RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791947
Unpredictable Aortic Behavior in Identifying Risk Factors for Reintervention: A Prospective Cohort Study
Autoren
Abstract
Background
Although advancements in the management of thoracic aortic disease have led to a reduction in acute mortality, individuals requiring postoperative reintervention experience substantially worse long-term clinical outcomes and increased mortality. We aimed to identify the risk factors for postoperative reintervention in this high-risk population.
Patients and Methods
This prospective observational cohort study included patients who survived endovascular or open surgical treatment for thoracic aortic disease between January 2009 and June 2020. We excluded those with inflammatory or traumatic thoracic aortic diseases. The risk factors were identified using multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models.
Results
The study included 95 genetically tested patients aged 54.13 ± 12.13 years, comprising 67 men (70.53%) and 28 women (29.47%). Primary open surgery was performed in 74.7% and endovascular repair in 25.3% of the patients. Of these, 35.8% required one or more reinterventions at the time of follow-up (3 ± 2.5 years, mean ± standard deviation). The reintervention rate was higher in the endovascular repair group than in the open repair group. Among the potential risk factors, only residual aortic dissection emerged as an independent predictor of reintervention (odds ratio: 3.29, 95% confidence interval: 1.25–8.64).
Conclusion
Reintervention after primary thoracic aortic repair remains a significant clinical issue, even in high-volume tertiary centers. Close follow-up and personalized care at aortic centers are imperative. In our cohort of patients with thoracic aortic disease undergoing open or endovascular surgery, postoperative residual dissection was independently associated with the necessity of reintervention, emphasizing the importance of intensified clinical monitoring in these patients.
Authors' Contribution
M.E. and T.G. contributed to the conceptualization; M.E., T.C., and T.S. to methodology ; M.E. and J. L. L. to software; A.M, T.C., and T.S. to validation; M.E. and J.L.L. to formal analysis; T.G., A.M., and T.S. to investigation; T.G., J.L.L., and A.M. to resources; T.G., J.L.L., and A.M. to data curation; M.E. to writing—original draft preparation; T.C., T.S., J.L.L., and A.M. to writing—review and editing; A.M., T.C., and T. S. to supervision; and none to funding acquisition.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 16. April 2024
Angenommen: 24. September 2024
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
18. November 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Zhang L, Zhao Z, Chen Y. et al. Reintervention after endovascular repair for aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 152 (05) 1279-1288.e3
- 2 Rylski B, Beyersdorf F, Desai ND. et al. Distal aortic reintervention after surgery for acute DeBakey type I or II aortic dissection: open versus endovascular repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 48 (02) 258-263
- 3 Porto A, Omnes V, Bartoli MA. et al. Reintervention of residual aortic dissection after type A aortic repair: results of a prospective follow-up at 5 years. J Clin Med 2023; 12 (06) 2363
- 4 Antoniou GA, Schermerhorn ML, Forbes TL. et al. Risk factors, risk stratification and risk-specific surveillance strategies after endovascular aneurysm repair: study protocol for a Delphi study by the International RIsk Stratification in EVAR (IRIS-EVAR) working group. BMJ Open 2022; 12 (04) e055803
- 5 Guo J, Cai L, Jia L. et al. Wide mutation spectrum and frequent variant Ala27Thr of FBN1 identified in a large cohort of Chinese patients with sporadic TAAD. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 13115
- 6 Takeda N, Komuro I. Genetic basis of hereditary thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. J Cardiol 2019; 74 (02) 136-143
- 7 Milewicz DM, Guo D, Hostetler E, Marin I, Pinard AC, Cecchi AC. Update on the genetic risk for thoracic aortic aneurysms and acute aortic dissections: implications for clinical care. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2021; 62 (03) 203-210
- 8 World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013; 310 (20) 2191-2194
- 9 von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med 2007; 4 (10) e296
- 10 Kreibich M, Berger T, Rylski B. et al. Aortic reinterventions after the frozen elephant trunk procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 159 (02) 392-399.e1
- 11 Konertz J, Demal TJ, Bax L. et al. Preoperative Risk Factors for Reintervention after Aortic Repair for a Type A Aortic Dissection. In: 50th Annual Meeting of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (DGTHG). 2021
- 12 Roselli EE, Loor G, He J. et al. Distal aortic interventions after repair of ascending dissection: the argument for a more aggressive approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 149 (2, Suppl): S117-24.e3
- 13 Ghazy T, Eraqi M, Mahlmann A. et al. Quality of life after surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection: influences of different operative strategies. Heart Surg Forum 2017; 20 (03) E102-E106
- 14 Matalanis G, Perera NK, Galvin SD. Total aortic repair: the new paradigm in the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 5 (03) 216-221
- 15 Wang H, Wagner M, Benrashid E. et al. Outcomes of reoperation after acute type a aortic dissection: implications for index repair strategy. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6 (10) e006376
- 16 Rathore KS. Distal aortic remodeling after type A dissection repair: an ongoing mirage. J Chest Surg 2021; 54 (06) 439-448
- 17 Morisaki K, Matsubara Y, Kurose S. et al. Analysis of prognostic factors for postoperative complications and reinterventions after open surgical repair and endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg 2021; 77: 172-181
- 18 Theivacumar NS, Stephenson MA, Mistry H, Valenti D. Diabetics are less likely to develop thoracic aortic dissection: a 10-year single-center analysis. Ann Vasc Surg 2014; 28 (02) 427-432
- 19 Takagi H, Umemoto T. ALICE (All-Literature Investigation of Cardiovascular Evidence) Group. Negative association of diabetes with thoracic aortic dissection and aneurysm. Angiology 2017; 68 (03) 216-224
- 20 Elefteriades JA, Ziganshin BA, Zafar MA. Nonsize criteria for surgical intervention on the ascending thoracic aorta. Aorta (Stamford) 2023; 11 (02) 71-86
- 21 Ghazy TG, Ouda AS, Mashhour AM, Wilbring M, Matschke K, Kappert UW. Transapical aortic stenting: an initial case series. EuroIntervention 2016; 12 (10) 1305-1310
- 22 Harky A, Al-Adhami A. Stenting in type A aortic dissection: fantasy or reality?. J Vis Surg 2018;4
- 23 Tan G, Khoo P, Chan K. A review of endovascular treatment of thoracic aorta disease. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2018; 100 (08) 1-6
- 24 Cheng L, Xiang D, Zhang S, Zheng C, Wu X. Reintervention after thoracic endovascular aortic repair of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection. J Clin Med 2023; 12 (04) 1418
- 25 Ziemssen T, Siepmann T. The investigation of the cardiovascular and sudomotor autonomic nervous system - a review. Front Neurol 2019; 10: 53