Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2022; 14(02): e246-e256
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756122
Research Article

Relative Importance of Applicant Characteristics in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Selection: A Survey of Program Directors

Samuel A. Cohen
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
,
Suzann Pershing
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
› Author Affiliations Funding No funding was provided for this study.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Ophthalmology residency positions remain competitive. A lack of clarity regarding which residency selection criteria are prioritized by program directors can heighten the stress associated with the match process. While surveys of program directors in several other medical specialties have been conducted to identify the most important residency selection criteria, there is limited data on selection criteria used by ophthalmology residency program directors. The purpose of our study was to survey ophthalmology residency program directors to identify the current state of interview selection decisions—the factors currently considered most important in determining whether to extend an interview invitation to residency applicants.

Methods We developed and distributed a Web-based questionnaire to all U.S. ophthalmology residency program directors. Questions evaluated program demographics and the relative importance of 23 different selection criteria used by ophthalmology residency program directors when evaluating applicants for residency interviews (Likert scale 1–5, with 1 being “not important” and 5 being “very important”). Program directors were also asked to identify the one factor they felt was most important.

Results The overall residency program director response rate was 56.5% (70/124). The selection criteria with the highest average importance scores were core clinical clerkship grades (4.26/5) followed by letters of recommendation (4.06/5), and United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score (4.03/5). The most frequently cited single most important factor for interview selection was core clinical clerkship grades (18/70, 25.7%), with USMLE Step 1 score (9/70, 12.9%) and rotations at the program director's department (6/70, 8.6%) also commonly reported.

Conclusion Our results suggest that core clinical clerkship grades, letters of recommendation, and USMLE Step 1 scores are deemed the most important selection criteria by ophthalmology residency program directors as of a 2021 survey. With changes in clerkship grading for many medical schools and changes in national USMLE Step 1 score reporting, programs will face challenges in evaluating applicants and the relative importance of other selection criteria will likely increase.

Keywords

ophthalmology - residency - interview - program director - selection criteria


Publication History

Received: 21 January 2022

Accepted: 20 July 2022

Article published online:
12 October 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Ophthalmology Residency Match Summary Report.. Accessed July 1, 2021, at: https://aupo.org/news/2021-04/2021-ophthalmology-residency-match-summary-report
  • 2 Moore DB. Not a cheap investment: estimating the cost of the 2017 to 2018 ophthalmology residency match to the applicant and program. J Acad Ophthalmol 2018; 10 (01) e158-e162
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Weissbart SJ, Stock JA, Wein AJ. Program directors' criteria for selection into urology residency. Urology 2015; 85 (04) 731-736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Al Khalili K, Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris S. et al. Programs selection criteria for neurological surgery applicants in the United States: a national survey for neurological surgery program directors. World Neurosurg 2014; 81 (3-4): 473-477.e2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Grubbs Jr JR, Mian SI. Advising students interested in ophthalmology: a summary of the evidence. Ophthalmology 2016; 123 (07) 1406-1410
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hamdan SA, Makhoul AT, Drolet BC, Lindsey JL, Law JC. Ophthalmology program director perspectives of scoring Step 1 pass/fail. J Acad Ophthalmol 2020; 12 (02) e251-e254
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bullock JL, Seligman L, Lai CJ, O'Sullivan PS, Hauer KE. Moving toward mastery: changes in student perceptions of clerkship assessment with pass/fail grading and enhanced feedback. Teach Learn Med 2022; 34 (02) 198-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Seligman L, Abdullahi A, Teherani A, Hauer KE. From grading to assessment for learning: a qualitative study of student perceptions surrounding elimination of core clerkship grades and enhanced formative feedback. Teach Learn Med 2021; 33 (03) 314-325
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Grabowski G, Walker JW. Orthopaedic fellowship selection criteria: a survey of fellowship directors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (20) e154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Member Institutions | Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology.. Accessed January 13, 2022, at: https://aupo.org/member-institutions
  • 11 FREIDA Residency Program Database | Medical Fellowship Database.. Accessed July 23, 2021, at: https://freida.ama-assn.org/search/list?spec=42956&page=1
  • 12 Cotter EJ, Rasmussen LH, Johnson KP, Hennessy DW, Cannada LK, Whiting PS. Factors considered in ranking hip and knee arthroplasty fellowship applicants: a survey of program directors. Arthroplast Today 2020; 6 (03) 623-627 .e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bernatz JT, Johnson KP, Stokman JJ, Cannada LK, Williams SK, Whiting PS. Factors considered in ranking spine surgery fellowship applicants: a survey of program directors. Spine 2021; 46 (13) 882-885
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Sandhu KP, Simske NM, Young P, Wilson NM, Cannada LK, Whiting PS. Factors considered in ranking orthopaedic trauma fellowship applicants: a survey of program directors. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2020; 4 (11) 00180
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Baweja R, Kraeutler MJ, Mulcahey MK, McCarty EC. Determining the most important factors involved in ranking orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship applicants. Orthop J Sports Med 2017; 5 (11) 2325967117736726
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 At-A-Glance PD Survey. The Match, National Resident Matching Program.. Accessed November 26, 2021, at: https://www.nrmp.org/at-a-glance-program-director-survey/
  • 17 Teherani A, Hauer KE, Lucey C. Can change to clerkship assessment practices create a more equitable clerkship grading process?. Acad Med 2019; 94 (09) 1262-1263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 McDonald JA, Lai CJ, Lin MYC, O'Sullivan PS, Hauer KE. “There Is a Lot of Change Afoot”: a qualitative study of faculty adaptation to elimination of tiered grades with increased emphasis on feedback in core clerkships. Acad Med 2021; 96 (02) 263-270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Bullock JL, Lai CJ, Lockspeiser T. et al. In pursuit of honors: a multi-institutional study of students' perceptions of clerkship evaluation and grading. Acad Med 2019; 94 (11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions) S48-S56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Step USMLE. 1 Transition to Pass/Fail Only Score Reporting. Accessed November 26, 2021, at: https://www.usmle.org/usmle-step-1-transition-passfail-only-score-reporting
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Drake E, Phillips JP, Kovar-Gough I. Exploring preparation for the USMLE Step 2 exams to inform best practices. PRiMER Peer-Rev Rep Med Educ Res 2021; 5: 26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Desai A, Hegde A, Das D. Change in reporting of USMLE Step 1 scores and potential implications for international medical graduates. JAMA 2020; 323 (20) 2015-2016
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Chaudhry HJ, Katsufrakis PJ, Tallia AF. The USMLE Step 1 decision: an opportunity for medical education and training. JAMA 2020; 323 (20) 2017-2018
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Crane MA, Chang HA, Azamfirei R. Medical education takes a step in the right direction: where does that leave students?. JAMA 2020; 323 (20) 2013-2014
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Saudek K, Saudek D, Treat R, Bartz P, Weigert R, Weisgerber M. Dear program director: deciphering letters of recommendation. J Grad Med Educ 2018; 10 (03) 261-266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Garmel GM, Grover CA, Quinn A. et al. Letters of recommendation. J Emerg Med 2019; 57 (03) 405-410
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Jn Pierre CE, Weber GM, Abramowicz AE. Attitudes towards and impact of letters of recommendation for anesthesiology residency applicants. Med Educ Online 2021; 26 (01) 1924599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Han AY, French JC, Tu C, Obiri-Yeboah D, Lipman JM, Prabhu AS. Don't Judge a Letter by its Title: linguistic analysis of letters of recommendation by author's academic rank. J Surg Educ 2021; 78 (06) e19-e27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Tso HL, Young J, Boente CS, Yung CW. The impact of away rotations on the ophthalmology residency match. J Acad Ophthalmol 2021; 13 (01) e19-e25
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Common Program Requirements. Accessed November 27, 2021, at: https://acgme.org/what-we-do/accreditation/common-program-requirements/
  • 31 Prober CG, Kolars JC, First LR, Melnick DE. A plea to reassess the role of United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores in residency selection. Acad Med 2016; 91 (01) 12-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Radabaugh CL, Hawkins RE, Welcher CM. et al. Beyond the United States Medical Licensing Examination score: assessing competence for entering residency. Acad Med 2019; 94 (07) 983-989
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Gardner AK, Cavanaugh KJ, Willis RE, Dunkin BJ. Can better selection tools help us achieve our diversity goals in postgraduate medical education? Comparing use of USMLE Step 1 scores and situational judgment tests at 7 surgical residencies. Acad Med 2020; 95 (05) 751-757
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Bernstein JD, Shahrestani S, Shahrvini B, Watson D. Geographic trends in the otolaryngology match (2016-2020). OTO Open 2021; 5 (02) X211022611
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Glener AD, Lebhar M, Hernandez JA. et al. Location, Location, Location: the geographic impact of medical school on the plastic surgery match. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (04) e3549
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Cox RM, Sobel AD, Biercevicz A, Eberson CP, Mulcahey MK. Geographic trends in the orthopedic surgery residency match. J Grad Med Educ 2018; 10 (04) 423-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Cohen SA, Pershing S. Geographic trends in the ophthalmology residency match: influence of program and applicant characteristics. J Acad Ophthalmol 2022; 14 (01) e81-e92
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar