CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2017; 05(08): E754-E762
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-111592
Original article
Eigentümer und Copyright ©Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017

Survey study on the practice patterns in the endoscopic management of malignant distal biliary obstruction

Dennis Yang
1   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
,
Yaseen B. Perbtani
1   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
,
Qi An
2   Department of Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
,
Mitali Agarwal
3   Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
,
Michael Riverso
1   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
,
Joydeep Chakraborty
3   Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
,
Tony S. Brar
3   Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
,
Donevan Westerveld
3   Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
,
Han Zhang
3   Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
,
Shailendra S. Chauhan
4   CHS Digestive Health, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA
,
Christopher E. Forsmark
1   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
,
Peter V. Draganov
1   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 03 January 2017

accepted after revision 23 March 2017

Publication Date:
07 August 2017 (online)

Abstract

Background and study aim Endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) is a common practice. Controversy persists with regard to its role in resectable MDBO, the optimal technical method and type of stent. The aim of this study was to evaluate practice patterns in the treatment of MDBO among endoscopists with varying levels of experience and practice backgrounds.

Methods Electronic survey distributed to members of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). The main outcome measures included practice setting (academic vs. community), volume of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs), reasons for endoscopic drainage in MDBO, and technical approach.

Results A total of 335 subjects (54 % community-based endoscopists) completed the survey. Most academic physicians (69 %) reported performing ≥ 150 ERCPs annually compared to 18.8 % of community physicians (P < 0.001). In aggregate, 13.1 % of respondents performed ERCP in resectable MDBO because of surgeon preference or as the standard of care at their institution. The use of metal vs. plastic stents in MDBO varied based on practice setting. Routine sphincterotomy for MDBO was more common among community (78 %) vs academic endoscopists (61.1 %) (P < 0.001). Over half (58 %) of the subjects avoided covering the cystic duct take-off during stenting MDBO if there was a gallbladder in situ.

Conclusion There is significant variability in practice patterns for the treatment of MDBO. In spite of the recent ASGE guideline recommendations, some patients with resectable MDBO still undergo preoperative ERCP. Current clinical practices are not clearly supported by available data and underscore the need to increase adherence to gastrointestinal societal recommendations and an evidence-based approach to standardized patient care.

 
  • References

  • 1 Roque J, Ho SH, Goh KL. Preoperative drainage for malignant biliary strictures: is it time for self-expanding metallic stents?. Clin Endosc 2015; 48: 8-14
  • 2 Pu LZ, Singh R, Loong CK. et al. Malignant biliary obstruction: evidence for best practice. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2016; 2016: 3296801
  • 3 Almadi MA, Barkun JS, Barkun AN. Stenting in malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2015; 25: 691-711
  • 4 Van der Gaag NA, Rauws EA, van Eijck CH. et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. NEJM 2010; 362: 129-137
  • 5 Fang Y, Gurusamy KS, Wang Q. et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on safety and efficacy of biliary drainage before surgery for obstructive jaundice. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 1589-1596
  • 6 Velanovich V, Kheibek T, Khan M. Relationship of postoperative complications from preoperative biliary stents after pancreaticoduodenectomy. A new cohort analysis and meta-analysis of modern studies. JOP 2009; 10: 24-29
  • 7 Hong SK, Jang JY, Kang MJ. et al. Comparison of clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness after various preoperative biliary drainage methods in periampullary cancer with obstructive jaundice. J Korean Med Sci 2012; 27: 356-362
  • 8 Qiu YD, Bai JL, Xu FG. et al. Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on malignant obstructive jaundice: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 391-396
  • 9 Sewnath ME, Karsten TM, Prins MH. et al. A meta-analysis on the efficacy of peroperative biliary drainage for tumors causing obstructive jaundice. Ann Surg 2002; 236: 17-27
  • 10 ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Eloubeidi MA, Decker GA. et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of patients with solid pancreatic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 17-28
  • 11 Lai EC, Lau SH, Lau WY. The current status of preoperative biliary drainage for patients who receive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma: a comprehensive review. Surgeon 2014; 12: 290-296
  • 12 Bonin EA, Baron TH. Preoperative biliary stents in pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2011; 18: 621-629
  • 13 Rustagi T, Jamidar PA. Endoscopic treatment of malignant biliary strictures. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2015; 17: 3
  • 14 Morris S, Gurusamy KS, Sheringham J. et al. Cost-effectiveness of preoperative biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice in pancreatic and periampullary cancer. J Surg Res 2015; 193: 202-209
  • 15 Siddiqui AA, Mehendiratta V, Loren D. et al. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) for preoperative biliary decompression in patients with resectable and borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer: outcomes in 241 patients. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58: 1744-1750
  • 16 Aadam AA, Evans DB, Khan A. et al. Efficacy and safety of self-expandable metal stents for biliary decompression in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 67-75
  • 17 Saleem A, Leggett CL, Murad MH. et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trial comparing the patency of covered and uncovered self-expandable metal stents for palliation of distal malignant bile duct obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 321-327
  • 18 Almadi MA, Barkun AN, Martel M. No benefit of covered vs uncovered self-expandable metal stents in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 27-37
  • 19 Lee JH, Kirshna SG, Singh A. et al. Comparison of the utility of covered metal stents versus uncovered metal stents in the management of malignant biliary strictures in 749 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 312-324
  • 20 Shimizu S, Naitoh I, Nakazawa T. et al. Predictive factors for pancreatitis and cholecystitis in endoscopic covered metal stenting for distal malignant biliary obstruction. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 28: 68-72
  • 21 Isayama H, Kawabe T, Nakai Y. et al. Cholecystitis after metallic stent placement in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 1148-1153
  • 22 Artifon EL, Sakai P, Ishioka S. Endoscopic sphincterotomy before deployment of covered metal stent is associated with greater complication rate: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 42: 815-819
  • 23 Banerjee H, Hilden K, Baron TH. et al. Endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy is not required for transpapillary SEMS placement for biliary obstruction. Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56: 591-595
  • 24 Hayashi T, Kawakami H, Osanai M. et al. No benefit of endoscopic sphincterotomy before biliary placement of self-expandable metal stents for unresectable pancreatic cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 1151-1158