The Normal Active Range of Motion of the Index, Middle, Ring, and Little Fingers in a Sample of Indian Population

Abstract

Background The normative data for finger range of motion (ROM) are not available for the Indian population. The aim of our study was to measure the active ROM of finger joints in normal healthy volunteers in a sample of Indian population.

Materials and Methods This is a prospective observational study conducted as a part of the Indian normative data project of the Indian Society for Surgery of the Hand (ISSH). The study included one participating center from four geographical regions of the country. Certified goniometers were used to measure the ROM of fingers in all centers. A standardized methodology was devised. A pilot study was done to assess the interobserver and intraobserver reliability, following which data were collected by one measurement.

Results This pilot study was performed in 20 hands that showed good interobserver and intraobserver reliability correlation. A total of 390 hands were measured in four participating centers. Active flexion of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint was the highest in the middle finger (86.6 ± 10.4 degrees) followed by the index finger (86.0 ± 9.2 degrees), little finger (85.0 ± 8.4 degrees), and ring finger (84.2 ± 8.6 degrees). The index finger (97.2 ± 16.9 degrees) showed maximum proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint flexion followed by the middle finger (96.2 ± 15.8 degrees), ring finger (96.0 ± 15.9 degrees), and little finger (91.8 ± 12.7 degrees). Distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint flexion increased from the index finger (81.6 ± 13.9 degrees) to the little finger (84.6 ± 12.9 degrees). The little finger MCP joint (26.3 ± 6.2 degrees) showed maximum extension followed by the index finger (25.7 ± 6.8 degrees), middle finger (24.7 ± 6.7 degrees) and ring finger (22.3 ± 7.1 degrees). The middle finger (15.6 ± 8.1 degrees) and ring finger (16.2 ± 8 degrees) had more PIP joint extension when compared to the index (13.7 ± 7.8 degrees) and little finger (13.2 ± 8.4 degrees). The ring finger (8.1 ± 6.8 degrees) and the middle finger (8.4 ± 6.9 degrees) had more DIP joint extension when compared with the index finger (6.0 ± 6.0 degrees) and the little finger (6.8 ± 6.7 degrees). Total active motion (TAM) of the middle finger (315.9 ± 31.0 degrees) was the maximum followed by the index finger (310.2 ± 27.3 degrees), ring finger (308.8 ± 29.1 degrees), and little finger (307.8 ± 25.2 degrees). Gender, body mass index (BMI), mother tongue, geographical location, and occupation were factors that had significant correlation, while no significant differences based on side, hand dominance, and age were noted.

Conclusion We have reported normative data of finger ROM and TAM for the index, middle, ring, and little fingers in the Indian population. Finger ROM in the Indian population is highly variable. The observed TAM in the Indian population is higher than what is reported earlier.

Keywords

finger range of motion - Indian normative data - total active motion

Note

Institutional review board clearance was obtained for the study individually at the four participating centers where the study was performed and the study protocols conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
01. August 2024

• References

• 1 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Joint Motion: Method of Measuring and Recording. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1965
• 2 Greene WB, Heckman JD. eds. The Clinical Measurement of Joint Motion. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1994
• 3 Cocchiarella L, Andersson G. American Medical Association. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. Chicago, IL: American Medical Publishing Association Press; 2001
• 4 International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand. Atlas of surface anatomy and joint motion. In: Leslie I. ed. IFSSH Terminology for Hand Surgery. 4th ed.. Philadelphia, PA: Harcourt Health Sciences; 2001: 38-56
• 5 Eatonhand.com. Normal range of motion reference values. Accessed October 2, 2021 at: https://www.eatonhand.com/nor/nor002.htm
• 6 Kapandji IA. The Physiology of the Joints. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1981: 156-173
• 7 Mallon WJ, Brown HR, Nunley JA. Digital ranges of motion: normal values in young adults. J Hand Surg Am 1991; 16 (05) 882-887
• 8 Skvarilová B, Plevková A. Ranges of joint motion of the adult hand. Acta Chir Plast 1996; 38 (02) 67-71
• 9 Smahel Z, Klímová A. The influence of age and exercise on the mobility of hand joints: 1: metacarpophalangeal joints of the three-phalangeal fingers. Acta Chir Plast 2004; 46 (03) 81-88
• 10 Ellis B, Bruton A, Goddard JR. Joint angle measurement: a comparative study of the reliability of goniometry and wire tracing for the hand. Clin Rehabil 1997; 11 (04) 314-320
• 11 Burr N, Pratt AL, Stott D. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability when measuring interphalangeal joints. Physiotherapy 2003; 89 (11) 641-652
• 12 Lewis E, Fors L, Tharion WJ. Interrater and intrarater reliability of finger goniometric measurements. Am J Occup Ther 2010; 64 (04) 555-561
• 13 Macionis V. Reliability of the standard goniometry and diagrammatic recording of finger joint angles: a comparative study with healthy subjects and non-professional raters. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013; 14 (01) 17
• 14 American Society of Hand Therapists. Clinical Assessment Recommendations. 2nd ed.. Mount Laurel, NJ: American Society of Hand Therapist; 1992
• 15 Bear-Lehman J, Abreu BC. Evaluating the hand: issues in reliability and validity. Phys Ther 1989; 69 (12) 1025-1033
• 16 De Smet L, Urlus M, Spriet A, Fabry G. Metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal flexion of the thumb: influence of sex and age, relation to ligamentous injury. Acta Orthop Belg 1993; 59 (04) 357-359
• 17 Smahel Z, Klímová A. The influence of age and exercise on the mobility of hand joints: 2: interphalangeal joints of the three phalangeal fingers. Acta Chir Plast 2004; 46 (04) 122-126
• 18 Zwerus EL, Willigenburg NW, Scholtes VA, Somford MP, Eygendaal D, van den Bekerom MP. Normative values and affecting factors for the elbow range of motion. Shoulder Elbow 2019; 11 (03) 215-224
• 19 Baker JL, Rotimi CN, Shriner D. Human ancestry correlates with language and reveals that race is not an objective genomic classifier. Sci Rep 2017; 7 (01) 1572
• 20 Kannabiran B. An analytical study on the finger flexion cascade in general population of various occupations. Orthoped Rheumatol 2015; 1 (01) 18-27
• 21 Varghese JG, Venugopal V, Srinivasan V, Priya GGH. A study on the normative values of finger flexion cascade in power grip users and non-power grip users. J Clin Diagn Res 2020; 14 (05) YC01-YC07