Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2018; 50(01): 33-38
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-101405
Übersichtsartikel
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Ästhetische Faktoren in der kieferorthopädischen Planung

Esthetic Factors in Orthodontic Treatment Planning
Josef A. Feldner
1   Abteilung für Kieferorthopädie, Universitätszahnklinik Wien, Österreich
,
Hans-Peter Bantleon
1   Abteilung für Kieferorthopädie, Universitätszahnklinik Wien, Österreich
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 March 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Ziel des Artikels ist eine möglichst kompakte Zusammenfassung der wichtigsten Faktoren im Zusammenhang mit Ästhetik in der kieferorthopädischen Behandlungsplanung zu geben. Dabei wurde das Thema in 3 Teilbereiche aufgegliedert, nämlich die Makro-, Mikro- und die Mini-Ästhetik. In den einzelnen Unterpunkten wird dargelegt, welche klinischen Auffälligkeiten im Zuge der diagnostischen Erstuntersuchung erfasst werden sollten, um ein möglichst ästhetisch hochwertiges Planungskonzept zu erstellen und schlussendlich ebenso ein ästhetisch ansprechendes Ergebnis zu erreichen.

Abstract

The aim of this article is to give a short but decisive summary of the most important guidelines concerning orthodontic planning, with special emphasis on the analysis of esthetic components. In order to create a treatment plan that will prove esthetically satisfactory the article is divided into 3 subdivisions: Macro, micro and mini esthetics. These subdivisions provide a guideline to the most important esthetic issues the orthodontist should consider during clinical examination.

Schlüsselwörter

Makro-Ästhetik - Mikro-Ästhetik - Mini-Ästhetik

Key words

macro esthetics - micro esthetics - mini esthetics
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Tsao D. A dedicated system for processing faces. Science 2006; 314: 71-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bauer W, Diedrich P. The motivation and assesment of the success of adult patient undergoing orthodontic treatment. The interpretation of a questionnaire. Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 1990; 180-188
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Levin E. Dental esthetics and golden proportion. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1978; 40: 244-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Vig PS, Hewitt AB. Asymmetry of the Human Facial Skeleton. The Angle Orthodontist 1975; 45: 125-1289
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Farkas LG. Anthropometry of the head and face in Medicin. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Kolar JC. et al. Vertical and Horizontal Proportions of the Face in Young Adult North American Caucasians: Revision of Neoclassical Canons. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1985; 75: 328-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics 5 2013; 164
    PubMed
  • 8 Ricketts RM. Esthetics, environment, and law of lip relation. American Journal of Orthodontics 1968; 54: 271-289
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Viazis AD. A new measurment of profile esthetics. Journal of clinical orthodontics 1991; 25: 15-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Springer NC, Chang C, Fields HW. et al. Smile esthetics from the patients perspective. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2011; 139: 91-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Chang C, Springer NC, Fields HW. Smile esthetics from patients perspective for faces of varying attractivness. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2011; 140: 171-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: Part 2 smile analysis and treatment strategies. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2003; 124: 116-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics 2013; 163
    PubMed
  • 14 Kokich V. Esthetics and anterior tooth position: An orthodontic perspective part II: Vertical position. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 1993; 5: 174-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ker AJ, Chan R, Fields HW. et al. Esthetic ans smile characteristics from the laypersons`s perspective: A computer-based survey study. Journal American Dental Association 2008; 139: 1318-1327
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Dickens ST, Sarver DM, Proffit WR. Change in frontal soft tissue dimensions of the lower face by age and gender. World Journal of Orthodontics 2002; 3: 313-320
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Parekh S, Fields HW, Rosenstiel S. et al. Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and layman. The Angle Orthodontist 2006; 76: 612-618
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Sarver DM. Principles of cosmetic dentistry in orthodontics: Part 1. Shape and proportionality of anterior teeth. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2004; 126: 749-753
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics 5 2013; 173
    PubMed
  • 20 Kokich V, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 1999; 11: 311-324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kokich V, Kinzer AG. Managing cogenitally missing lateral incisors. Part I: Canine substitution. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 2005; 17: 5-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Zachrisson BU. Interdental papilla reconstruction in adult orthodontics. World Journal of Orthodontics 2004; 5: 67-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar