Klinische Neurophysiologie 2017; 48(03): 132-137
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-115157
Originalia
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Fibrillationen und Faszikulationen bei der Evaluation neuromuskulärer Patienten

Fibrillations and Fasciculations in the Evaluation of Neuromuscular Patients
Peter Pöschl
1   Klinik für Neurologie, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 July 2017 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Fibrillationen und Faszikulationen spielen bei einer Vielzahl neuromuskulärer Erkrankungen eine bedeutende Rolle. Es handelt sich um unwillkürliche, spontan auftretende Muskelfaserdepolarisationen, die bei der Beurteilung neuromuskulärer Patienten eine wichtige diagnostische und differenzialdiagnostische Bedeutung haben. Neben der klinischen Beobachtung unwillkürlicher Muskelaktivität durch Inspektion stehen mit der Elektromyografie (EMG) und der Muskelsonografie diagnostische Verfahren zur Verfügung, die die Detektion dieser Aktivität erleichtern. Die Muskelsonografie kann Faszikulationen zuverlässiger erfassen als die EMG. Die Zuordnung zu einem krankhaften oder physiologischen Krankheitsbild gelingt jedoch besser mittels EMG, da diese Methode zusätzliche neurogene Veränderungen nachweisen kann. Ob Fibrillationen tatsächlich in der Muskelsonografie dargestellt werden können ist nicht sicher geklärt.

Abstract

Fibrillations and fasciculations play an important role in neuromuscular disease. They represent involuntary spontaneous discharges of muscle components. In the workup of neuromuscular patients, the detection of fibrillations or fasciculations is of high relevance for diagnostic and differential diagnostic reasons. Electromyography (EMG) and in recent years also muscle sonography are valuable tools to increase the diagnostic yield besides clinical inspection of the patient. While sonography has a higher sensitivity for detection of fasciculations, EMG provides information on further pathological alterations of the muscle, too. This enables the interpretation of fasciculations in a pathological or physiological context. It is not clear so far whether fibrillations can be visualized by sonography.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Sibernagl S, Despopoulos A. Taschenatlas der Physiologie. 3.Auflage Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag; 1998. 34
  • 2 Buchthal F, Schmalbruch H. Motor unit of mammalian muscle. Physiol Rev. 1980; 60: 90-142
  • 3 Schulte-Mattler WJ, Georgiadis D, Zierz S. Discharge patterns of spontaneous activity and motor units on concentric needle electromyography. Muscle Nerve 2001; 24: 123-126
  • 4 Kimura J. Electrodiagnosis in diseases of nerve and Muscle: Principles And Practice. Ed 3 New York: Oxford University Press; 2001: 346-362
  • 5 Bischoff C, Schulte-Mattler WJ, Conrad B. Das EMG-Buch. 2. Auflage Stuttgart: Thieme; 2005: 4-13
  • 6 Pillen S, Nienhuis M, van Dijk JP. et al. Muscles alive: ultrasound detects fibrillations. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009; 120: 932-936
  • 7 van Alfen N, Nienhuis M, Zwarts MJ. et al. Detection of fibrillations using muscle ultrasound: diagnostic accuracy and identification of pitfalls. Muscle Nerve. 2011; 43: 178-182
  • 8 Forster F, Alpers B. Site of origin of fasciculations in voluntary muscle. Arch Neurol Psychiat 1944; 51: 264
  • 9 Denny-Brown D. Interpretation of the electromyogram. Arch Neurol Psychiat 1949; 61: 99-128
  • 10 Conradi S, Grimby L, Lundemo G. Pathophysiology of fasciculations in ALS as studied by electromyography of single motor units. Muscle Nerve 1982; 5: 202-208
  • 11 Denny-Brown D, Pennybacker J. Fibrillation and fasciculation in voluntary muscle. Brain 1938; 61: 311-334
  • 12 de Carvalho M. Pathophysiological significance of fasciculations in the early diagnosis of ALS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 2000; 1 (Suppl. 01) S43-S46
  • 13 Lambert EH, Mulder DW. Electromyographic studies in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin 1957; 32: 441-446
  • 14 Mitsikostas DD, Karandreas N, Coutsopetras P. et al. Fasciculation potentials in healthy people. Muscle Nerve 1998; 21: 533-535
  • 15 Simon NG, Kiernan MC. Fasciculation anxiety syndrome in clinicians. J Neurol 2013; 260: 1743-1747
  • 16 Brooks BR. El Escorial World Federation of Neurology criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Subcommittee on Motor Neuron Diseases/Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis of the World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Neuromuscular Diseases and the El Escorial “Clinical limits of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis” workshop contributors. J Neurol Sci 1994; 124 Suppl: 96-107
  • 17 Wilbourn AJ. Clinical neurophysiology in the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: the Lambert and the El Escorial criteria. J Neurol Sci 1998; 160 Suppl1: S25-S29
  • 18 de Carvalho M, Dengler R, Eisen A. et al. Electrodiagnostic criteria for diagnosis of ALS. Clinical Neurophysiology 2008; 119: 497-503
  • 19 de Carvalho M, Swash M. Fasciculation potentials: a study of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other neurogenic disorders. Muscle Nerve 1998; 21: 336-344
  • 20 Mills KR. Characteristics of fasciculations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and the benign fasciculation syndrome. Brain 2010; 133: 3458-3469
  • 21 Walker FO, Donofrio PD, Harpold GJ. et al. Sonographic imaging of muscle contraction and fasciculations: a correlation with electromyography. Muscle Nerve 1990; 13: 33-39
  • 22 Krämer HH, Vlazak A, Döring K. et al. Excellent interrater agreement for the differentiation of fasciculations and artefacts - a dynamic myosonography study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014; 125: 2441-2445
  • 23 Noto YI, Shibuya K, Shahrizaila N et al. Detection of fasciculations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: The optimal ultrasound scan time. Muscle Nerve. 2017. Epub ahead of print
  • 24 Grimm A, Prell T, Décard BF. et al. Muscle ultrasonography as an additional diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009; 120: 843-844