PDF herunterladen
Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13(03): 612-620
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1749597
CIC 2021

An Evidence-Based Roadmap for the Provision of More Equitable Telemedicine

Ryan Jelinek
1   Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
,
Deepti Pandita
1   Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
,
Mark Linzer
1   Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
,
Jeremy Bikah Bi Nguema Engoang
2   Analytics Center of Excellence, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
,
Holly Rodin
2   Analytics Center of Excellence, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
› Institutsangaben Funding M.L. is supported in his work in burnout reduction through the National Institutes of Health.
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, as a safety-net organization with a substantial percentage of patients of color and with limited English proficiency (LEP), we were wary of furthering health disparities in our community. We analyzed gaps in telemedicine (telephone and video) delivery in our communities, quantified the effects of our tests of change, and began the process of accumulating evidence to create a road map for other organizations.

Methods We leveraged Lean problem-solving strategies to identify modifiable gaps across multiple domains that could inhibit equity in telemedicine. We implemented tests of change across domains of community engagement, technology, education, and access. We observed the proportion of telemedicine encounters across races and languages between April and November, 2020. Regression analyses tested the impact of race and language on telemedicine controlling for age, gender, insurance, and time.

Results Several rounds of changes and enhancements were associated with changes in telemedicine use of +5.5% (p < 0.0001) for Hispanic, +4.0% (p < 0.0001) for Spanish-speaking, −2.1% for Black (p < 0.05), and −4.4% for White patients (p < 0.001). African-American, Hispanic, and non-English-speaking patients had between 2.3 and 4.6 times the odds of preferring telephone to video encounters (p < 0.0001), with increases in preferences for video use over time (p < 0.05).

Conclusion Our roadmap to improve equitable delivery of telemedicine was associated with a significant improvement in telemedicine use among certain minority populations. Most populations of color used telephone more often than video. This preference changed over time and with equity-focused changes in telemedicine delivery.

Keywords

telemedicine - equity - Lean methods - minority populations - telemedicine and telehealth - implementation and deployment - outcome and process assessment - people - economic barriers (digital divide)

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. This work was determined to be quality improvement work and not subject to full IRB review at our organization.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 01. Dezember 2021

Angenommen: 20. April 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
08. Juni 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Medicare Telemedicine Health Care Provider Fact Sheet | CMS. Published January 20, 2021. Accessed January 20, 2021 at: https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/medicare-telemedicine-health-care-provider-fact-sheet
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Antonio MG, Petrovskaya O, Lau F. Is research on patient portals attuned to health equity? A scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (8-9): 871-883
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Garrett N, Bikah Bi Nguema Engoang JA, Rubin S, Vickery KD, Winkelman TNA. Health system resource use among populations with complex social and behavioral needs in an urban, safety-net health system. Healthc (Amst) 2020; 8 (03) 100448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Batsis JA, DiMilia PR, Seo LM. et al. Effectiveness of ambulatory telemedicine care in older adults: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019; 67 (08) 1737-1749
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Khairat S, Haithcoat T, Liu S. et al. Advancing health equity and access using telemedicine: a geospatial assessment. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (8–9): 796-805
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Jaffe DH, Lee L, Huynh S, Haskell TP. Health inequalities in the use of telehealth in the United States in the lens of COVID-19. Popul Health Manag 2020; 23 (05) 368-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ye S, Kronish I, Fleck E. et al. Telemedicine expansion during the COVID-19 pandemic and the potential for technology-driven disparities. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36 (01) 256-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 United States Census Bureau, 2010 Census. United States Census Bureau. Accessed January 21, 2021. Accessed May 05, 2022 at: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bommakanti KK, Smith LL, Liu L. et al. Requiring smartphone ownership for mHealth interventions: who could be left out?. BMC Public Health 2020; 20 (01) 81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bailey SC, O'Conor R, Bojarski EA. et al. Literacy disparities in patient access and health-related use of Internet and mobile technologies. Health Expect 2015; 18 (06) 3079-3087
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Covid-10 Impact and Basic Needs Survey. Hennepin Healthcare. 2020 . Accessed January 20, 2021 at: https://hennepinhealthcare.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/COVID_Results_Packet_R10_Final.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hennepin Healthcare Video Visits Landing page and Toolkits. Accessed May 05, 2022 at: Hennepinhealthcare.org/videovisits
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Casillas A, Abhat A, Mahajan A. et al. Portals of change: How patient portals will ultimately work for safety net populations. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (10) e16835
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Rutledge C, Hawkins EJ, Bordelon M, Gustin TS. Telehealth education: An interprofessional online immersion experience in response to COVID-19. J Nurs Educ 2020; 59 (10) 570-576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Patel SY, Mehrotra A, Huskamp HA, Uscher-Pines L, Ganguli I, Barnett ML. Variation in telemedicine use and outpatient care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Health Aff (Millwood) 2021; 40 (02) 349-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Eberly LA, Kallan MJ, Julien HM. et al. Patient characteristics associated with telemedicine access for primary and specialty ambulatory care during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 (12) e2031640
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Chunara R, Zhao Y, Chen J. et al. Telemedicine and healthcare disparities: a cohort study in a large healthcare system in New York City during COVID-19. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (01) 33-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gilson SF, Umscheid CA, Laiteerapong N, Ossey G, Nunes KJ, Shah SD. Growth of ambulatory virtual visits and differential use by patient sociodemographics at one urban academic medical center during the COVID-19 pandemic: Retrospective analysis. JMIR Med Inform 2020; 8 (12) e24544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Rodriguez JA, Betancourt JR, Sequist TD, Ganguli I. Differences in the use of telephone and video telemedicine visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Manag Care 2021; 27 (01) 21-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Franks P, Fiscella K, Meldrum S. Racial disparities in the content of primary care office visits. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20 (07) 599-603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Sinsky C, Linzer M. Practice and policy reset post-COVID-19: reversion, transition, or transformation?. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020; 39 (08) 1405-1411
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar