B&G Bewegungstherapie und Gesundheitssport 2017; 33(03): 96-100
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-107473
Wissenschaft
Haug Verlag in Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

Identifikation typischer Bewegungskontexte von Kindern als Ansatzpunkt für die Bewegungsförderung

Vorstellung eines BMG-geförderten Projekts
N. Wirsik
1   Leibniz-Institut für Präventionsforschung und Epidemiologie – BIPS
,
O. Sprengeler
1   Leibniz-Institut für Präventionsforschung und Epidemiologie – BIPS
,
M. Brandes
1   Leibniz-Institut für Präventionsforschung und Epidemiologie – BIPS
,
H. Pohlabeln
1   Leibniz-Institut für Präventionsforschung und Epidemiologie – BIPS
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Eingegangen: 08 March 2017

Angenommen durch Review: 10 March 2017

Publication Date:
12 June 2017 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Zur Prävention kindlichen Übergewichts ist es wichtig, typische Bewegungskontexte von Kindern zu identifizieren, um so optimale Ansatzpunkte zur Bewegungsförderung zu ermitteln. Das im Folgenden vorgestellte Projekt kombiniert dazu subjektive und objektive Messungen der körperlichen Aktivität von 2- bis 10-jährigen Kindern aus der europaweiten IDEFICS-Studie. Die objektive Messung körperlicher Aktivität erfolgte für N = 9980 Kinder mit Akzelerometern. Es wird hier ein Verfahren beschrieben, mit dem Informationen aus Bewegungstagebüchern zu Nichttragezeiten berücksichtigt werden können, um so die Akzelerometerdaten anzureichern und damit insgesamt die Beschreibung des kindlichen Bewegungsverhaltens zu verbessern.

Summary

Identification of typical movement contexts of children as the starting points for the promotion of physical activity: Overview of a BMG-sponsored project

We present a project that aims at identifying the context where children aged 2–10 years are physically active; to find starting points for the promotion of physical activity and therefore prevent childhood obesity. In this regard, subjective and objective measurements of physical activity of children participating in the European IDEFICS study are combined.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Ahrens W, Bammann K, Siani A. et al. The IDEFICS cohort: design, characteristics and participation in the baseline survey. International Journal of Obesity 2011; 35 Suppl 1: 3-15
  • 2 Ahrens W, Pigeot I, Pohlabeln H. et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in European children below the age of 10. International Journal of Obesity 2014; 38 Suppl 2: 99-107
  • 3 Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M. et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 2003; 35: 1381-1395
  • 4 De Henauw S, Baranowski T, Pigeot I (Hrsg.). Special Issue: Prevention of childhood obesity: Results from the IDEFICS study. Obesity Reviews 2015; 16 Suppl 2: 1-174
  • 5 De Meester F, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Deforche B. et al. Measuring physical activity using accelerometry in 13–15-year-old adolescents: the importance of including non-wear activities. Public Health Nutrition 2011; 14: 2124-2133
  • 6 Ekelund U, Tomkinson GR, Armstrong N. What proportion of youth are physically active? Measurement issues, levels and recent time trends. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2011; 45: 859-865
  • 7 Helmerhorst HJ F, Brage S, Warren J. et al. A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2012; 9: 103
  • 8 Janssen I, Leblanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2010; 7: 40
  • 9 Jimenez-Pavon D, Kelly J, Reilly JJ. Associations between objectively measured habitual physical activity and adiposity in children and adolescents: Systematic review. International Journal of Pediatric Obesity 2010; 5: 3-18
  • 10 Konstabel K, Veidebaum T, Verbestel V. et al. Objectively measured physical activity in European children: the IDEFICS study. International Journal of Obesity 2014; 38 Suppl 2: 135-143
  • 11 Metcalf B, Henley W, Wilkin T. Effectiveness of intervention on physical activity of children: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials with objectively measured outcomes (EarlyBird 54). BMJ 2012; 345: e5888
  • 12 Rauner A, Mess F, Woll A. The relationship between physical activity, physical fitness and overweight in adolescents: a syste-matic review of studies published in or after 2000. BMC Pediatrics 2013; 13: 19
  • 13 Reilly JJ, Penpraze V, Hislop J. et al. Objective measurement of physical activity and sedentary behaviour: review with new data. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2008; 93: 614-619
  • 14 Ridley K, Ainsworth BE, Olds TS. Development of a compendium of energy expenditures for youth. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2008; 5: 45
  • 15 Sprengeler O, Wirsik N, Hebestreit A. et al. Domain-Specific Self-Reported and Objectively Measured Physical Activity in Children. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2017; 14: 242
  • 16 Trost SG. State of the art reviews: measurement of physical activity in children and adolescents. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine 2007; 1: 299-314
  • 17 Westerterp KR. Assessment of physical activity: a critical appraisal. European Journal of Applied Physiology 2009; 105: 823-828