Endoscopy 2022; 54(S 01): S36-S37
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744634
Abstracts | ESGE Days 2022
ESGE Days 2022 Oral presentations
15:00–16:00 Thursday, 28 April 2022 Club H. Better, faster, stonger : improving training in endoscopy.

REAL-TIME COMPUTER AIDED DETECTION-ASSISTED COLONOSCOPY ELIMINATES DIFFERENCES IN ADENOMA DETECTION RATE BETWEEN TRAINEE AND EXPERIENCED ENDOSCOPISTS

F. Cocomazzi
1   Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, IRCCS, Division of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
,
M. Gentile
1   Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, IRCCS, Division of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
,
I. Loconte
2   University of Bari, Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Bari, Italy
,
A. Mileti
2   University of Bari, Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Bari, Italy
,
R. Paolillo
2   University of Bari, Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Bari, Italy
,
A. Marra
1   Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, IRCCS, Division of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
,
S. Castellana
3   Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Laboratory of Bioinformatics, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
,
T. Mazza
3   Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Laboratory of Bioinformatics, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
,
A. Di Leo
2   University of Bari, Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Bari, Italy
,
F. Perri
1   Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, IRCCS, Division of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
,
G. Biscaglia
1   Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, IRCCS, Division of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
› Author Affiliations
 

Aims Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a well-accepted quality indicator of screening colonoscopy. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) showed its added value in terms of ADR and adenoma miss rate (AMR). To date, there are no studies evaluating the impact of AI on the performance of trainee endoscopists (TE). Aim of this study was to evaluate whether AI may eliminate any difference in ADR or AMR between TE and experienced endoscopists (EE).

Methods We performed a prospective observational study in 45 subjects referred for screening colonoscopy. A same-day tandem examination was carried out for each patient by a TE with the AI assistance and subsequently by an EE unaware of the lesions detected by the TE. Besides ADR and AMR, we also calculated for each subgroup of endoscopists the adenoma per colonoscopy (APC), the polyp detection rate (PDR), the polyp per colonoscopy (PPC) and the polyp miss rate (PMR). Sub-analyses according to size, morphology and site were performed.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1

Results ADR, APC, PDR, and PPC of AI-supported TE were 38%, 0.93, 62%, 1.93, respectively. The corresponding parameters for EE were 40%, 1.07, 58%, 2.22. No significant difference was found for each analysis between the two groups (ρ>0.05). AMR and PMR for AI-assisted TE were 12.5% and 13%. Sub-analyses did not show any significantly difference (ρ>0.05).

Conclusions In this monocenter prospective study, AI showed its possible impact on the endoscopists’ quality training. In the future, this could result in better efficacy of screening colonoscopy by reducing the incidence of interval or missed cancers.



Publication History

Article published online:
14 April 2022

© 2022. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany