Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-123818
A rare case of gastric wall abscess arising after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass
Publication History
Publication Date:
09 April 2018 (online)
A 55-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of a 7-month history of upper abdominal pain. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan showed a solid mass occupying the body and tail of the pancreas ([Fig. 1 a]). To make a more definitive diagnosis, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was carried out with a 22-gauge needle (EchoTip Ultra HD; Wilson-Cook Medical Inc., Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA). In total, five passes were completed using a fanning technique. Pathological examination of the collected tissue revealed severe atypical epithelial cells, and adenocarcinoma was suspected ([Fig. 1 b]). Combined with MRI images, we clinically diagnosed pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
One week later, the patient developed increasing upper abdominal pain with high fever. Laboratory examination showed a white blood cell count of 6020 cells/μL and an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) level of 182.7 mg/dL. Computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a hypoattenuating mass in the posterior stomach wall ([Fig. 1 c]). The patient was diagnosed with a gastric wall abscess that developed after EUS-FNA. Antibiotic therapy with meropenem was started, but after 3 days the response was poor. Therefore, endoscopic drainage was initiated.
A hook knife (KD-620QR HookKnife; Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan) was used to make an incision in the mucosa ([Fig. 1 d, e], [Video 1]). Two days after endoscopic drainage, the abdominal pain and fever disappeared, and the CRP level decreased to normal ranges. A second CT scan on the 10th day after endoscopic therapy showed that the abscess had completely disappeared ([Fig. 1 f]).
Video 1 Endoscopic treatment of a gastric wall abscess. Sufficient drainage of pus was made by exposing the abscess cavity with a hook knife and pressing a transparent cap against the gastric wall.
Quality:
The main postoperative complications of EUS-FNA include bleeding, perforation, infection, and acute pancreatitis, with a total morbidity of 1.2 % [1]. Infectious complications associated with EUS-FNA of solid lesions are infrequent, with an incidence of 0 – 0.6 % [2] [3]. Abscess of the stomach wall arising from EUS-FNA is extremely rare. From our experience, endoscopic incision and drainage seems to be an efficient treatment for such complication.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CPL_1AL_2AD
Endoscopy E-Videos is a free access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online.
This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos
-
References
- 1 Polkowski M, Larghi A, Weynand B. et al. Learning, techniques, and complications of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline. Endoscopy 2011; 44: 190-206
- 2 Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A, Varadarajulu S. et al. Frequency of major complications after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 622-629
- 3 Levy MJ, Norton ID, Clain JE. et al. Prospective study of bacteremia and complications with EUS FNA of rectal and perirectal lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 684-689