal

None

2

Improved emesis; full PO feeding 3 months after surgery

4

 45

Male

Emesis

 10

Normal

None

2

Improved emesis

5

  6

Male

Emesis

  5

Pylorospasm

Normal

1

Improved emesis

6

  4

Male

Emesis, weight loss

  2

Normal

Normal

1

Improved emesis; improved weight-for-length

7

  1

Male

Emesis

  0.5

Normal

Normal

1

Improved emesis

8

  7

Male

Emesis, weight loss

  6

Normal

Normal

1

Improved emesis; improved weight-for-length

9

 95

Female

Abdominal distension, dependent on gastrojejunostomy tube

  7

Gastric outlet obstruction

None

1

Improved emesis; increased PO feeding

EGD, esophagogastroduodenoscopy; FTT, failure to thrive; PO, by mouth; GI, gastrointestinal.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Examples of antral webs in children. a Circumferential diaphragm with a central aperture through which the true pylorus is seen. b Crescentic fold overhanging a long, narrow channel leading to the pylorus. c Circumferential redundant folds that did not resolve with full gastric insufflation or peristalsis.
Video 1: Endoscopic diagnosis of antral webs in children, showcasing: (i) a false pylorus and antropyloric chamber created by a web; (ii) a partial web obscuring the pylorus; and (iii) a narrow and obstructing prepyloric channel created by a web.

Quality:

As shown in these patients, an antral web may be mistaken for the pylorus, the prepyloric channel created by the web may be traversed without recognition of its obstructive nature, and a partial web may be seen as a gastric fold. Because of the rarity of this anatomic abnormality, a high index of suspicion and thorough evaluation of the antropyloric region are required when endoscopy is carried out for feeding intolerance.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CCL_1AB_2AD_3AD

 
  • References

  • 1 Bell M, Ternberg J, McAlister W. et al. Antral diaphragm – a cause of gastric outlet obstruction in infants and children. J Pediatr 1977; 90: 1-3
  • 2 Feng J, Gu W, Li M. et al. Rare causes of gastric outlet obstruction in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2007; 21: 635-640
  • 3 Campbell DP, Vanhoutte JJ, Smith EI. Partially obstructing antral web – a distinct clinical entity. J Pediatr Surg 1973; 8: 723-728
  • 4 Borgnon J, Ouillon-Villet C, Huet F. et al. Gastric outlet obstruction by an antral mucosal diaphragm: a case of a congenital anomaly revealed by an acquired disease. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2003; 13: 327-329
  • 5 deVries A, Bodewes F, van Baren R. et al. Misleading clinical symptoms and a prolonged diagnostic approach in a prepyloric web. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2011; 52: 627-629