Human Frequency-Following Responses: Representation of Second Formant Transitions in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Abstract

Auditory nerve single-unit studies have demonstrated that phase-locking plays an important role in the neural encoding of the spectrum of speech-like sounds. Recently, it has been reported that the phase-locked activity underlying the scalp-recorded human frequencyfollowing response (FFR) also encodes the first two formants of several steady-state vowels and the time-variant frequency presented in tonal sweeps. The purpose of this study was to determine (1) if FFR can encode the time-varying second formant transitions in synthetic stop consonant stimuli in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners, (2) if hearing-impairment causes degradation of this neural representation, and (3) if the degraded representation is correlated with reduced consonant identification in hearing-impaired listeners. FFRs were obtained from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners in response to several synthetic stop consonants. The results demonstrated that the FFR did encode the second formant transition in normal-hearing listeners. However, FFR encoding was severely degraded in most of the hearing-impaired listeners. Further, comparison of identification and FFR data for individual hearing-impaired listeners appears to suggest that degradation in the neural representation of the second formant transition may be accompanied by reduction in identification performance.

Abbreviations: FFR = frequency-following response

Keywords

Neural phase-locking - second formant transition

• REFERENCES

• American National Standards Institute. (1996). Specification for Audiometers. (ANSI S3.6–1996). New York: ANSI.
• Ananthanarayan AK. (1999). Human frequency-following responses to two-tone approximations of steady state vowels. J Audiol Neurootol 4:95–103.
• Ananthanarayan AK, Durrant JD. (1992). The frequencyfollowing response and the onset response: evaluation of frequency specificity using a forward masking paradigm. Ear Hear 13:228–232.
• Ananthanarayan AK, Parkinson J. (2000). Human frequency-following responses: representation of tonal sweeps. J Audiol Neurootol 5:312–21.
• Dorman MF, Marton K, Hannley MT, Lindholm JM. (1985). Phonetic identification by elderly normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 77:664–70.
• Galbraith GC. (1994). Two-channel brain-stem frequencyfollowing response to pure tone and missing fundamental stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 92:321–330.
• Galbraith GC, Brown WS. (1990). Cross-correlation and latency compensation analysis to click-evoked and frequency-following brain-stem responses in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 77:295–308.
• Gerken GM, Moushegian G, Stillman RD, Rupert A. (1975). Human frequency-following response to monaural and binaural stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Res 38:379–386.
• Glaser EM, Suter CM, Dasheiff R, Goldberg A. (1976). The human frequency-following response: its behavior during continuous tone and tone burst stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 40:25–32.
• Greenberg S, Marsh JT, Brown WS, Smith JC. (1987). Neural temporal coding of low pitch. I. Human frequencyfollowing responses to complex tones. Hear Res 25:91–114.
• Jacobson R, Fant G, Halle M. (1963). Preliminaries to Speech Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Kewley-Port D. (1981). Representations of Spectral Change as Cues to Place of Articulation in Stop Consonants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
• Klatt DH. (1980). Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. J Acoust Soc Am 67:971–995.
• Liberman AM, Delattre PC, Cooper FS, Gerstman LJ. (1954). The role of consonant-vowel transitions in the perception of the stop and nasal consonants. Psychol Monagr 68:1–13.
• Miller MI, Sachs MB. (1983). Representation of stop consonants in the discharge patterns of auditory-nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 74:502–517.
• Miller MI, Sachs MB. (1984). Representation of voice pitch in discharge patterns of auditory-nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 74:502–517.
• Miller RL, Calhoun BM, Young ED. (1999a). Contrast enhancement improves the representation of /e/-like vowels in the hearing-impaired auditory nerve. J Acoust Soc Am 106:2693–2708.
• Miller RL, Calhoun BM, Young ED. (1999b). Discriminability of vowel representations in cat auditory nerve fibers after acoustic trauma. J Acoust Soc Am 105:311–325.
• Miller RL, Schilling JR, Franck KR, Young ED. (1997). Effects of acoustic trauma on the representation of vowel /e/ in cat auditory nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 101:3602–3616.
• Moushegian G, Rupert AL, Stillman RD. (1973). Scalp- recorded early responses in man to frequencies in the scalp range. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 35:665–667.
• Palmer AR, Moorjani PA. (1993). Responses to speech signals in the normal and pathological peripheral auditory system. Progr Brain Res 97:107–115.
• Pandya PK. (19961. Evaluation of the Human Frequency Following Response Distortion Product at 2F1–F2. Unpublished thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
• Schilling JR, Miller RL, Sachs MB, Young ED. (1998). Frequency shaped amplification changes the neural representation of speech with noise-induced hearing loss. Hear Res 117:57–70.
• Sinex DG, Geisler CD. (1981). Auditory-nerve fiber responses to frequency-modulated tones. Hear Res 4:127–148.
• Sinex DG, Geisler CD. (1984). Responses of auditory- nerve fibers to consonant-vowel syllables. J Acoust Soc Am 73:602–615.
• Sohmer H, Pratt H. (1977). Identification and separation of acoustic frequency-following responses (FFRs) in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 42:492–500.
• Voight MF, Sachs MB, Young ED. (1982). Representation of whispered vowels in discharge patterns of auditory- nerve fibers. Hear Res 8:49–58.
• Worden FG, Marsh JT. (1978). Frequency-following (microphonic-like) neural responses evoked by sound. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 25:42–52.
• Young ED, Sachs MB. (1979). Representation of steadystate vowels in the temporal aspects of the discharge patterns of populations of auditory-nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 66:1381–1403.