J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12(10): 497-505
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1745640
Original Article

Evaluation of Hearing Handicaps and Presbyacusis Using World Wide Web-Based Calculators

Kevin T. Kavanagh
Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, University of Kentucky, Kentucky
› Institutsangaben

Abstract

This article is a clinical report on the applicability of computer software in determining hearing handicaps and presbyacusis. The software is now World Wide Web based and can be implemented in a clinical setting by using JavaScript calculators housed on the World Wide Web at. Added features consist of calculating the maximum recommended allowable noise exposure using the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health 1997 frequencies in handicap determination and the projection of future audiometric thresholds using the International Standards Organization 1999 compression factor. A review of the literature and the theoretical and clinical applications of these new features are discussed. A guide in the selection of Web-based development software is also presented in the hope of encouraging other researchers to develop Web-based versions of their software applications.

Abbreviations: AAO = American Academy of Otolaryngology; AAOO = American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology; ASHA = American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; CHABA = Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics for the National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council; HTL = hearing threshold level; IARL = initial age-related loss; IHT = initial hearing threshold; ISO = International Standards Organization; NIL = noise-induced loss; NIOSH = National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health; OSHA = Occupational Safety and Health Administration; PARL = projected age-related loss



Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
07. März 2022

© 2001. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • REFERENCES

  • American Academy of Otolaryngology. (1958). AAOO Committee on Conservation of Hearing (Subcommittee on Noise). Guide for the evaluation of hearing impairment. Trans Am Acad Opthalmol Otolaryngol 63:236–238.
  • American Academy of Otolaryngology. (1979). American Academy of Otolaryngology Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium and the American Council of Otolaryngology Committee on the Medical Aspects of Noise. Guide for the evaluation of hearing impairment. Am Med Assoc 241:2055–2059.
  • Bies DA, Hansen CH. (1990). An alternative mathematical description of the relationship between noise exposure and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 88:2743–2754.
  • Burns W, Hinchcliffe R, Littler TS. (1964). An exploratory study of hearing loss and noise exposure in textile worker. Ann Occup Hyg 7:323–333.
  • Chon KM, Roh HJ, Goh EK, Wan SG. (1996). Noise induced hearing loss and the individual susceptibility to the noise. Int Tinnitus J 2:73–82.
  • Clark WW. (1992). Hearing: the effects of noise. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 106:669–676.
  • Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics for the National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council. (1963). Critical evaluaton of methods of testing and measurement of non-organic hearing impairment. In: Zwislocki JJ, ed. Report of Working Group. London: US Office of Naval Research, CHABA, 1963, 36.
  • Cooper J, Lightfoot G. (2000). A modified pure tone audiometry technique for medicolegal assessment. Br J Audiol 34:37–45.
  • Dobie RA. (1998). Comments on “Re-examination of risk estimates from the NIOSH Occupational Noise and Hearing Survey.” J Acoust Soc Am 103:2734–2739.
  • Gallo R, Glorig A. (1964). Permanent threshold shift changes produced by noise exposure and aging. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 25:237–245.
  • Goycoolea MV, Goycoolea HG, Farfan CR, Rodriguez LLG, Martinez GC, Vidal R. (1986). Effect of life in industrialized societies on hearing in natives of Easter Island. Laryngoscope 12:1391–1396.
  • Hone S, Keogh I, Norman G. (2001). Assessment of noise- induced hearing loss. Annual meeting of the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation Inc., Denver, CO, September 9–12,2001.2001 official program. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125; (2):P73.
  • International Standards Organization. (1990). Determination of Occupational Noise Exposure and Estimation of Noise-Induced Hearing Impairment. ISO-1999. Geneva: ISO.
  • Hunter KP, Willot JF. (1987). Aging and the auditory brainstem response in mice with severe or minimal presbyacusis. Hear Res 30:207–218.
  • Kavanagh KT. (1992) Evaluation of patients with suspected occupational hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol 3:215–220.
  • Kryter KD. (1991). Hearing loss from gun and railroad noise—relations with ISO standard 1999. J Acoust Soc Am 90:3180–3195.
  • Kryter KD. (1983). Presbyacusis, sociocusis and nosocu- sis. J Acoust Soc Am 73:1897–1917.
  • Macrae JH. (1971). Noise-induced hearing loss and presbyacusis. Audiology 10:323—333.
  • Macrae JH. (1991). Presbyacusis and noise-induced permanent threshold shift. JAcoust Soc Am 90:2514—2516.
  • Mills JH, Dubno JR, Boettcher FA. (1998). Interaction of noise-induced hearing loss and presbyacusis. Scand Audiol Suppl 48:117–122.
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. (1972). NIOSH Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Ocupational Exposure to Noise. DHSS (NIOSH) publication no. 73–11001. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. (1998). Criteria for a Recommended Standard Occupational Noise Exposure. Revised criteria 1998. DHSS (NIOSH 1988) publication no. 98–126. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
  • Nixon J, Glorig A. (1961). Noise-induced permanent threshold shift at 2,000 and 4,000 Hz. J Acoust Soc Am 33:904–913.
  • Occupational Safety and Health Association. (1983a). Regulation of 29 CFR 1910.95 App A. Noise exposure computation. Federal Register 48 (46).
  • Occupational Safety and Health Association. (1983b). Regulation 29 CFR 1910.95 App F. Calculations and application of age corrections to audiograms. Federal Register 48(46).
  • Passchier-Vermeer W. (1968). Hearing Loss due to Exposure to Steady-State Broadband Noise. IG-TNO report no. 35. Delft, The Netherlands: Research Institute for Public Health Engineering, Sound and Light Division.
  • Phaneuf R, Hetu R, Hanley JA. (1985) A Bayesian approach for prediction judged hearing disability. Am J Ind Med 7:343–352.
  • Prince MM, Stayner LT, Smith RJ, Gilbert SJ. (1997). A re-examination of risk estimates from the NIOSH Occupational Noise and Hearing Survey (ONHS). J Acoust Soc Am 101:950–963.
  • Robinson DW, Sutton GJ. (1979). Age effect in hearing— a comparative analysis of published threshold data. Audiology 18:320—334.
  • Rosen S, Bergman M, Plester D, El-Mofty A, Satti MH. (1962). Presbyacusis study of a relatively noise-free population in the Sudan. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 71:727–743.
  • Rosenhall U, Pedersen K, Svanborg A. (1990). Presbyacusis and noise-induced hearing loss. Ear Hear 11:257–263.
  • Rosenwinkel NE, Stewart UC. (1957). The relationship of hearing loss to steady-state noise exposure. Am Ind Hyg Assoc Q 18:227–230.
  • Rosier G. (1994). Progression of hearing loss caused by occupational noise. Scand Audiol 23(1): 13–37.
  • Sataloff RT, Sataloff J. (1993). Formulae differences in state and Federal hearing loss compensation. In: Sataloff RT, Sataloff J, eds. Occupational Hearing Loss. New York: Marcel Dekker, 563–570.
  • Spoor A. (1967). Presbyacusis values in relation to noise induced hearing loss. Int Audiol 6:48—57.
  • Taylor W, Pearson J, Mari A, Burns W. (1965) Study on noise and hearing in jute weaving. J Acoust Soc Am 38:113–120.
  • Welleschik B, Raber A. (1978). Einfluss von Expositionszeit und Alter auf den larmbedingten Hörverlust. Beobachtungen an 25 544 Industriearbeitern. [Influence of exposure time and age on noise-induced hearing loss. Observations in 25,544 industrial workers.] Laryngol Rhinol 57:1037.