RSS-Feed abonnieren
PDF herunterladen
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1754382
Does Prophylactic Use of Postcesarean Section Laxatives Favor Bowel Movements?
Abstract
Introduction Chronic constipation (CC) is a highly prevalent disease in Western society. Chronic constipation can have a different etiology in patients who underwent a cesarean section and result from postoperative stress and metabolic response to trauma, analgesic agents, immobilization, and dietary restrictions. Chronic constipation may also occur due to puerperium-related psychological changes and to the stretching and weakening of the perineal and abdominal muscles after childbirth.
Objectives The present study analyzes intestinal transit restoration after a cesarean section and the influence of osmotic laxative agents.
Methods The present prospective, nonrandomized sample study used the ROME III questionnaire and the Bristol stool scale in adult women who underwent a cesarean section. We divided the subjects into 2 groups, each with 30 patients, to compare the effect of the prophylactic administration of an osmotic laxative.
Results We evaluated 60 randomly-chosen pregnant women from the Obstetrics ward of Hospital Santa Marcelina, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, from October 2019 to March 2020. Their mean age was 26.8 years old, and the mean gestation time was 37.95 weeks. Ten patients (16.7%) presented with constipation before the cesarean section, and 38 (63.3%) had a bowel movement after the procedure. However, in 84.2% of these patients, the usual stool consistency worsened. After the cesarean section, 46.7% of the women who did not receive laxative agents had a bowel movement, compared with 80% of those who did (p = 0.0074).
Conclusion Some factors, including those related to the procedure, may hamper intestinal transit restoration after a cesarean section. Osmotic laxative agents can facilitate transit restoration with no negative effects in this group of patients.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 18. Februar 2022
Angenommen: 07. Juni 2022
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. Juli 2022
© 2022. Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 Corrêa Neto IJF, Maneira ALC, Teixeira NB. et al. There is an agreement between constipation referred and that documented by objective criteria?. J Coloproctol (Rio J) 2016; 36 (03) 153-156
- 2 Klug WA, Aguida HAC, Ortiz JA, Fang CB, Capelhuchnik P. Alterações das pressões anais na gravidez. Rev Bras Coloproctol 2007; 27 (02) 196-201
- 3 Lacy BE, Brunton SA. Partnering with gastroenterologists to evaluate patients with chronic constipation. MedGenMed 2005; 7 (02) 19-34
- 4 Sobrado CW, Corrêa Neto IJF, Pinto RA, Sobrado LF, Nahas SC, Cecconello I. Diagnosis and treatment of constipation: a clinical update based on the Rome IV criteria. J Coloproctol (Rio J) 2018; 38 (02) 137-144
- 5 McNicol E, Horowicz-Mehler N, Fisk RA. et al; Americal Pain Society. Management of opioid side effects in cancer-related and chronic noncancer pain: a systematic review. J Pain 2003; 4 (05) 231-256
- 6 Gómez López ME, Morales Carmona F, Aldana Calva E, Gaviño Gaviño F. Estado emocional de la mujer en relación con el parto o cesárea. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2008; 76 (07) 365-372
- 7 Derbyshire E, Davies J, Costarelli V, Dettmar P. Diet, physical inactivity and the prevalence of constipation throughout and after pregnancy. Matern Child Nutr 2006; 2 (03) 127-134
- 8 Ross GR, Gabra BH, Dewey WL, Akbarali HI. Morphine tolerance in the mouse ileum and colon. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2008; 327 (02) 561-572
- 9 Chiarelli P, Brown W, McElduff P. Constipation in Australian women: prevalence and associated factors. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2000; 11 (02) 71-78
- 10 Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997; 32 (09) 920-924
- 11 Anderson AS, Whichelow MJ. Constipation during pregnancy: dietary fibre intake and the effect of fibre supplementation. Hum Nutr Appl Nutr 1985; 39 (03) 202-207
- 12 Greenhalf JO, Leonard HSD. Laxatives in the treatment of constipation in pregnant and breast-feeding mothers. Practitioner 1973; 210 (256) 259-263
- 13 Trottier M, Erebara A, Bozzo P. Treating constipation during pregnancy. Can Fam Physician 2012; 58 (08) 836-838
- 14 Vazquez JC. Constipation, haemorrhoids, and heartburn in pregnancy. BMJ Clin Evid 2010; 2010: 1411-1418
- 15 Shin GH, Toto EL, Schey R. Pregnancy and postpartum bowel changes: constipation and fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110 (04) 521-529 , quiz 530
- 16 Ferdinande K, Dorreman Y, Roelens K, Ceelen W, De Looze D. Anorectal symptoms during pregnancy and postpartum: a prospective cohort study. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20 (12) 1109-1116
- 17 Jewell DJ, Young G. Interventions for treating constipation in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; x (02) CD001142
- 18 Santana LS, Gallo RBS, Marcolin AC. Utilização dos recursos fisioterapêuticos no puerpério: revisão da literatura. Femina 2011; 39 (05) 245-250