CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2023; 50(01): 030-036
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1759792
Pediatric/Craniomaxillofacial/Head & Neck
Original Article

A Survey on Procedural Sedation and Analgesia for Pediatric Facial Laceration Repair in Korea

1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Korea
,
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Korea
,
2   Cheongdam Okay Plastic Surgery Clinic, Seoul, Korea
,
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Korea
,
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Korea
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Most children with facial lacerations require sedation for primary sutures. However, sedation guidelines for invasive treatment are lacking. This study evaluated the current status of the sedation methods used for pediatric facial laceration repair in Korea.

Methods We surveyed one resident in each included plastic surgery training hospital using face-to-face interviews or e-mail correspondence. The health care center types (secondary or tertiary hospitals), sedation drug types, usage, and dosage, procedure sequence, monitoring methods, drug effects, adverse events, and operator and guardian satisfaction were investigated.

Results We included 45/67 hospitals (67%) that used a single drug, ketamine in 31 hospitals and chloral hydrate in 14 hospitals. All health care center used similar sedatives. The most used drug administered was 5 mg/kg intramuscular ketamine (10 hospitals; 32%). The most common chloral hydrate administration approach was oral 50 mg/kg (seven hospitals; 50%). Twenty-two hospitals (71%) using ketamine followed this sequence: administration of sedatives, local anesthesia, primary repair, and imaging work-up. The most common sequence used for chloral hydrate (eight hospitals; 57%) was local anesthesia, administration of sedatives, imaging work-up, and primary repair. All hospitals that used ketamine and seven (50%) of those using chloral hydrate monitored oxygen saturation. Median operator satisfaction differed significantly between ketamine and chloral hydrate (4.0 [interquartile range, 4.0–4.0] vs. 3.0 [interquartile range, 3.0–4.0]; p <0.001).

Conclusion The hospitals used various procedural sedation methods for children with facial lacerations. Guidelines that consider the patient's condition and drug characteristics are needed for safe and effective sedation.

Authors' Contributions

H.Y., Ha.P., and D.L. contributed toward conceptualization. D.L. and Y.L. did the data curation. H.Y., D.L., Y.L., Hy.P., and Ha. P. did the formal analysis and methodology. H.Y., Ha.P., D.L., and Y.L. did the project administration and wrote the original draft. H.Y. did the supervision. H.Y., F.L., Hy.P., and Ha.P. did the writing -review and editing. All the authors approved the final manuscript.


Ethical Approval

The study protocol followed the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. The need to seek ethics approval was waived by the Daegu Fatima Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB exemption no. DFE19ORIO047).




Publication History

Received: 15 June 2022

Accepted: 19 October 2022

Article published online:
06 February 2023

© 2023. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Healthcare Bigdata Hub. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. Wonju-si, Gangwon-do, Korea: Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service; 2015 Accessed June 03, 2022, at: http://opendata.hira.or.kr/op/opc/olapHifrqSickInfo.do
  • 2 Korean guideline of pediatric procedural sedation. Seoul, Korea: Korean Society of Pediatric Anesthesiologists. Accessed June 03, 2022 at: https://pedianesth.or.kr/main.html
  • 3 Jang HY, Jung JH, Young Y. et al. Korean guidelines for pediatric procedural sedation and analgesia. J Korean Soc Emerg Med 2012; 23: 303-314
  • 4 Macias CG, Chumpitazi CE. Sedation and anesthesia for CT: emerging issues for providing high-quality care. Pediatr Radiol 2011; 41 (suppl 2): 517-522
  • 5 Choudhary D, Dhillon R, Chadha K, Cross K, Carnevale FP. National survey to describe the current patterns of procedural sedation practices among pediatric emergency medicine practitioners in the United States. Pediatr Emerg Care 2022; 38 (01) e321-e328
  • 6 Sahyoun C, Cantais A, Gervaix A, Bressan S, Löllgen R, Krauss B. Pediatric Emergency Medicine Comfort and Analgesia Research in Europe (PemCARE) group of the Research in European Pediatric Emergency Medicine. Pediatric procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department: surveying the current European practice. Eur J Pediatr 2021; 180 (06) 1799-1813
  • 7 Chen Z, Lin M, Huang Z. et al. Efficacy of chloral hydrate oral solution for sedation in pediatrics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Des Devel Ther 2019; 13: 2643-2653
  • 8 Joo EY, Kim YJ, Park YS. et al. Intramuscular dexmedetomidine and oral chloral hydrate for pediatric sedation for electroencephalography: a propensity score-matched analysis. Paediatr Anaesth 2020; 30 (05) 584-591
  • 9 Sahyoun C, Krauss B. Clinical implications of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of procedural sedation agents in children. Curr Opin Pediatr 2012; 24 (02) 225-232
  • 10 Green SM, Roback MG, Kennedy RM, Krauss B. Clinical practice guideline for emergency department ketamine dissociative sedation: 2011 update. Ann Emerg Med 2011; 57 (05) 449-461
  • 11 Melendez E, Bachur R. Serious adverse events during procedural sedation with ketamine. Pediatr Emerg Care 2009; 25 (05) 325-328
  • 12 Koo SH, Lee DG, Shin H. Optimal initial dose of chloral hydrate in management of pediatric facial laceration. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41 (01) 40-44
  • 13 Momeni M, Esfandbod M, Saeedi M, Farnia M, Basirani R, Zebardast J. Comparison of the effect of intravenous ketamine and intramuscular ketamine for orthopedic procedures in children's sedation. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2014; 4 (03) 191-194
  • 14 Bellolio MF, Puls HA, Anderson JL. et al. Incidence of adverse events in paediatric procedural sedation in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2016; 6 (06) e011384
  • 15 Mace SE, Brown LA, Francis L. et al; EMSC Panel (Writing Committee) on Critical Issues in the Sedation of Pediatric Patients in the Emergency. Clinical policy: critical issues in the sedation of pediatric patients in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2008; 51 (04) 378-399 , 399.e1–399.e57
  • 16 Cozzi G, Norbedo S, Barbi E. Intranasal dexmedetomidine for procedural sedation in children, a suitable alternative to chloral hydrate. Paediatr Drugs 2017; 19 (02) 107-111
  • 17 Poonai N, Spohn J, Vandermeer B. et al. Intranasal dexmedetomidine for procedural distress in children: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2020; 145 (01) e20191623
  • 18 Coté CJ, Wilson S. AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients before, during, and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatrics 2019; 143 (06) 259-260