Validity and Reliability of the Garmin Vector Power Meter in Laboratory and Field Cycling

Abstract

To assess the validity and reliability of the Garmin Vector against the SRM power meter, 6 cyclists completed 3 continuous trials at power outputs from 100–300 W at 50–90 rev·min⁻¹ and a 5-min time trial in laboratory and field conditions. In field conditions only, a 30-s sprint was performed. Data were compared with paired samples t-tests, with the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) and the typical error. Reliability was calculated as the coefficient of variation (CV). There was no significant difference between the devices in power output in laboratory (p=0.245) and field conditions (p=0.312). 1-s peak power was significantly different between the devices (p=0.043). The LoA were ~1.0±5.0 W and ~0.5±0.5 rev·min⁻¹ in both conditions. The LoA during the 30-s sprint was 6.3±38.9 W and for 1-s peak power it was 18.8±17.1 W. The typical error for power output was 2.9%, while during sprint cycling it was 7.4% for 30-s and 2.7% for 1-s peak power. For cadence, the typical error was below 1.0%. The mean CVs were ~1.0% and ~3.0% for the SRM and Garmin, respectively. These findings suggest, that the Garmin Vector is a valid alternative for training. However, during sprint cycling there is lower agreement with the SRM power meter. Both devices provide good reliability (CV<3.0%).

Key words

SRM - cycling - testing - training - limits of agreement - typical error

• References

• 1 Bertucci W, Crequy S, Chiementin X. Validity and reliability of the G-Cog BMX Powermeter. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 538-543
• 2 Bertucci W, Duc S, Villerius V, Pernin JN, Grappe F. Validity and reliability of the PowerTap mobile cycling powermeter when compared with the SRM Device. Int J Sports Med 2005; 26: 868-873
• 3 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310
• 4 Bouillod A, Pinot J, Soto-Romero G, Grappe F. Validity, sensitivity and reproducibility of Stages and Garmin Vector power meters when compared with SRM device. 33rd International Conference on Biomechanics in Sports; June 29–July 3 2015; Poitiers, France.
• 5 Cohen J. The concepts of power analysis. In, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. 2^nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988: 8-11
• 6 Duc S, Villerius V, Bertucci W, Grappe F. Validity and reproducibility of the ErgomoPro power meter compared with the SRM and Powertap power meters. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2007; 2: 270-281
• 7 Gardner AS, Stephens S, Martin DT, Lawton E, Lee H, Jenkins D. Accuracy of SRM and power tap power monitoring systems for bicycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 1252-1258
• 8 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2016 Update. Int J Sports Med 2015; 36: 1121-1124
• 9 Hopker J, Myers S, Jobson SA, Bruce W, Passfield L. Validity and reliability of the Wattbike cycle ergometer. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 731-736
• 10 Hopkins WG. Spreadsheets for analysis of validity and reliability. Sportscience 2015; 19: 36-44
• 11 Hopkins WG, Schabort EJ, Hawley JA. Reliability of power in physical performance tests. Sports Med 2001; 31: 211-234
• 12 Hurst HT, Atkins S. Agreement between polar and SRM mobile ergometer systems during laboratory-based high-intensity, intermittent cycling activity. J Sports Sci 2006; 24: 863-868
• 13 Kirkland A, Coleman D, Wiles JD, Hopker J. Validity and reliability of the Ergomopro powermeter. Int J Sports Med 2008; 29: 913-916
• 14 Kitawaki T, Oka H. A measurement system for the bicycle crank angle using a wireless motion sensor attached to the crank arm. J Sci Cycling 2013; 2: 13-19
• 15 Millet GP, Tronche C, Fuster N, Bentley DJ, Candau R. Validity and reliability of the Polar S710 mobile cycling powermeter. Int J Sports Med 2003; 24: 156-161
• 16 Nimmerichter A, Eston RG, Bachl N, Williams CA. Longitudinal monitoring of power output and heart rate profiles in elite cyclists. J Sports Sci 2011; 29: 831-840
• 17 Nimmerichter A, Williams CA, Bachl N, Eston RG. Evaluation of a field test to assess performance in elite cyclists. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 160-166
• 18 Novak AR, Dascombe BJ. Agreement of power measures between Garmin Vector and SRM cycle power meters. MPEES 2016; 20: 167-172
• 19 Vogt S, Heinrich L, Schumacher YO, Blum A, Roecker K, Dickhuth HH, Schmid A. Power output during stage racing in professional road cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006; 38: 147-151
• 20 Wooles A, Robinson A, Keen P. A static method for obtaining a calibration factor for SRM bicycle power cranks. Sports Engin 2005; 8: 137-144