Acesso à coluna lombossacral: Visão atual

Resumo

A abordagem cirúrgica da coluna lombossacral tem sido objeto de estudos anatômicos experimentais e científicos desde a era hipocrática. Contudo, foi no século XX que, com a evolução da assepsia e da antibioticoterapia, a cirurgia da coluna começou a evoluir em velocidade vertiginosa e as diversas possibilidades de vias de acesso tornaram-se objetos de desenvolvimento e discussão. Desta forma, as doenças da coluna lombossacral podem ser acessadas de diferentes maneiras e posições, desde a abordagem posterior tradicional em decúbito ventral até as abordagens anterior, oblíqua, lateral e endoscópica. O presente artigo traz vias de acesso de última geração para a coluna lombossacral. O objetivo deste artigo é elucidar as possibilidades de acesso à coluna lombar para quaisquer finalidades, como descompressão, fusão, ressecções tumorais, reconstrução ou correção de deformidades, independentemente do tipo de implante ou seu posicionamento.

Palavras-chave

artrodese - coluna vertebral/cirurgia - fusão vertebral - região lombossacral

• Referências

• 1 Lee SH, Jeong SK, Bae J. Evolution of Spine Surgery as a Request of Endoscopic and Microscopic Laser to Technology. In: Bae J, Lee SH. editors. Laser Spine Surgery. Springer, Singapore; 2021: 1-8 . Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2206-9_1
• 2 Jones ET, Pickett JC. An operation for progressive spinal deformities. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; (229) 2-3
• 3 Capener N. Spondylolisthesis. Br J Surg 1932; 19 (75) 374-386
• 4 de Kunder SL, Rijkers K, Caelers IJMH, de Bie RA, Koehler PJ, van Santbrink H. Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Historical Overview and a Future Perspective. Spine 2018; 43 (16) 1161-1168
• 5 Mayer HM. A History of Endoscopic Lumbar Spine Surgery: What Have We Learnt?. BioMed Res Int 2019; 2019: 4583943
• 6 Allain J, Dufour T. Anterior lumbar fusion techniques: ALIF, OLIF, DLIF, LLIF, IXLIF. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2020; 106 (1S): S149-S157
• 7 Goodrich JT. History of spine surgery in the ancient and medieval worlds. Neurosurgical focus 2004; 16 (01) 1-13
• 8 Hides JA, Stokes MJ, Saide M, Jull GA, Cooper DH. Evidence of lumbar multifidus muscle wasting ipsilateral to symptoms in patients with acute/subacute low back pain. Spine 1994; 19 (02) 165-172
• 9 Posterior approach. Accessed November 16, 2022. Available from: https://surgeryreference.aofoundation.org/spine/deformities/adolescent-idiopathic-scoliosis/approach/posterior-approach
• 10 Gille O, Jolivet E, Dousset V. et al. Erector spinae muscle changes on magnetic resonance imaging following lumbar surgery through a posterior approach. Spine 2007; 32 (11) 1236-1241
• 11 He K, Head J, Mouchtouris N. et al. The Implications of Paraspinal Muscle Atrophy in Low Back Pain, Thoracolumbar Pathology, and Clinical Outcomes After Spine Surgery: A Review of the Literature. Global Spine J 2020; 10 (05) 657-666
• 12 Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis. Spine 1996; 21 (08) 941-944
• 13 Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Part 2: Histologic and histochemical analyses in humans. Spine 1994; 19 (22) 2598-2602
• 14 Watkins MB. Posterolateral fusion in pseudarthrosis and posterior element defects of the lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1964; 35 (35) 80-85
• 15 Wiltse LL. The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1973; 91 (91) 48-57
• 16 Palmer DK, Allen JL, Williams PA. et al. Multilevel magnetic resonance imaging analysis of multifidus-longissimus cleavage planes in the lumbar spine and potential clinical applications to Wiltse's paraspinal approach. Spine 2011; 36 (16) 1263-1267
• 17 Wiltse LL, Spencer CW. New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine 1988; 13 (06) 696-706
• 18 Street JT, Andrew Glennie R, Dea N. et al. A comparison of the Wiltse versus midline approaches in degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine 2016; 25 (03) 332-338
• 19 Guiroy A, Sícoli A, Masanés NG, Ciancio AM, Gagliardi M, Falavigna A. How to perform the Wiltse posterolateral spinal approach: Technical note. Surg Neurol Int 2018; 9: 38
• 20 Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 2006; 6 (04) 435-443
• 21 Li JX, Phan K, Mobbs R. Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Aspects, Operative Outcomes, and Complications. World Neurosurg 2017; 98: 113-123
• 22 Mai HT, Schneider AD, Alvarez AP. et al. Anatomic Considerations in the Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion: The Impact of Age, Sex, BMI, and Scoliosis. Clin Spine Surg 2019; 32 (05) 215-221
• 23 Watkins III RG, Watkins IV RG. Eds. Surgical Approaches to the Spine. New York, NY: Springer; 2015
• 24 Pawar A, Hughes A, Girardi F, Sama A, Lebl D, Cammisa F. Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Asian Spine J 2015; 9 (06) 978-983
• 25 Ito, HiroMu, JuNichi, Tsuchiya, Goichi Asami A new radical operation for Pott's disease: report of ten cases. JBJS 1934; 16 (03) 499-515
• 26 Brau SA. Mini-open approach to the spine for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: description of the procedure, results and complications. Spine J 2002; 2 (03) 216-223
• 27 Dias Pereira Filho AR. Technique for Exposing Lumbar Discs in Anterior Approach Using Steinmann Wires: Arthroplasties or Arthrodesis. World Neurosurg 2021; 148: 189-195
• 28 Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg 2015; 1 (01) 2-18
• 29 Wert Jr WG, Sellers W, Mariner D. et al. Identifying Risk Factors for Complications During Exposure for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Cureus 2021; 13 (07) e16792
• 30 Manunga J, Alcala C, Smith J. et al. Technical approach, outcomes, and exposure-related complications in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Vasc Surg 2021; 73 (03) 992-998
• 31 Xu DS, Walker CT, Godzik J, Turner JD, Smith W, Uribe JS. Minimally invasive anterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review. Ann Transl Med 2018; 6 (06) 104-104
• 32 Safaee MM, Tenorio A, Osorio JA. et al. The impact of obesity on perioperative complications in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2020; 33 (03) 1-10
• 33 Mayer HM. A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 1997; 22 (06) 691-699 , discussion 700
• 34 Silvestre C, Mac-Thiong JM, Hilmi R, Roussouly P. Complications and morbidities of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lumbar interbody fusion in 179 patients. Asian Spine J 2012; 6 (02) 89-97
• 35 OLIF Procedures | Medtronic. Accessed November 17, 2022. Available from: https://www.medtronic.com/us-en/healthcare-professionals/therapies-procedures/spinal-orthopaedic/olif.html
• 36 Molinares DM, Davis TT, Fung DA. Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs: an MRI study. J Neurosurg Spine 2016; 24 (02) 248-255
• 37 Zairi F, Sunna TP, Westwick HJ. et al. Mini-open oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) approach for multi-level discectomy and fusion involving L5-S1: Preliminary experience. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017; 103 (02) 295-299
• 38 Li R, Li X, Zhou H, Jiang W. Development and Application of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Orthop Surg 2020; 12 (02) 355-365
• 39 Hermantin FU, Peters T, Quartararo L, Kambin P. A prospective, randomized study comparing the results of open discectomy with those of video-assisted arthroscopic microdiscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81 (07) 958-965
• 40 Mayer HM, Brock M. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy: surgical technique and preliminary results compared to microsurgical discectomy. J Neurosurg 1993; 78 (02) 216-225
• 41 Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine 2008; 33 (09) 931-939
• 42 Nellensteijn J, Ostelo R, Bartels R, Peul W, van Royen B, van Tulder M. Transforaminal endoscopic surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniations: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2010; 19 (02) 181-204
• 43 Cong L, Zhu Y, Tu G. A meta-analysis of endoscopic discectomy versus open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disk herniation. Eur Spine J 2016; 25 (01) 134-143
• 44 Li XC, Zhong CF, Deng GB, Liang RW, Huang CM. Full-Endoscopic Procedures Versus Traditional Discectomy Surgery for Discectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Current Global Clinical Trials. Pain Physician 2016; 19 (03) 103-118
• 45 Ruan W, Feng F, Liu Z, Xie J, Cai L, Ping A. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: A meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2016; 31: 86-92
• 46 Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation after conventional discectomy: a prospective, randomized study comparing full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal versus microsurgical revision. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009; 22 (02) 122-129