Sagittal Alignment Concepts and Spinopelvic Parameters

Abstract

Spinal surgery continues to expand its horizons to care for disabled patients presenting pain and deformities. Over the past decade, our knowledge of spinal alignment, from the skull to the pelvis, has increased considerably. Such knowledge must expand to reach general orthopedists and improve the care required for so many people.

Global spinal alignment is a critical concept in understanding the impact of pathological conditions (degenerative diseases, traumas, deformities) and their treatment, including spinal instrumentation and arthrodesis. Therefore, the treatment of any spinal disease must include the knowledge of the complexity of the spinopelvic alignment.

At first, all parameters seem like pure mathematics, hardly applicable to the everyday life of the inattentive reader. However, it gradually becomes clear that, like everything else in orthopedics, biomechanics is an essential part of the knowledge of the musculoskeletal system, revealing the logic behind the physiology of movements.

The knowledge of the sagittal alignment concepts and spinopelvic parameteres provide a better comprehension of the axial and appendicular skeletons, increasing the understanding of the physiological and adaptive spinal processes in the face of the degenerative process that increases throughout life.

Keywords

spine/surgery - spinopelvic parameters - spinal fusion - sagittal alignment

Financial Support

There was no financial support from public, commercial, or non-profit sources.

Publication History

Received: 20 December 2020

Accepted: 22 November 2021

Article published online:
11 March 2022

• Referências

• 1 Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, Farcy JP. Considerações sobre o plano sagital e a pelve no paciente adulto. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34 (17) 1828-1833
• 2 Hardacker JW, Shuford RF, Capicotto PN, Pryor PW. Radiographic standing cervical segmental alignment in adult volunteers without neck symptoms. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997; 22 (13) 1472-1480
• 3 Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30 (03) 346-353
• 4 Aoki Y, Nakajima A, Takahashi H. et al. Influence of pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch on surgical outcomes of short-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16: 213
• 5 Bradford DS, Tay BK, Hu SS. Adult scoliosis: surgical indications, operative management, complications, and outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999; 24 (24) 2617-2629
• 6 Savarese LG, Menezes-Reis R, Bonugli GP, Herrero CFPDS, Defino HLA, Nogueira-Barbosa MH. Spinopelvic sagittal balance: what does the radiologist need to know?. Radiol Bras 2020; 53 (03) 175-184
• 7 Le Huec JC, Roussouly P. Sagittal spino-pelvic balance is a crucial analysis for normal and degenerative spine. Eur Spine J 2011; 20 Suppl 5(Suppl 5): 556-557
• 8 Van Royen BJ, Toussaint HM, Kingma I. et al. Accuracy of the sagittal vertical axis in a standing lateral radiograph as a measurement of balance in spinal deformities. Eur Spine J 1998; 7 (05) 408-412
• 9 Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Baldus CR, Blanke KM. Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999; 24 (16) 1712-1720
• 10 Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Lenke LG, Baldus C, Blanke K. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85 (03) 454-463
• 11 Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Cheh G. Pseudarthrosis in long adult spinal deformity instrumentation and fusion to the sacrum: prevalence and risk factor analysis of 144 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31 (20) 2329-2336
• 12 Dorward IG, Lenke LG. Osteotomies in the posterior-only treatment of complex adult spinal deformity: a comparative review. Neurosurg Focus 2010; 28 (03) E4
• 13 Tebet MA. Current concepts on the sagittal balance and classification ofspondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Rev Bras Ortop 2014; 49 (01) 3-12
• 14 Hu SS, Berven SH. Preparing the adult deformity patient for spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31 (19) , Suppl) S126-S131
• 15 Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar JR. Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30 (06) 682-688
• 16 Bridwell KH. Decision making regarding Smith-Petersen vs. pedicle subtraction osteotomy vs. vertebral column resection for spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31 (19) , Suppl) S171-S178
• 17 Pateder DB, Kebaish KM, Cascio BM, Neubaeur P, Matusz DM, Kostuik JP. Posterior only versus combined anterior and posterior approaches to lumbar scoliosis in adults: a radiographic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32 (14) 1551-1554
• 18 Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, Hawkinson N, Farcy JP. Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34 (17) E599-E606
• 19 Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Lewis SJ. Treatment of spinal stenosis and fixed sagittal imbalance. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (384) 35-44
• 20 Haid RW, Shaffrey CI, Youssef JA, Schwab FJ. Global Spine Alignment: Principles, pathologies and Procedures. St. Louis, Missouri: Quality Medical Publishing; 2015