Endoscopy 2017; 49(12): 1243-1250
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-116015
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Didactic training vs. computer-based self-learning in the prediction of diminutive colon polyp histology by trainees: a randomized controlled study

Taimur Khan*
1   Gastroenterology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, United States
,
Birtukan Cinnor*
2   Gastroenterology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
,
Neil Gupta
3   Gastroenterology, Loyola University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States
,
Lindsay Hosford
2   Gastroenterology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
,
Ajay Bansal
4   Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Mojtaba S. Olyaee
1   Gastroenterology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, United States
,
Sachin Wani
2   Gastroenterology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
,
Amit Rastogi
1   Gastroenterology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, United States
4   Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 01 March 2017

accepted after revision 08 June 2017

Publication Date:
14 August 2017 (online)

Abstract

Background and study aim Experts can accurately predict diminutive polyp histology, but the ideal method to train nonexperts is not known. The aim of the study was to compare accuracy in diminutive polyp histology characterization using narrow-band imaging (NBI) between participants undergoing classroom didactic training vs. computer-based self-learning.

Participants and methods Trainees at two institutions were randomized to classroom didactic training or computer-based self-learning. In didactic training, experienced endoscopists reviewed a presentation on NBI patterns for adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps and 40 NBI videos, along with interactive discussion. The self-learning group reviewed the same presentation of 40 teaching videos independently, without interactive discussion. A total of 40 testing videos of diminutive polyps under NBI were then evaluated by both groups. Performance characteristics were calculated by comparing predicted and actual histology. Fisher’s exact test was used and P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results A total of 17 trainees participated (8 didactic training and 9 self-learning). A larger proportion of polyps were diagnosed with high confidence in the classroom group (66.5 % vs. 50.8 %; P < 0.01), although sensitivity (86.9 % vs. 95.0 %) and accuracy (85.7 % vs. 93.9 %) of high-confidence predictions were higher in the self-learning group. However, there was no difference in overall accuracy of histology characterization (83.4 % vs. 87.2 %; P = 0.19). Similar results were noted when comparing sensitivity and specificity between the groups.

Conclusion The self-learning group showed results on a par with or, for high-confidence predictions, even slightly superior to classroom didactic training for predicting diminutive polyp histology. This approach can help in widespread training and clinical implementation of real-time polyp histology characterization.

* These authors contributed equally to this work.


 
  • References

  • 1 Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J. et al. Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 1100-1105
  • 2 Aldridge AJ, Simson JN. Histological assessment of colorectal adenomas by size. Are polyps less than 10 mm in size clinically important?. Eur J Surg 2001; 167: 777-781
  • 3 Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I. et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2191-2200
  • 4 Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Rex DK. A resect and discard strategy would improve cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 865-869
  • 5 Ignjatovic A, East JE, Suzuki N. et al. Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10: 1171-1178
  • 6 Ignjatovic A, East JE, Guenther T. et al. What is the most reliable imaging modality for small colonic polyp characterization? Study of white-light, autofluorescence, and narrow-band imaging. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 94-99
  • 7 Singh R, Bhat YM, Thurairajah PH. et al. Is narrow band imaging superior to high-definition white light endoscopy in the assessment of diminutive colorectal polyps?. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 28: 472-478
  • 8 McGill SK, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP. et al. Narrow band imaging to differentiate neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps in real time: a meta-analysis of diagnostic operating characteristics. Gut 2013; 62: 1704-1713
  • 9 Wu L, Li Y, Li Z. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of narrow-band imaging for the differentiation of neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps: a meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 3-11
  • 10 Sakamoto T, Matsuda T, Aoki T. et al. Time saving with narrow-band imaging for distinguishing between neoplastic and non-neoplastic small colorectal lesions. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 27: 351-355
  • 11 Chiu HM, Chang CY, Chen CC. et al. A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Gut 2007; 56: 373-379
  • 12 Su MY, Hsu CM, Ho YP. et al. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and narrow-band imaging systems in differential diagnosis of neoplastic and nonneoplastic colonic polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 2711-2716
  • 13 Rastogi A, Bansal A, Wani S. et al. Narrow-band imaging colonoscopy – a pilot feasibility study for the detection of polyps and correlation of surface patterns with polyp histologic diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 280-286
  • 14 Rastogi A, Pondugula K, Bansal A. et al. Recognition of surface mucosal and vascular patterns of colon polyps by using narrow-band imaging: interobserver and intraobserver agreement and prediction of polyp histology. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 716-722
  • 15 Paggi S, Rondonotti E, Amato A. et al. Resect and discard strategy in clinical practice: a prospective cohort study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 899-904
  • 16 ASGE Technology Committee, Abu Dayyeh BK, Thosani N et al. ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 502 e1 – e16
  • 17 Rex DK. Narrow-band imaging without optical magnification for histologic analysis of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 1174-1181
  • 18 Rastogi A, Keighley J, Singh V. et al. High accuracy of narrow band imaging without magnification for the real-time characterization of polyp histology and its comparison with high-definition white light colonoscopy: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2422-2430
  • 19 Sikka S, Ringold DA, Jonnalagadda S. et al. Comparison of white light and narrow band high definition images in predicting colon polyp histology, using standard colonoscopes without optical magnification. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 818-822
  • 20 Sinh P, Gupta N, Rao DS. et al. Community gastroenterologists can learn diminutive colon polyp histology characterization with narrow band imaging by a computer-based teaching module. Dig Endosc 2015; 27: 374-380
  • 21 Patel SG, Rastogi A, Austin G. et al. Gastroenterology trainees can easily learn histologic characterization of diminutive colorectal polyps with narrow band imaging. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 997-1003 e1
  • 22 Rastogi A. Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyp histology with high-definition colonoscopy using narrow band imaging. Clin Endosc 2013; 46: 120-129
  • 23 Rex DK, Alikhan M, Cummings O. et al. Accuracy of pathologic interpretation of colorectal polyps by general pathologists in community practice. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 468-474
  • 24 Denis B, Peters C, Chapelain C. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of community pathologists in the interpretation of colorectal polyps. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 21: 1153-1160
  • 25 Kessler WR, Imperiale TF, Klein RW. et al. A quantitative assessment of the risks and cost savings of forgoing histologic examination of diminutive polyps. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 683-691
  • 26 Raghavendra M, Hewett DG, Rex DK. Differentiating adenomas from hyperplastic colorectal polyps: narrow-band imaging can be learned in 20 minutes. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 572-576
  • 27 Rastogi A, Rao DS, Gupta N. et al. Impact of a computer-based teaching module on characterization of diminutive colon polyps by using narrow-band imaging by non-experts in academic and community practice: a video-based study. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 390-398
  • 28 Ignjatovic A, Thomas-Gibson S, East JE. et al. Development and validation of a training module on the use of narrow-band imaging in differentiation of small adenomas from hyperplastic colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 128-133