Abstract
Rugby has a higher injury burden than other popular sports, such as football. Athletes
who are forced to retire as a result of injury are associated with poor mental health.
With its high injury burden, professional rugby players might be at risk of mental
health conditions associated with injury-related forced retirement. This study aimed
to compare mental health between former professional rugby players who were and weren’t
forced to retire. A questionnaire including the 4DSQ (distress), GHQ-12 (anxiety/depression),
PROMIS short-form (sleep disturbance) and AUDIT-C (alcohol misuse) was completed by
retired professional players from Ireland, France and South Africa. The questionnaire
asked players whether or not they were forced to retire, as well as the reason for
retirement. Players forced to retire were more than twice as likely to report symptoms
of distress in comparison to those that retired voluntarily (odds ratio: 2.1, 95%
confidence interval: 1.2–3.6, p<0.001). None of the other mental health measures (anxiety/depression,
sleep disturbance or alcohol misuse) were associated with forced retirement. In conclusion,
rugby players that were forced to retire may require support structures and longitudinal
monitoring. Future studies should begin monitoring players during their careers to
accurately assess the effect of retirement on mental health.
Key word
football - elite athlete - anxiety - career transition - depression - alcohol misuse