Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery, Inhaltsverzeichnis Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2023; 36(04): 285-286DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-57232 Review Article The Quality Dilemma Autoren Institutsangaben Scott R. Steele 1 Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio Artikel empfehlen Abstract Artikel einzeln kaufen(opens in new window) Volltext Referenzen References 1 Cook A, Hyman N. Quality assessment and improvement in colon and rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47 (12) 2195-2201 2 Patwardhan M, Fisher DA, Mantyh CR. et al. Assessing the quality of colorectal cancer care: do we have appropriate quality measures? (A systematic review of literature). J Eval Clin Pract 2007; 13 (06) 831-845 3 Galandiuk S, Rao MK, Heine MF, Scherm MJ, Polk Jr HC. Mutual reporting of process and outcomes enhances quality outcomes for colon and rectal resections. Surgery 2004; 136 (04) 833-841 4 McGory ML, Shekelle PG, Ko CY. Development of quality indicators for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98 (22) 1623-1633 5 Cirocco WC, Steele SR, Buie WD. Advancing standards of rectal cancer care: lessons from Europe adapted to the vast expanse of North America. Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57 (02) 260-266 6 Arndt KR, Dombek GE, Allar BG. et al. Impact of National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer guidelines on surgical margin status. Surg Oncol 2023; Online ahead of print 7 Brady JT, Bingmer K, Bliggenstorfer J. et al; Consortium for Optimizing the Treatment of Rectal Cancer (OSTRiCh). Could meeting the standards of the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer in the National Cancer Database improve patient outcomes?. Colorectal Dis 2023. Online ahead of print
