Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · International Journal of Recent Surgical and Medical Sciences 2023; 09(01): 045-052
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744182
Original Article

Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis in Elderly Osteoporotic Proximal Humerus Fractures Using J-Nailing Technique

Pankaj Vijay Tathe
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
,
Nilesh Sakharkar
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
,
Akshay Babarao Ingale 
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Proximal humerus fractures in the osteoporotic elderly population are increasing and difficult to treat. Treatment in proximal fracture fixation in elderly has changed from absolute stability to relative stability that preserves soft tissue and vascularity, thereby improving clinical outcomes.

Aims and Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome of proximal humerus fractures in osteoporotic patients using minimally invasive J-nailing technique.

Methods and Materials A prospective observational study was done on 25 patients with proximal humerus fractures belonging to Neer's classification type 2 and 3 operated between May 2018 and June 2020 in the department of orthopaedics in tertiary health care center and treated by multiple intramedullary blunt Kirschner wires (J-nailing technique). The patients were followed up at 2, 6, 12, and 36 weeks. At the end of follow-up, clinical outcome was assessed using Neer's scoring system.

Results Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with J-nailing technique in the elderly population has shown promising results both in terms of function and radiology. Mean union time was 13.48 weeks with a standard deviation of 1.19 weeks. We did not find any significant difference in union time between patients with fracture type 2-part and 3-part. However, there was a significant difference in Neer's scoring between patients with fracture types two-part and three-part.

Conclusion Proximal humerus fracture fixation using minimally invasive techniques with J-nailing is an effective method of stabilization in elderly osteoporotic population, yielding good mechanical alignment, protecting rotator cuff muscles, preserving blood supply and predictable union rates with good clinical results.

Keywords

J-nailing - proximal humerus fractures - elderly


Publication History

Article published online:
05 July 2022

© 2022. Medical and Surgical Update Society. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Baron JA, Karagas M, Barrett J. et al. Basic epidemiology of fractures of the upper and lower limb among Americans over 65 years of age. Epidemiology 1996; 7 (06) 612-618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Calvo E, Morcillo D, Foruria AM, Redondo-Santamaría E, Osorio-Picorne F, Caeiro JR. GEIOS-SECOT Outpatient Osteoporotic Fracture Study Group. Nondisplaced proximal humeral fractures: high incidence among outpatient-treated osteoporotic fractures and severe impact on upper extremity function and patient subjective health perception. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20 (05) 795-801
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lee SH, Dargent-Molina P, Bréart G. EPIDOS Group. Epidemiologie de l'Osteoporose Study. Risk factors for fractures of the proximal humerus: results from the EPIDOS prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17 (05) 817-825
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72 (04) 365-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Wall B, Walch G. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Hand Clin 2007; 23 (04) 425-430 , v–vi
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Handoll HH, Keding A, Corbacho B, Brealey SD, Hewitt C, Rangan A. Five-year follow-up results of the PROFHER trial comparing operative and non-operative treatment of adults with a displaced fracture of the proximal humerus. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B (03) 383-392
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Takeuchi R, Koshino T, Nakazawa A, Numazaki S, Sato R, Saito T. Minimally invasive fixation for unstable two-part proximal humeral fractures: surgical techniques and clinical results using j-nails. J Orthop Trauma 2002; 16 (06) 403-408
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Maurer E, Bahrs C, Kühle L, Ziegler P, Gonser C, Stollhof LE. Comparability of patient-reported outcome measures and clinical assessment tools for shoulder function in patients with proximal humeral fracture. Z Orthop Unfall 2021; 159 (06) 638-648
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Launonen AP, Lepola V, Flinkkilä T, Laitinen M, Paavola M, Malmivaara A. Treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly: a systemic review of 409 patients. Acta Orthop 2015; 86 (03) 280-285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Rabi S, Evaniew N, Sprague SA, Bhandari M, Slobogean GP. Operative vs non-operative management of displaced proximal humeral fractures in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Orthop 2015; 6 (10) 838-846
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Okike K, Lee OC, Makanji H, Harris MB, Vrahas MS. Factors associated with the decision for operative versus non-operative treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures in the elderly. Injury 2013; 44 (04) 448-455
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Schliemann B, Siemoneit J, Theisen Ch, Kösters C, Weimann A, Raschke MJ. Complex fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly–outcome and complications after locking plate fixation. Musculoskelet Surg 2012; 96 (Suppl. 01) S3-S11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hengg C, Nijs S, Klopfer T. et al. Cement augmentation of the proximal humerus internal locking system in elderly patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019; 139 (07) 927-942
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Zhao L, Qi YM, Yang L. et al. Comparison of the effects of proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) alone and PHILOS combined with fibular allograft in the treatment of Neer three- or four-part proximal humerus fractures in the elderly. Orthop Surg 2019; 11 (06) 1003-1012
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Chen H, Cui X, Rui Y, Ma B, Li H. Indirect reduction and strut support of proximal humerus fractures using a titanium mesh in elderly patients: a novel technique. J Orthop Trauma 2020; 34 (04) e142-e147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lopiz Y, Garríguez-Pérez D, Martínez-Illán M, García-Fernández C, Marco F. Third- generation intramedullary nailing for displaced proximal humeral fractures in the elderly: quality of life, clinical results, and complications. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 142 (02) 227-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Alexa O, Puha B, Veliceasa B, Popia I. Percutaneous pinning for proximal humerus fracture. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 2007; 111 (01) 184-189
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Garrigues GE, Johnston PS, Pepe MD, Tucker BS, Ramsey ML, Austin LS. Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients. Orthopedics 2012; 35 (05) e703-e708
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Chalmers PN, Keener JD. Expanding roles for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2016; 9 (01) 40-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar