Z Orthop Unfall 2017; 155(05): 549-555
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-114418
Aus den Sektionen – AE Deutsche Gesellschaft für Endoprothetik
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Was ist ein Muss in der präoperativen Diagnostik vor elektiver Endoprothetik?

Pre-operative Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty – What is Essential?
Holger Haas
Zentrum für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Sportmedizin, Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Sankt Elisabeth, Sankt Petrus, Sankt Johannes gGmbH, Bonn
,
Christian D. Weber
Zentrum für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Sportmedizin, Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Sankt Elisabeth, Sankt Petrus, Sankt Johannes gGmbH, Bonn
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
03. August 2017 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Im Vorfeld einer elektiven Endoprothesenimplantation sind diagnostische Maßnahmen erforderlich. Diese haben das Ziel, die patientenbezogene und eingriffsbezogene Risikokonstellation zu erfassen und durch die Einleitung geeigneter prä- und perioperativer Maßnahmen mögliche Komplikationen zu vermeiden bzw. deren Auftretenswahrscheinlichkeit zu reduzieren. Daneben dient die klinische und bildgebende Untersuchung des Patienten der Indikationsstellung zum Eingriff, die jedoch nicht Thema des vorliegenden Beitrags ist.

Ziel der Arbeit Die aktuelle Literatur zur präoperativen Diagnostik vor elektiven endoprothetischen Eingriffen wurde analysiert.

Methode Eine selektive Literaturrecherche wurde durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse Wir identifizierten studienbasierte Empfehlungen hinsichtlich (1) präoperativer Anämie, (2) Optimierung der Stoffwechsellage, (3) Gewichtskontrolle, (4) Schlafapnoesyndrom, (5) MRSA-Problematik und Hautdekontamination, (6) Harnwegsinfektion, (7) dentales Screening, (8) kardiologischer Diagnostik, (9) technisch-planerischen Vorbereitungen, insbesondere der Revisionsendoprothetik.

Schlussfolgerung Auch wenn nicht zu allen präoperativen diagnostischen Maßnahmen belastbare evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen vorliegen, bestehen bereits klare Anforderungen an die präoperative Diagnostik elektiver Patienten vor endoprothetischen Eingriffen. Die zunehmende Fokussierung auf erweiterte Maßnahmen im Rahmen des perioperativen Managements wird den Umfang notwendiger Untersuchungen im Vorfeld dieser Operationen erhöhen.

Abstract

Background A thorough pre-operative evaluation is required prior to total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The objective of screening is to identify patient- and procedure-related risk constellations. Pre-operative diagnostic measures are vital in order to anticipate, reduce or even eliminate threats to patient safety. Furthermore, the clinical and radiographical workup may confirm the indication and type of surgical procedure, but this is not the subject of this article.

Objective An overview of the current literature on pre-operative diagnostic principles is presented.

Methods A selective literature analysis was performed.

Results We identified recommendations related to the following: (1) preoperative anaemia, (2) metabolic optimisation, (3) weight control, (4) obstructive sleep apnoea, (5) MRSA and skin decontamination, (6) urinary tract infections (UTI), (7) dental screening (8) cardiological workup, (9) technical considerations on primary and revision arthroplasty.

Conclusion While clear evidence-based recommendations for every item are not yet available, a critical pre-operative evaluation including history taking, physical exam, laboratory tests and imaging studies remains essential. The ongoing evolution of improved perioperative care and implications for patient safety will further increase the scope of necessary preoperative diagnostic measures.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Pedersen AB, Mehnert F, Sorensen HT. et al. The risk of venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, stroke, major bleeding and death in patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement: a 15-year retrospective cohort study of routine clinical practice. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B: 479-485
  • 2 Huddleston JI, Maloney WJ, Wang Y. et al. Adverse events after total knee arthroplasty: a national Medicare study. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24: 95-100
  • 3 Boraiah S, Joo L, Inneh IA. et al. Management of modifiable risk factors prior to primary hip and knee arthroplasty: a readmission risk assessment tool. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97: 1921-1928
  • 4 Maoz G, Phillips M, Bosco J. et al. The Otto Aufranc Award: modifiable versus nonmodifiable risk factors for infection after hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473: 453-459
  • 5 Clelland C, Worland RL, Jessup DE. et al. Preoperative medical evaluation in patients having joint replacement surgery: added benefits. South Med J 1996; 89: 958-960
  • 6 Phruetthiphat OA, Gao Y, Vasta S. et al. Preoperative risk factors for, and incidence of delayed surgery in elective primary total knee arthroplasty after hospital admission: the ACS-NSQIP. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31: 1413-1416
  • 7 Nesslage R, Radtke K, Hohloch L. et al. [Influence of comorbidities on revision rate within the first year after primary total hip arthroplasty]. Z Orthop Unfall 2017; 155: 194-200
  • 8 Guralnik JM, Ershler WB, Schrier SL. et al. Anemia in the elderly: a public health crisis in hematology. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2005; 528-532
  • 9 Goodnough LT, Vizmeg K, Sobecks R. et al. Prevalence and classification of anemia in elective orthopedic surgery patients: implications for blood conservation programs. Vox Sang 1992; 63: 90-95
  • 10 Lee JH, Han SB. Patient blood management in hip replacement arthroplasty. Hip Pelvis 2015; 27: 201-208
  • 11 Styron JF, Klika AK, Szubski CR. et al. Relative efficacy of tranexamic acid and preoperative anemia treatment for reducing transfusions in total joint arthroplasty. Transfusion 2017; 57: 622-629
  • 12 Ng VY, Lustenberger D, Hoang K. et al. Preoperative risk stratification and risk reduction for total joint reconstruction: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95: e19(1–15)
  • 13 Stryker LS, Abdel MP, Morrey ME. et al. Elevated postoperative blood glucose and preoperative hemoglobin A1C are associated with increased wound complications following total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95: 808-814 s801–802
  • 14 Zmistowski B, Dizdarevic I, Jacovides CL. et al. Patients with uncontrolled components of metabolic syndrome have increased risk of complications following total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28: 904-907
  • 15 Chrastil J, Anderson MB, Stevens V. et al. Is hemoglobin A1c or perioperative hyperglycemia predictive of periprosthetic joint infection or death following primary total joint arthroplasty?. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30: 1197-1202
  • 16 Bohl DD, Shen MR, Kayupov E. et al. Is hypoalbuminemia associated with septic failure and acute infection after revision total joint arthroplasty? A study of 4517 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31: 963-967
  • 17 Morey VM, Song YD, Whang JS. et al. Can serum albumin level and total lymphocyte count be surrogates for malnutrition to predict wound complications after total knee arthroplasty?. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31: 1317-1321
  • 18 Fu MC, DʼAmbrosia C, McLawhorn AS. et al. Malnutrition increases with obesity and is a stronger independent risk factor for postoperative complications: a propensity-adjusted analysis of total hip arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31: 2415-2421
  • 19 Haynes J, Nam D, Barrack RL. Obesity in total hip arthroplasty: does it make a difference?. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B: 31-36
  • 20 Wagner ER, Kamath AF, Fruth K. et al. Effect of body mass index on reoperation and complications after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98: 2052-2060
  • 21 Kath G, Perka C, Thiele K. [Risk of hip dislocation – which patients need special treatment?]. Z Orthop Unfall 2016; 154: 385-391
  • 22 Inacio MC, Kritz-Silverstein D, Raman R. et al. The impact of pre-operative weight loss on incidence of surgical site infection and readmission rates after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29: 458-464.e1
  • 23 Severson EP, Singh JA, Browne JA. et al. Total knee arthroplasty in morbidly obese patients treated with bariatric surgery: a comparative study. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27: 1696-1700
  • 24 Smith TO, Aboelmagd T, Hing CB. et al. Does bariatric surgery prior to total hip or knee arthroplasty reduce post-operative complications and improve clinical outcomes for obese patients? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B: 1160-1166
  • 25 Berend KR, Ajluni AF, Nunez-Garcia LA. et al. Prevalence and management of obstructive sleep apnea in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25: 54-57
  • 26 Bixler EO, Vgontzas AN, Ten Have T. et al. Effects of age on sleep apnea in men: I. Prevalence and severity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157: 144-148
  • 27 Duran J, Esnaola S, Rubio R. et al. Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea and related clinical features in a population-based sample of subjects aged 30 to 70 yr. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163: 685-689
  • 28 [Anonymous] Practice parameters for the indications for polysomnography and related procedures. Polysomnography Task Force, American Sleep Disorders Association Standards of Practice Committee. Sleep 1997; 20: 406-422
  • 29 Chung SA, Yuan H, Chung F. A systemic review of obstructive sleep apnea and its implications for anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 1543-1563
  • 30 Kim DH, Spencer M, Davidson SM. et al. Institutional prescreening for detection and eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92: 1820-1826
  • 31 Sporer SM, Rogers T, Abella L. Methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization to reduce surgical site infection in elective total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31: 144-147
  • 32 Burke JP. Infection control – a problem for patient safety. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 651-656
  • 33 Cordero-Ampuero J, Gonzalez-Fernandez E, Martinez-Velez D. et al. Are antibiotics necessary in hip arthroplasty with asymptomatic bacteriuria? Seeding risk with/without treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471: 3822-3829
  • 34 Gou W, Chen J, Jia Y. et al. Preoperative asymptomatic leucocyturia and early prosthetic joint infections in patients undergoing joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29: 473-476
  • 35 Bohl DD, Sershon RA, Fillingham YA. et al. Incidence, risk factors, and sources of sepsis following total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31: 2875-2879.e2
  • 36 DʼAmbrosia RD, Shoji H, Heater R. Secondarily infected total joint replacements by hematogenous spread. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976; 58: 450-453
  • 37 Bouvet C, Lubbeke A, Bandi C. et al. Is there any benefit in pre-operative urinary analysis before elective total joint replacement?. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B: 390-394
  • 38 Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1645-1654
  • 39 Berbari EF, Osmon DR, Carr A. et al. Dental procedures as risk factors for prosthetic hip or knee infection: a hospital-based prospective case-control study. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 50: 8-16
  • 40 Tai TW, Lin TC, Ho CJ. et al. Frequent dental scaling is associated with a reduced risk of periprosthetic infection following total knee arthroplasty: a nationwide population-based nested case-control study. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0158096
  • 41 Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA. et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 1707-1732
  • 42 Shah CK, Keswani A, Boodaie BD. et al. Myocardial infarction risk in arthroplasty vs. arthroscopy: how much does procedure type matter?. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 246-251
  • 43 Danesh J, Wheeler JG, Hirschfield GM. et al. C-reactive protein and other circulating markers of inflammation in the prediction of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1387-1397
  • 44 Pfitzner T, Krocker D, Perka C. et al. [C-reactive protein. An independent risk factor for the development of infection after primary arthroplasty]. Orthopade 2008; 37: 1116-1120
  • 45 Long G, Hao C, Li G. et al. Predictive value of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) for adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). J Orthop Sci 2016; 21: 826-830
  • 46 Waterman BR, Belmont jr. PJ, Bader JO. et al. The total joint arthroplasty cardiac risk index for predicting perioperative myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest after primary total knee and hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31: 1170-1174
  • 47 Crowe B, Payne A, Evangelista PJ. et al. Risk factors for infection following total knee arthroplasty: a series of 3836 cases from one institution. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30: 2275-2278
  • 48 Kirschner S, Hamann C, Handreka S. et al. [Templating and radiological outcome monitoring for elective total hip arthroplasty. Applied quality management principles for safe patient care]. Unfallchirurg 2011; 114: 776-785
  • 49 Günther KP, Hamann C, Stiehler M. et al. Die „Standardendoprothese“ am Hüftgelenk – Teil 1. Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie up2date 2012; 7: 275-284
  • 50 Heller KD. [Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection – whatʼs obligation, whatʼs optional?]. Z Orthop Unfall 2016; 154: 398-405
  • 51 Zmistowski BM, Manrique J, Patel R. et al. Recurrent periprosthetic joint infection after irrigation and debridement with component retention is most often due to identical organisms. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31: 148-151