Endoscopy 2018; 50(01): 8-13
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-119986
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Hot avulsion may be effective as salvage treatment for focal Barrett’s esophagus remaining after endoscopic therapy for dysplasia or early cancer: a preliminary study

Javier Aranda-Hernández
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, The Center of Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Oncology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Yuto Shimamura
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, The Center of Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Oncology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Andrea Grin
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, The Center of Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Oncology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Yugo Iwaya
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, The Center of Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Oncology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Maria Cirocco
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, The Center of Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Oncology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Gabor Kandel
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, The Center of Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Oncology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Gary May
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, The Center of Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Oncology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Paul Kortan
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, The Center of Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Oncology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Spiro Raftopoulos
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, The Center of Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Oncology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
,
Norman Marcon
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, The Center of Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Oncology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 25 April 2017

accepted after revision 30 August 2017

Publication Date:
24 October 2017 (online)

Background and study aim Both endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are used to treat Barrett’s esophagus (BE) complicated by dysplasia and intramucosal cancer. However, focal areas of BE can remain after otherwise successful application of these techniques. We report the results of hot avulsion using a hot biopsy forceps to resect these residual focal areas.

Patients and methods This was a retrospective study from a prospective database in a tertiary reference center from August 2013 to May 2015. All included patients had undergone hot avulsion for eradication of residual focal areas of BE that were ≤ 1 cm and not suspicious for dysplasia, following at least one previous endoscopic treatment for dysplasia or intramucosal cancer.

Results 35 patients harboring 124 residual areas of 1 – 7 mm were treated with hot avulsion. After a mean follow-up of 17.4 months, all patients achieved complete eradication of residual focal BE. One of the patients required a second hot avulsion treatment. Hot avulsion provided samples in all cases but limited the assessment of dysplasia (cautery artifact) in 20.2 % of them. The only complication was bleeding in two patients, which was easily stopped by soft coagulation.

Conclusions Hot avulsion appears to be effective and safe in removing focal BE ≤ 1 cm at its greatest length remaining after endoscopic treatment for dysplasia or early cancer. Further studies are required before this technique can be considered the standard of care.

 
  • References

  • 1 Moss A, Bourke MJ, Hourigan LF. et al. Endoscopic resection for Barrett’s high-grade dysplasia and early esophageal adenocarcinoma: an essential staging procedure with long-term therapeutic benefit. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 1276-1283
  • 2 Pech O, Behrens A, May A. et al. Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut 2008; 57: 1200-1206
  • 3 Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG. et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and management of Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111: 30-50
  • 4 Spechler SJ, Sharma P, Souza RF. et al. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the management of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 18-52
  • 5 Fitzgerald RC, di Pietro M, Ragunath K. et al. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut 2014; 63: 7-42
  • 6 Veerappan SG, Ormonde D, Yusoff IF. et al. Hot avulsion: a modification of an existing technique for management of nonlifting areas of a polyp (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 884-888
  • 7 Bassan MS, Cirocco M, Kandel G. et al. A second chance at EMR: the avulsion technique to complete resection within areas of submucosal fibrosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 757
  • 8 Andrawes S, Haber G. Avulsion: a novel technique to achieve complete resection of difficult colon polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 167-168
  • 9 Li N, Pasricha S, Bulsiewicz WJ. et al. Effects of preceding endoscopic mucosal resection on the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for treatment of Barrett’s esophagus: results from the United States Radiofrequency Ablation Registry. Dis Esophagus 2016; 29: 537-543
  • 10 Gupta M, Iyer PG, Lutzke L. et al. Recurrence of esophageal intestinal metaplasia after endoscopic mucosal resection and radiofrequency ablation of Barrett’s esophagus: results from a US Multicenter Consortium. Gastroenterology 2013; 145: 79-86
  • 11 Anders M, Bahr C, El-Masry MA. et al. Long-term recurrence of neoplasia and Barrett’s epithelium after complete endoscopic resection. Gut 2014; 63: 1535-1543
  • 12 Gray NA, Odze RD, Spechler SJ. Buried metaplasia after endoscopic ablation of Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 1899-1908
  • 13 Phoa KN, Pouw RE, Van vil SteredFG. et al. Remission of Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasm 5 years after radiofrequency ablation with endoscopic resection: a Netherlands cohort study. Gastroenterology 2013; 145: 96-104
  • 14 Mino-Kenudson M, Ban S, Ohana M. et al. Buried dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma arising in barrett esophagus after porfimer-photodynamic therapy. Am J Surg Pathol 2007; 31: 403-409
  • 15 Pouw RE, Visser M, Odze RD. et al. Pseudo-buried Barrett’s post radiofrequency ablation for Barrett’s esophagus, with or without prior endoscopic resection. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 105-109