PDF herunterladen
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2017; 126(11): 568-576
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-119628
Fortbildung | Endodontologie
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endodontische Sekundärbehandlung: Warum? Wann? Wie?

Matthias Widbiller
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
23. November 2017 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Die Erhaltung der eigenen Zähne ist heute sowohl aus zahnärztlicher Sicht als auch aufseiten des Patienten von zentraler Bedeutung. So wird der endodontischen Therapie immer häufiger der Vorzug vor prothetischen und implantologischen Alternativen gegeben. Wenn auch die überwiegende Mehrzahl endodontischer Primärbehandlungen erfolgreich verläuft, können sich im Rahmen der Nachkontrollen persistierende oder neu entstandene Entzündungen zeigen, die eine endodontische Sekundärbehandlung notwendig machen.
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Sathorn C, Parashos P. Monitoring the outcomes of root canal re-treatments. Endodontic Topics 2011; 19: 153-162
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J 2006; 921-930
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ray HA, Trope M. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J 1995; 28: 12-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Song M, Park M, Lee CY. et al. Periapical status related to the quality of coronal restorations and root fillings in a Korean population. J Endod 2014; 40: 182-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Reit C. Decision strategies in endodontics: on the design of a recall program. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987; 3: 233-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Torabinejad M, Corr R, Handysides R. et al. Outcomes of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery: a systematic review. J Endod 2009; 35: 930-937
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kvist T, Reit C. Results of endodontic retreatment: a randomized clinical study comparing surgical and nonsurgical procedures. J Endod 1999; 25: 814-817
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 AAE Special Committee to Develop a Microscope Position Paper. AAE Position Statement. Use of microscopes and other magnification techniques. J Endod 2012; 38: 1153-1155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006; 32: 389-398
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling J. et al. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod 2009; 35: 791-804
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Senges C, Wrbas KT, Altenburger M. et al. Bacterial and Candida albicans adhesion on different root canal filling materials and sealers. J Endod 2011; 37: 1247-1252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gomes C, Fidel S, Fidel R. et al. Isolation and taxonomy of filamentous fungi in endodontic infections. J Endod 2010; 36: 626-629
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rôças IN, Hülsmann M, Siqueira JF. Microorganisms in root canal-treated teeth from a German population. J Endod 2008; 34: 926-931
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Gomes BP, Vianna ME, Zaia AA. et al. Chlorhexidine in endodontics. Braz Dent J 2013; 24: 89-102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Mohammadi Z, Abbott PV. The properties and applications of chlorhexidine in endodontics. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 288-302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Dametto FR, Ferraz CC, Gomes BP. et al. In vitro assessment of the immediate and prolonged antimicrobial action of chlorhexidine gel as an endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99: 768-772
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Radcliffe CE, Potouridou L, Qureshi R. et al. Antimicrobial activity of varying concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on the endodontic microorganisms Actinomyces israelii, A. naeslundii, Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J 2004; 37: 438-446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Vianna ME. et al. In vitro antimicrobial activity of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J 2001; 34: 424-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Waltimo TM, Orstavik D, Sirén EK. et al. In vitro susceptibility of Candida albicans to four disinfectants and their combinations. Int Endod J 1999; 32: 421-429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Friedman S, Mor C. The success of endodontic therapy-healing and functionality. J Calif Dent Assoc 2004; 32: 493-503
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Scelza MF, Coil JM, Maciel AC. et al. Comparative SEM evaluation of three solvents used in endodontic retreatment: an ex vivo study. J Appl Oral Sci 2008; 16: 24-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Cavenago BC, Ordinola-Zapata R, Duarte MA. et al. Efficacy of xylene and passive ultrasonic irrigation on remaining root filling material during retreatment of anatomically complex teeth. Int Endod J 2014; 47: 1078-1083
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Jain M, Singhal A, Gurtu A. et al. Influence of ultrasonic irrigation and chloroform on cleanliness of dentinal tubules during endodontic retreatment – an in vitro SEM Study. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9: ZC11-ZC15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Royzenblat A, Goodell GG. Comparison of removal times of Thermafil plastic obturators using ProFile rotary instruments at different rotational speeds in moderately curved canals. J Endod 2007; 33: 256-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hargreaves KM, Berman LH. Cohenʼs Pathways of the Pulp. 11th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Hülsmann M, Schäfer E. Probleme in der Endodontie. Berlin: Quintessenz; 2006
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Bargholz C, Hör D, Zirkel C. Praxisleitfaden Endodontie. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2006
    Google Scholar