Download PDF
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2017; 85(09): 541-551
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-117885
Originalarbeit
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Sensorik Inventar (SI) – Selbstbeurteilung der sensorischen Sensitivität für Erwachsene und Jugendliche

Sensory Inventory (SI): self-assessment of sensory sensitivity for adults and adolescents
Vera Zamoscik
1   Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Mannheim, Abteilung Klinische Psychologie, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg
,
Christine Niemeyer
2   Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Hygiene
,
Martin Fungisai Gerchen
1   Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Mannheim, Abteilung Klinische Psychologie, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg
,
Sabrina Christina Fenske
1   Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Mannheim, Abteilung Klinische Psychologie, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg
,
Michael Witthöft
3   Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Abteilung für Klinische Psychologie, Psychotherapie und Experimentelle Psychopathologie
,
Peter Kirsch
1   Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Mannheim, Abteilung Klinische Psychologie, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

04/04/2017

07/31/2017

Publication Date:
07 September 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Eine adäquate Wahrnehmung der Umwelt repräsentiert eine der Grundvoraussetzungen adaptiven Verhaltens. Gleichzeitig existieren individuelle Unterschiede in der sensorischen Sensitivität, die wiederum eine zentrale Rolle bei der Entstehung und Aufrechterhaltung diverser psychischer Störungen spielen können. Die Fragestellung war die Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zur multidimensionalen Erfassung von sensorischer Sensitivität. Das Sensorik Inventar (SI) wurde von 1417 Personen ausgefüllt. Die faktorielle Validität wurde mit Hilfe explorativer Faktorenanalysen sowie mit Exploratory-Structural-Equation-Modeling überprüft. Es ergab sich eine 6-faktorielle Struktur und eine hohe interne Konsistenz sowie Retestreliabilität. Probanden mit psychischen Störungen zeigten überwiegend verstärkte sensorische Sensitivitäten und eine geringere Körperwahrnehmung. Das SI stellt ein kurzes und im Forschungs- und Klinikalltag leicht zu integrierendes Instrument mit guten psychometrischen Eigenschaften dar.

Abstract

An adequate perception of the environment is one of the main foundations of adaptive behavior. Furthermore, sensory sensitivity varies from person to person and can play a central role in the development and course of mental disorders. The objective was the development of a questionnaire for the multidimensional assessment of sensory sensitivity. A total of 1417 persons were evaluated with the Sensory Inventory (SI). The factorial validity was tested with exploratory factor analyses and exploratory structural equation modeling. A 6-factorial structure was established. High internal consistency and retest reliability were shown, as well as increased sensory sensitivity and lower body perception in participants with mental disorders. The SI is a short instrument with good test characteristics that can easily be integrated in a clinical or research environment.

