CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Clinical Interventional Radiology ISVIR 2023; 07(01): 027-033
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1745775
Original Article

Frailty as a Predictor of Complications and Transplant-Free Survival after Transarterial Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Rana Rabei
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Parmede Vakil
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Bradley King
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
,
R. Peter Lokken
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Michael Heller
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Nicholas Fidelman
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Maureen Kohi
2   Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Purpose To determine the association between frailty, 30-day complications, rehospitalization, and transplant-free survival (TFS) following conventional and drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization.

Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on a cohort of 125 patients with treatment-naïve hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent conventional or drug-eluting beads chemoembolization at our institution between 2014 and 2015. Liver function parameters, Barcelona clinic liver cancer tumor stage, and all components of the five-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) were used to determine the patient's frailty status. Key end points included severe (grade 3 or above) adverse events of chemoembolization, 30-day rehospitalization rates, and TFS. Logistic regression analysis was performed on conventional predictors of postoperative complications after chemoembolization. Median survival was estimated and compared using the Kaplan–Meier's estimator and log-rank test.

Results Among 125 patients who underwent first-time chemoembolization, higher frailty score was an independent predictor of both 30-day hospital readmission and severe liver toxicity (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively) on multivariate logistic regression analysis. Each point increase in mFI-5 conferred a threefold or twofold increase in the risk of experiencing 30-day rehospitalization or postoperative severe adverse events, respectively. At the data censor date, patients with mFI-5 score ≥ 2 had decreased overall TFS (28.1 vs. 39.8 months, p = 0.03).

Conclusion Increasing frailty as determined by mFI-5 is an independent predictor of 30-day complications and lower TFS following chemoembolization.

Ethical approval

The article was exempted from an ethical committee approval.


Note

For this type of study, formal consent is not required. This single-center, retrospective cohort study is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant and was approved by the Institutional Review Board at our institution.




Publication History

Article published online:
17 May 2022

© 2022. Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Dohmen K, Shirahama M, Shigematsu H, Irie K, Ishibashi H. Optimal treatment strategy for elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 19 (08) 859-865
  • 2 El-Serag HB. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma in USA. Hepatol Res 2007; 37 (Suppl. 02) S88-S94
  • 3 Padhya KT, Marrero JA, Singal AG. Recent advances in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2013; 29 (03) 285-292
  • 4 Thuluvath PJ, Guidinger MK, Fung JJ, Johnson LB, Rayhill SC, Pelletier SJ. Liver transplantation in the United States, 1999-2008. Am J Transplant 2010; 10 (4 Pt 2): 1003-1019
  • 5 Bruix J, Sherman M. American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 2011; 53 (03) 1020-1022
  • 6 Marrero JA. Multidisciplinary management of hepatocellular carcinoma: where are we today?. Semin Liver Dis 2013; 33 (1, suppl 1): S3-S10
  • 7 Bruix J, Llovet JM. Prognostic prediction and treatment strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2002; 35 (03) 519-524
  • 8 Barman PM, Sharma P, Krishnamurthy V. et al. Predictors of mortality in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization. Dig Dis Sci 2014; 59 (11) 2821-2825
  • 9 Wang Y, Chen Y, Ge N. et al. Prognostic significance of alpha-fetoprotein status in the outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma after treatment of transarterial chemoembolization. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19 (11) 3540-3546
  • 10 Hansmann J, Evers MJ, Bui JT. et al. Albumin-bilirubin and platelet-albumin-bilirubin grades accurately predict overall survival in high-risk patients undergoing conventional transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28 (09) 1224-1231 .e2
  • 11 Lokken RP, Kerlan Jr RK, Chung YC. et al. Hepatic toxicity after selective chemoembolization is associated with decreased survival among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 216 (05) 1283-1290
  • 12 Ray Jr CE, Brown AC, Green TJ. et al. Survival outcomes in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with drug-eluting bead chemoembolization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204 (02) 440-447
  • 13 Partridge JS, Harari D, Dhesi JK. Frailty in the older surgical patient: a review. Age Ageing 2012; 41 (02) 142-147
  • 14 Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C. et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ 2005; 173 (05) 489-495
  • 15 Subramaniam S, Aalberg JJ, Soriano RP, Divino CM. New 5-factor modified frailty index using American College of Surgeons NSQIP Data. J Am Coll Surg 2018; 226 (02) 173-181 .e8
  • 16 Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ. et al. Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210 (06) 901-908
  • 17 Shinall Jr MC, Arya S, Youk A. et al. Association of preoperative patient frailty and operative stress with postoperative mortality. JAMA Surg 2020; 155 (01) e194620
  • 18 Arya S, Kim SI, Duwayri Y. et al. Frailty increases the risk of 30-day mortality, morbidity, and failure to rescue after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair independent of age and comorbidities. J Vasc Surg 2015; 61 (02) 324-331
  • 19 Adams P, Ghanem T, Stachler R, Hall F, Velanovich V, Rubinfeld I. Frailty as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in inpatient head and neck surgery. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 139 (08) 783-789
  • 20 Wahl TS, Graham LA, Hawn MT. et al. Association of the modified frailty index with 30-day surgical readmission. JAMA Surg 2017; 152 (08) 749-757
  • 21 Wang J, Zou Y, Zhao J. et al. The impact of frailty on outcomes of elderly patients after major vascular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2018; 56 (04) 591-602
  • 22 Lin HS, McBride RL, Hubbard RE. Frailty and anesthesia - risks during and post-surgery. Local Reg Anesth 2018; 11: 61-73
  • 23 McIsaac DI, MacDonald DB, Aucoin SD. Frailty for perioperative clinicians: a narrative review. Anesth Analg 2020; 130 (06) 1450-1460
  • 24 Franken LG, de Winter BC, van Esch HJ. et al. Pharmacokinetic considerations and recommendations in palliative care, with focus on morphine, midazolam and haloperidol. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2016; 12 (06) 669-680
  • 25 Fernandez-Bustamante A, Sprung J, Cartin-Ceba R, Weingarten TN, Warner DO. The aging respiratory system: strategies to minimize postoperative pulmonary complications. In: Geriatric Anesthesiology. Springer, Cham; 2018: 179-196
  • 26 Amrock LG, Deiner S. Perioperative frailty. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2014; 52 (04) 26-41
  • 27 Partridge JS, Harari D, Dhesi JK. Frailty in the older surgical patient: a review. Age Ageing 2012; 41 (02) 142-147
  • 28 Lai JC, Feng S, Terrault NA, Lizaola B, Hayssen H, Covinsky K. Frailty predicts waitlist mortality in liver transplant candidates. Am J Transplant 2014; 14 (08) 1870-1879
  • 29 Lai JC, Dodge JL, Kappus MR. et al; Multi-Center Functional Assessment in Liver Transplantation (FrAILT) Study. Changes in frailty are associated with waitlist mortality in patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2020; 73 (03) 575-581
  • 30 Lai JC, Covinsky KE, Dodge JL. et al. Development of a novel frailty index to predict mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology 2017; 66 (02) 564-574
  • 31 Buchard B, Boirie Y, Cassagnes L, Lamblin G, Coilly A, Abergel A. Assessment of malnutrition, sarcopenia and frailty in patients with cirrhosis: which tools should we use in clinical practice?. Nutrients 2020; 12 (01) 186