A multicentre prospective comparison of magnet-controlled upper GI capsule endoscopy and oesophagogastroduodenoscopy in the detection of lesions with bleeding potential in patients with iron deficiency anaemia

Endoscopy 2025; 57(S 02): S649
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1806704

Abstracts | ESGE Days 2025

ePosters

Authors

P Oka

¹Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
D Tai

¹Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
M Shiha

²Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, United Kingdom, Leicester, United Kingdom
A Finta

³Endo – Kapszula Magánorvosi Centrum, Székesfehérvár, Hungary
L Madácsy

³Endo – Kapszula Magánorvosi Centrum, Székesfehérvár, Hungary
Y Yuanyuan

⁴Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
TL M Wong

⁵The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong, Hong Kong
JY W Lau

⁶CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
M McAlindon

¹Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom

References
1 Tai FWD. et al. Cost comparison of oral, transnasal and magnet assisted capsule endoscopy in the examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract of patients with dyspepsia. Frontline Gastroenterol 2022; 14: 300-305
2 Xiao Y-F. et al. Fully automated magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy for examination of the stomach and small bowel: a prospective, feasibility, two centre study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 6: P914-921
3 Tai FWD. et al. Comparison of patient tolerability and acceptability of magnet-controlled capsule endoscopy and flexible endoscopy in the investigation of dyspepsia. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10: E735-E744