Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1747663
Therapeutic drug monitoring of sertraline in pediatric population: A naturalistic study with insights into the clinical response of obsessive-compulsive disorder
*Equal contribution
Introduction Sertraline is the first-line medication for treatment of pediatric anxiety, depression and early-onset obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Owing to complex etiologies underlying psychiatric disorders and differing metabolisms, relationship between pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and tolerability of sertraline across indications and in individual cases, particularly in non-adult patients, is not fully understood.
Methods This therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) study was implemented in a transdiagnostic sample of children and adolescents (n=78; mean age, 14.22±2.39; range, 7–18 years) treated with sertraline, as part of the international “TDM-VIGIL” project. Associations between dose, serum concentration, medication-specific therapeutic and side effects measured by an adapted Clinical Global Impression scale were investigated. The 56-item Pediatric Adverse Event Rating Scale served to assess drug tolerability.
Results The analysis showed a linear positive association between dose and serum concentration, with dose explaining 45% of the variance in concentration, as well as significant effects of weight and co-medication. Neither dose nor serum concentration were associated with side effects transdiagnostically, and overall a mild-to-moderate tolerability profile was reported. Notably, when split into depression (MDD) and OCD diagnoses, the probability of clinical improvement significantly increased with both higher doses and higher resulting concentrations, unlike for MDD.
Conclusions This study revealed a significant diagnosis-specific effect between sertraline serum concentration and clinical efficacy for pediatric OCD. Possibly, sertraline-related improvements in OCD are not dependent on the short-term availability of serotonin, but rather on long-term postsynaptic changes. TDM may be a valuable discovery tool in psychiatry and may facilitate a personalized medicine approach.
Conflict of Interest KE, RT, MR, MG and PP received grant research support from BfArM. MR currently receives a research grant from Kids-Safe, Innovation Committee of the German Federal Joint Committee (G-BA grant number 01NVF16021). PP receives grant research support from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and was involved in clinical trials from Servier and Lundbeck; he received an advisor honorarium from Boehringer Ingelheim and speaker’s honoraria from Shire, Infectopharm and Gerot Lannach. CC has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria from: AbbVie, Acadia, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Aristo, Axsome, Damitsa, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, IntraCellular Therapies, Janssen/J&J, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedAvante-ProPhase, MedInCell, Medscape, Merck, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mylan, Neurocrine, Noven, Otsuka, Pfizer, Recordati, Rovi, Servier, SK Life Science, Sumitomo Dainippon, Sunovion, Supernus, Takeda, Teva, and Viatris. He provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Lundbeck, Rovi, Supernus, and Teva. He has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He received royalties from UpToDate and is also a stock option holder of LB Pharma. TB received personal fees from Lundbeck, Medice, Neurim Pharmaceuticals, Oberberg GmbH, Takeda, Infectopharm, and Eli Lilly; serving as an advisor or consultant to Bristol Myers Squibb, Desitin Arzneimittel, Eli Lilly, Medice, Novartis, Pfizer, Shire, UCB, and Vifor Pharma; receiving conference attendance support, conference support, or speaking fees from Eli Lilly, Janssen McNeil, Medice, Novartis, Shire, and UCB; being involved in clinical trials conducted by Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Shire; and receiving royalties from Hogrefe, Kohlhammer, CIP-Medien, and Oxford University Press. SW has received in the last 5 years royalties from Thieme, Hogrefe, Kohlhammer, E. Tini et al. Comprehensive Psychiatry 115 (2022) 152301 9 Springer, Beltz. Her work was supported in the last 5 years by the Swiss National Science Foundation, diff. EU FP7s programs, Hochspezialisierte Medizin of the Kanton Zurich, Switzerland, BfArM, ZInEP, Hartmann Müller Stiftung, Olga Mayenfisch, Gertrud Thalmann, Vontobel, Unicentia, Erika Schwarz Fonds, Gesundheitsforderung Schweiz. The other authors (ET, LS, CW, AK, KR, UM, SU, MS, HR, GA, WB, CF, TH, HI, MKae, MKo, TR, SR, CR, GS, FT, and SF) declare no conflict of interest.
Publication History
Article published online:
16 May 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany