A feasibility study of photoacoustic imaging of ex vivo endoscopic mucosal resection tissues from Barrett’s esophagus patients

Abstract

Background and study aims Accurate endoscopic detection of dysplasia in patients with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) remains a major clinical challenge. The current standard is to take multiple biopsies under endoscopic image guidance, but this leaves the majority of the tissue unsampled, leading to significant risk of missing dysplasia. Furthermore, determining whether there is submucosal invasion is essential for proper staging. Hence, there is a clinical need for a rapid in vivo wide-field imaging method to identify dysplasia in BE, with the capability of imaging beyond the mucosal layer. We conducted an ex vivo feasibility study using photoacoustic imaging (PAI) in patients undergoing endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for known dysplasia. The objective was to characterize the esophageal microvascular pattern, with the long-term goal of performing in vivo endoscopic PAI for dysplasia detection and therapeutic guidance.

Materials and methods EMR tissues were mounted luminal side up. The tissues were scanned over a field of view of 14 mm (width) by 15 mm (depth) at 680, 750, and 850 nm (40 MHz acoustic central frequency). Ultrasound and photoacoustic images were simultaneously acquired. Tissues were then sliced and fixed in formalin for histopathology with hematoxylin and eosin staining. A total of 13 EMR specimens from eight patients were included in the analysis, which consisted of co-registration of the photoacoustic images with corresponding pathologist-classified histological images. We conducted mean difference test of the total hemoglobin distribution between tissue classes.

Results Dysplastic and nondysplastic BE can be distinguished from squamous tissue in 84 % of region-of-interest comparisons (42/50). However, the ability of intrinsic PAI to distinguish dysplasia from NDBE, which is the clinically important challenge, was only about 33 % (10/30).

Conclusion We demonstrated the technical feasibility of this approach. Based on our ex vivo data, changes in total hemoglobin content from intrinsic PAI (i. e. without exogenous contrast) can differentiate BE from squamous esophageal mucosa. However, most likely intrinsic PAI is unable to differentiate dysplastic from nondysplastic BE with adequate sensitivity for clinical translation.

• References

• 1 Canada Cancer Society. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2014. Available from: http://www.cancer.ca/en/support-and-services/resources/publications/ Accessed 24 Feb 2015
• 2 American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2015. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts-figures/ Accessed 24 Feb 2015
• 3 Solaymani-Dodaran M, Logan RFA, West J. et al. Risk of oesophageal cancer in Barrett’s oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal reflux. Gut 2004; 53: 1070-1074
• 4 Shaheen NJ, Richter JE. Barrett’s oesophagus. Lancet 2009; 373: 850-861
• 5 Schnell TG, Sontag SJ, Chejfec G. et al. Long-term nonsurgical management of Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia. Gastroenterology 2001; 120: 1607-1619
• 6 Reid BJ, Levine DS, Longton G. et al. Predictors of progression to cancer in Barrett’s esophagus: baseline histology and flow cytometry identify low- and high-risk patient subsets. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 1669-1676
• 7 Vennalaganti PR, Naag KanakadandiV, Gross SA. et al. Inter-observer agreement among pathologists using wide-area transepithelial sampling with computer-assisted analysis in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 1257-1260
• 8 Haisley KR, Dolan JP, Olson SB. et al. Sponge sampling with fluorescent in situ hybridization as a screening tool for the early detection of esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2017; 21: 215-221
• 9 Mannath J, Ragunath K. Role of endoscopy in early oesophageal cancer. Nat Publ Gr 2016; 13: 720-730
• 10 Douplik A, Zanati S, Saiko G. et al. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy in Barrett’s Esophagus: developing a large field-of-view screening method discriminating dysplasia from metaplasia. J Biophotonics 2014; 7: 304-311
• 11 Kara M, DaCosta RS, Wilson BC. et al. Autofluorescence-based detection of early neoplasia in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Dig Dis 2004; 22: 134-141
• 12 Messmann H, Endlicher E, Freunek G. et al. Fluorescence endoscopy for the detection of low and high grade dysplasia in ulcerative colitis using systemic or local 5-aminolaevulinic acid sensitisation. Gut 2003; 52: 1003-1007
• 13 Bergholt MS, Zheng W, Lin K. et al. In vivo diagnosis of esophageal cancer using image-guided Raman endoscopy and biomolecular modeling. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2011; 10: 103-112
• 14 Yang VXD, Tang SJ, Gordon ML. et al. Endoscopic Doppler optical coherence tomography in the human GI tract: Initial experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 879-890
• 15 Bouma B, Tearney G. High-resolution imaging of the human esophagus and stomach in vivo using optical coherence tomography. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 467-474
• 16 Singh R, Shahzad MA, Tam W. et al. Preliminary feasibility study using a novel narrow-band imaging system with dual focus magnification capability in Barrett’s esophagus: Is the time ripe to abandon random biopsies?. Dig Endosc 2013; 25: 151-156
• 17 Georgakoudi I, Jacobson BC, Van Dam J. et al. Fluorescence, reflectance, and light-scattering spectroscopy for evaluating dysplasia in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 2001; 120: 1620-1629
• 18 Raica M, Cimpean AM, Ribatti D. Angiogenesis in pre-malignant conditions. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 1924-1934
• 19 Hanahan D, Folkman J. Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis. Cell 1996; 86: 353-364
• 20 Kim C, Erpelding TN, Jankovic L. et al. Deeply penetrating in vivo photoacoustic imaging using a clinical ultrasound array system. Biomed Opt Express 2010; 1: 278-284
• 21 Xu M, Wang LV. Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine. Rev Sci Instrum 2006; 77: 41101
• 22 Lim L, Streutker CJ, Marcon N. et al. Clinical study of ex vivo photoacoustic imaging in endoscopic mucosal resection tissues. Proc SPIE 2015; 9323: 932307
• 23 Needles A, Heinmiller A, Sun J. et al. Development and initial application of a fully integrated photoacoustic micro-ultrasound system. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2013; 60: 888-897
• 24 Conio M, Ponchon T, Blanchi S. et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 653-663
• 25 Lovell JF, Jin CS, Huynh E. et al. Porphysome nanovesicles generated by porphyrin bilayers for use as multimodal biophotonic contrast agents. Nat Mater 2011; 10: 324-332
• 26 Ng KK, Shakiba M, Huynh E. et al. Stimuli-responsive photoacoustic nanoswitch for in vivo sensing applications. ACS Nano 2014; 8: 8363-8373
• 27 Laser Institute of America. American national standard for safe use of lasers ANSI Z136.1—2014. Orlando: Laser Inst Am; 2014
• 28 Laufer J, Elwell C, Delpy D. et al. In vitro measurements of absolute blood oxygen saturation using pulsed near-infrared photoacoustic spectroscopy: accuracy and resolution. Phys Med Biol 2005; 50: 4409-4428
• 29 Wang X, Xie X, Ku G. et al. Noninvasive imaging of hemoglobin concentration and oxygenation in the rat brain using high-resolution photoacoustic tomography. J Biomed Opt 2006; 11: 24015
• 30 Maslov K, Sivaramakrishnan M, Zhang HF. et al. Technical considerations in quantitative blood oxygenation measurement using photoacoustic microscopy in vivo. Proc SPIE, Photons Plus Ultrasound Imaging Sens 2006; 6086: 60860R1
• 31 Cox BT, Arridge SR, Beard PC. Estimating chromophore distributions from multiwavelength photoacoustic images. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2009; 26: 443-455
• 32 Laufer J, Delpy D, Elwell C. et al. Quantitative spatially resolved measurement of tissue chromophore concentrations using photoacoustic spectroscopy: application to the measurement of blood oxygenation and haemoglobin concentration. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52: 141-168
• 33 Lim L, Nichols B, Migden MR. et al. Clinical study of noninvasive in vivo melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers using multimodal spectral diagnosis. J Biomed Opt 2014; 19: 117003
• 34 Kerkhof M, Van Dekken H, Steyerberg EW. et al. Grading of dysplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus: substantial interobserver variation between general and gastrointestinal pathologists. Histopathology 2007; 50: 920-927
• 35 Yang J-M, Li C, Chen R. et al. Catheter-based photoacoustic endoscope. J Biomed Opt 2014; 19: 66001