Schlüsselwörter

Sensorik - Sensitivität - Selbstbeurteilung - psychische Störung

Key words

sensory systems - sensitivity - self-assessment - mental disorder
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Aron EN, Aron A. Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of personality and social psychology 1997; 73: 345
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Satow A. Four properties common among perceptions confirmed by a large sample of subjects: An ecological approach to mechanisms of individual differences in perception. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1987; 64: 507-520
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Zopf R, Contini E, Fowler C. et al. Body distortions in Anorexia Nervosa: Evidence for changed processing of multisensory bodily signals. Psychiatry Res 2016; 245: 473-481
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lufi D, Tzischinsky O. The relationships between sensory modulation and sleep among adolescents with ADHD. J Atten Disord 2014; 18: 646-653
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Zamoscik V, Huffziger S, Kühner C. et al. Die Rolle der sensorischen Empfindsamkeit bei Depression: Hinweise aus dem Default Mode Netzwerk. In, Tagung Psychologie und Gehirn. Frankfurt: 2015
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bohus M, Limberger M, Ebner U. et al. Pain perception during self-reported distress and calmness in patients with borderline personality disorder and self-mutilating behavior. Psychiatry Res 2000; 95: 251-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Dyer A, Borgmann E, Feldmann Jr RE. et al. Body image disturbance in patients with borderline personality disorder: impact of eating disorders and perceived childhood sexual abuse. Body image 2013; 10: 220-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ludäscher P, Valerius G, Stiglmayr C. et al. Pain sensitivity and neural processing during dissociative states in patients with borderline personality disorder with and without comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder: a pilot study. Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience: JPN 2010; 35: 177-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Niedtfeld I, Kirsch P, Schulze L. et al. Functional connectivity of pain-mediated affect regulation in Borderline Personality Disorder. PLoS One 2012; 7: e33293
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Schmahl C, Bohus M, Esposito F. et al. Neural correlates of antinociception in borderline personality disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006; 63: 659-667
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Freedman R, Adler LE, Waldo MC. et al. Neurophysiological evidence for a defect in inhibitory pathways in schizophrenia: comparison of medicated and drug-free patients. Biol Psychiatry 1983; 18: 537-551
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bramon E, Rabe-Hesketh S, Sham P. et al. Meta-analysis of the P 300 and P 50 waveforms in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia research 2004; 70: 315-329
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Potter D, Summerfelt A, Gold J. et al. Review of clinical correlates of P 50 sensory gating abnormalities in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia bulletin 2006; 32: 692-700
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hazlett EA, Rothstein EG, Ferreira R. et al. Sensory gating disturbances in the spectrum: similarities and differences in schizotypal personality disorder and schizophrenia. Schizophrenia research 2015; 161: 283-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Braff DL, Geyer MA, Light GA. et al. Impact of prepulse characteristics on the detection of sensorimotor gating deficits in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia research 2001; 49: 171-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Freedman R, Waldo M, Bickford-Wimer P. et al. Elementary neuronal dysfunctions in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia research 1991; 4: 233-243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Smucny J, Olincy A, Eichman LC. et al. Early sensory processing deficits predict sensitivity to distraction in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia research 2013; 147: 196-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lane SJ, Reynolds S, Dumenci L. Sensory overresponsivity and anxiety in typically developing children and children with autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: cause or coexistence?. Am J Occup Ther 2012; 66: 595-603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Zamoscik V, Mier D, Schmidt SNL. et al. Early Memories of Individuals on the Autism Spectrum Assessed Using Online Self-Reports. Front Psychiatry 2016; 7: 79
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hilton CL, Harper JD, Kueker RH. et al. Sensory responsiveness as a predictor of social severity in children with high functioning autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 2010; 40: 937-945
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 APA. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Brown C, Tollefson N, Dunn W. et al. The Adult Sensory Profile: measuring patterns of sensory processing. Am J Occup Ther 2001; 55: 75-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Smolewska KA, McCabe SB, Woody EZ. A psychometric evaluation of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale: The components of sensory-processing sensitivity and their relation to the BIS/BAS and „Big Five“. Personality and Individual Differences 2006; 40: 1269-1279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Blanche EI, Parham D, Chang M. et al. Development of an adult sensory processing scale (ASPS). Am J Occup Ther 2014; 68: 531-538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Mehling WE, Price C, Daubenmier JJ. et al. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). PLoS One 2012; 7: e48230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kiesswetter E, Sietmann B, Zupanic M. et al. Verhaltenstoxikologische Aspekte der Prävalenz und Ätiologie „multipler chemischer Sensitivität“. Allergologie 1999; 22: 719-735
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Jung YH, Lee US, Jang JH. et al. Effects of Mind-Body Training on Personality and Behavioral Activation and Inhibition System According to BDNF Val66Met Polymorphism. Psychiatry investigation 2016; 13: 333-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Scheydt S, Laimbacher S, Wenger A. et al. Das Verständnis von Reizüberflutung im Kontext psychischer Störungen. Ergebnisse einer Delphi-Studie. Pflegewissenschaft 2016; 18: 251-258
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Hartweg V, Milbradt A, Zimmerhofer A. et al. testMaker – a computer software for web-based assessments. In. testMaker 3.3p4 ed. Aachen: RWTH Aachen University, Department of Industrial and Organizational Psychology; 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Loranger AW, Sartorius N, Andreoli A. et al. The International Personality Disorder Examination. The World Health Organization/Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration international pilot study of personality disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994; 51: 215-224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Carver CS, White TL. Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994; 67: 319-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Strobel A, Beauducel A, Debener S. et al. Eine deutschsprachige Version des BIS/BAS-Fragebogens von Carver und White [A German version of Carver and White‘s BIS/BAS questionnaire]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 2001; 22: 216-227
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Costa Jr PT, McCrae RR. The NEO PI/FFI manual supplement. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1989
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Borkenau P, Ostendorf F. NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar (NEO-FFI) nach Costa und McCrae. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Kolarik AJ, Scarfe AC, Moore BC. et al. Blindness enhances auditory obstacle circumvention: Assessing echolocation, sensory substitution, and visual-based navigation. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0175750
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Heimler B, Pavani F. Response speed advantage for vision does not extend to touch in early deaf adults. Exp Brain Res 2014; 232: 1335-1341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Aizenman AM, Gold JM, Sekuler R. Multisensory integration in short-term memory: Musicians do rock. Neuroscience. 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.04.031
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Prescott TJ, Diamond ME, Wing AM. Active touch sensing. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B. Biological sciences 2011; 366: 2989-2995
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Allen MS, Walter EE. Personality and body image: A systematic review. Body image 2016; 19: 79-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Banos RM, Escobar P, Cebolla A. et al. Using Virtual Reality to Distract Overweight Children from Bodily Sensations During Exercise. Cyberpsychology,. behavior and social networking 2016; 19: 115-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Russ MJ, Shearin EN, Clarkin JF. et al. Subtypes of self-injurious patients with borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1993; 150: 1869-1871
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Ludäscher P, Bohus M, Lieb K. et al. Elevated pain thresholds correlate with dissociation and aversive arousal in patients with borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry Res 2007; 149: 291-296
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Brown MZ, Comtois KA, Linehan MM. Reasons for suicide attempts and nonsuicidal self-injury in women with borderline personality disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 2002; 111: 198-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Young KA, Bonkale WL, Holcomb LA. et al. Major depression, 5HTTLPR genotype, suicide and antidepressant influences on thalamic volume. Br J Psychiatry 2008; 192: 285-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Cullen KR, Vizueta N, Thomas KM. et al. Amygdala functional connectivity in young women with borderline personality disorder. Brain Connect 2011; 1: 61-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Xia S, Li X, Kimball AE. et al. Thalamic shape and connectivity abnormalities in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Res 2012; 204: 161-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Murphy ER, Foss-Feig J, Kenworthy L. et al. Atypical Functional Connectivity of the Amygdala in Childhood Autism Spectrum Disorders during Spontaneous Attention to Eye-Gaze. Autism Res Treat 2012; 2012: 652408
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Vandewalle G, Hebert M, Beaulieu C. et al. Abnormal hypothalamic response to light in seasonal affective disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2011; 70: 954-961
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar