The Validation of a Paddle Power Meter for Slalom Kayaking

Abstract

The ability to quantify power within the sport of slalom kayaking would provide coaches and athletes objective data to monitor performance. This study determined the validity of a kayak paddle power meter and subsequent relationship between work rate and stroke kinetics. One participant completed multiple trials of a flat-water, straight-line sprint and a sequence of slalom gates at numerous intensities to attain the velocity:power relationship. Laboratory results identified the kayak paddles’ strain gauges were valid and reliable, and field tests presented a cubic relationship for power as a function of velocity in the straight-line sprint (R²=0.982) and the slalom-specific test (R²=0.993). Further analysis of stroke kinetics identified velocity of hand movement at individual peak force capability to be critical in the highest work rates achieved for both slalom and flat-water sprinting. It was concluded that the kayak paddle power meter tested is a valid means of recording work rate and stroke kinetics during kayaking in the field.

• References

• 1 Cabrera D, Ruina A, Kleshnev V. A simple 1+ dimensional model of rowing mimics observed forces and motions. Hum Mov Sci 2006; 25: 192-220
• 2 Ebert TR, Martin DT, McDonald W, Victor J, Plummer J, Withers RT. Power output during women’s World Cup road cycle racing. Eur J Appl Physiol 2005; 95: 529-536
• 3 Gardner AS, Stephens S, Martin DT, Lawton E, Lee H, Jenkins D. Accuracy of SRM and power tap power monitoring systems for bicycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 1252-1258
• 4 Harriss D, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2014 update•. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 1025-1028
• 5 Hunter A, Cochrane J, Sachlikidis A. Canoe slalom competition analysis. Sports Biomech 2008; 7: 24-37
• 6 Kjendlie P-L, Thorsvald K. A tethered swimming power test is highly reliable. Port J Sport Sci 2006; 6: 231-233
• 7 Macdermid PW, Stannard S. Mechanical work and physiological responses to simulated cross country mountain bike racing. J Sports Sci 2012; 30: 1491-1501
• 8 Martin JC, Gardner AS, Barras M, Martin DT. Modeling sprint cycling using field-derived parameters and forward integration. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006; 38: 592
• 9 Martin JC, Milliken DL, Cobb JE, McFadden KL, Coggan AR. Validation of a mathematical model for road cycling power. Journal Appl Biomech 1998; 14: 276-291
• 10 Messias L, Ferrari H, Sousa F, dos Reis I, Serra C, Gobatto C, Manchado-Gobatto F. All-out test in tethered canoe system can determine anaerobic parameters of elite kayakers. Int J Sports Med 2015; 94: 803-808
• 11 Messias LHD, dos Reis IGM, Ferrari HG, de Barros Manchado-Gobatto F. Physiological, psychological and biomechanical parameters applied in canoe slalom training: a review. Int J Perform Anal Sport 2014; 14: 24-41
• 12 Pendergast D, Mollendorf J, Zamparo P, Termin II A. The influence of drag on human locomotion in water. Undersea Hyperb Med 2005; 32: 45
• 13 Pendergast D, Zamparo P, di Prampero PE, Capelli C, Cerretelli P, Termin A, Craig A, Bushnell D, Paschke D, Mollendorf J. Energy balance of human locomotion in water. Eur J Appl Physiol 2003; 90: 377-386
• 14 Sturm D, Yousaf K, Brodin L-Å, Halvorsen K. Wireless kayak on-water ergometry–Part 1: Paddle blade force. Sports Technology 2013; 6: 29-42
• 15 Wilson DG. Bicycling Science. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2004
• 16 Zamparo P, Capelli C, Guerrini G. Energetics of kayaking at submaximal and maximal speeds. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1999; 80: 542-548
• 17 Zamparo P, Tomadini S, Didone F, Grazzina F, Rejc E, Capelli C. Bioenergetics of a slalom kayak (K1) competition. Int J Sports Med 2006; 27: 546-552
• 18 Zatsiorsky VM, Yakunin N. Mechanics and biomechanics of rowing: a review. Int J Sport Biomech 1991; 7: 229-281