RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1810443
Marginal Fit of Three Commonly Used Veneers for Smile Enhancement: An In Vitro Study

Abstract
Objectives
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the marginal fit of three most commonly used veneers in dentistry.
Materials and Methods
A maxillary central incisor was embedded in a self-cure acrylic resin block, with the crown and 2 mm of the root exposed to facilitate standardized tooth preparation. Following the preparation, 30 elastomeric impressions were made to produce master casts. These working dies were then randomly allocated to three experimental groups, each consisting of 15 samples. Group I comprised indirect composite veneers (ICV), fabricated using laboratory composite resin. Group II included pressable ceramic veneers (PCV), manufactured using heat-pressed lithium disilicate. Group III consisted of computer-aided designing (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) ceramic veneers, fabricated through digital milling of lithium disilicate blocks. All veneers were fabricated in accordance with the respective manufacturer's guidelines and were carefully repositioned on the prepared tooth to evaluate the marginal discrepancy using a stereomicroscope.
Statistical Analysis
Three pre-designated points—mesio-labial, mid-labial, and disto-labial and mesio-palatal, mid-palatal, and disto-palatal on the labial and palatal margins—were measured. The values were recorded and analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test using SPSS software.
Results
ICV showed more variation with mean discrepancy of 189.24 ± 25.17 µm at cervical margin and 79.01 ± 11.68 µm at palatal area. PCV showed less variation with mean discrepancy of 48.2 ± 8.35 µm and 40.58 ± 9.47 µm at cervical and palatal areas, respectively. CAD/CAM-fabricated ceramic veneers showed mean discrepancy of 94.24 ± 9.00 µm at cervical and 52.72 ± 16.33 µm at palatal areas.
Conclusions
Pressable ceramic veneers showed the best marginal fit at both cervical and palatal margins followed by CAD/CAM veneers. Indirect composite veneers showed poorest marginal fit. The marginal discrepancy values were within the clinically acceptable range for PCV and CAD/CAM ceramic veneers.
Clinical Significance
It is of paramount importance that the dentist should choose wisely the veneer material taking the marginal fit into account.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
05. August 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Gupta T, Sadana G, Rai HK. Effect of esthetic defects in anterior teeth on the emotional and social well-being of children: a survey. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019; 12 (03) 229-232
- 2 Mall V, Gaikwad A, Sachdev SS, Handa A, Chavan S, Kaul M. A minimally invasive approach for correction of anterior spacing and proclination with lithium disilicate glass-ceramic veneers: a case report. Cureus 2025; 17 (03) e80070
- 3 Guzman-Perez G, Jurado CA, Azpiazu-Flores F, Afrashtehfar KI, Tsujimoto A. Minimally invasive laminate veneer therapy for maxillary central incisors. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023; 59 (03) 603
- 4 Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent 2000; 28 (03) 163-177
- 5 Stappert CF, Stathopoulou N, Gerds T, Strub JR. Survival rate and fracture strength of maxillary incisors, restored with different kinds of full veneers. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32 (04) 266-272
- 6 Turkyilmaz I, Benli M, Yun S. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate and zirconia all-ceramic CAD-CAM crowns using digital impressions: a systematic review. Prim Dent J 2023; 12 (01) 88-95
- 7 Neppelenbroek KH. The clinical challenge of achieving marginal adaptation in direct and indirect restorations. J Appl Oral Sci 2015; 23 (05) 448-449
- 8 Kalantari MH, Abbasi B, Giti R, Rastegar Z, Tavanafar S, Shahsavari-Pour S. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of uncemented CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia three-unit restorations in anterior areas, using scannable and conventional polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. BMC Oral Health 2023; 23 (01) 52
- 9 McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971; 131 (03) 107-111
- 10 Boitelle P, Mawussi B, Tapie L, Fromentin O. A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations. J Oral Rehabil 2014; 41 (11) 853-874
- 11 Alwazzan KA, Almotairi AM, Alwazzan AK, Albesher FA, Tawhari FE, Alhumizi NA. Effect of fitting procedures on the marginal gap of all-ceramic crowns: an in vitro study. Saudi Dent J 2025; 37 (4-6): 9
- 12 Al-Dwairi ZN, Alkhatatbeh RM, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ. A comparison of the marginal and internal fit of porcelain laminate veneers fabricated by pressing and CAD-CAM milling and cemented with 2 different resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 2019; 121 (03) 470-476
- 13 Güth JF, Edelhoff D, Schweiger J, Keul C. A new method for the evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch digital impressions in vitro. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20 (07) 1487-1494
- 14 Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 2014; 93 (12) 1232-1234
- 15 Alothman Y, Bamasoud MS. The success of dental veneers according to preparation design and material type. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2018; 6 (12) 2402-2408
- 16 Cheng CW, Chien CH, Chen CJ, Papaspyridakos P. Complete-mouth implant rehabilitation with modified monolithic zirconia implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and an immediate-loading protocol: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 109 (06) 347-352
- 17 Zarone F, Di Mauro MI, Ausiello P, Ruggiero G, Sorrentino R. Current status on lithium disilicate and zirconia: a narrative review. BMC Oral Health 2019; 19 (01) 134
- 18 Sharma R, Sharma AR, Madathil E, Tayal R. Recent trends in dental ceramics: a comprehensive review. J Academy Dent Educ. 2025; 11: 61-67
- 19 Valderhaug J, Heloe LA. Oral hygiene in a group of supervised patients with fixed prostheses. J Periodontol 1977; 48 (04) 221-224
- 20 Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62 (04) 405-408
- 21 Rosensteil SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Tooth preparation for all-ceramic restorations. In: Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 4th ed.. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier; 2006: 329-331
- 22 Tsouknidas A, Karaoglani E, Michailidis N, Kugiumtzis D, Pissiotis A, Michalakis K. Influence of preparation depth and design on stress distribution in maxillary central incisors restored with ceramic veneers: a 3D finite element analysis. J Prosthodont 2020; 29 (02) 151-160
- 23 Luna-Domínguez CR, Luna-Domínguez JH, Blatz M. Full-mouth rehabilitation in a completely digital workflow using partially adhesive monolithic zirconia restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2023; 35 (07) 1050-1057
- 24 Naert I, Van der Donck A, Beckers L. Precision of fit and clinical evaluation of all-ceramic full restorations followed between 0.5 and 5 years. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32 (01) 51-57
- 25 Jia S, Chen D, Wang D, Bao X, Tian X. Comparing marginal microleakage of three different dental materials in veneer restoration using a stereomicroscope: an in vitro study. BDJ Open 2017; 3 (01) 16010
- 26 Guachetá L, Stevens CD, Tamayo Cardona JA, Murgueitio R. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate veneers fabricated via a manual waxing technique versus a 3D printed technique. J Esthet Restor Dent 2022; 34 (04) 715-720
- 27 Baig MR, Tan KB, Nicholls JI. Evaluation of the marginal fit of a zirconia ceramic computer-aided machined (CAM) crown system. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104 (04) 216-227
- 28 Hannig M, Jepsen S, Jasper V, Lorenz-Stucke C. Der Randschluss glaskeramischer Veneers mit zervikaler Schmelz-oder Dentinebegrenzung. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1995; 50: 227-229
- 29 Duke ES. The introduction of a new class of composite resins ceromers. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999; 20 (03) 246-247
- 30 Aboushelib MN, Elmahy WA, Ghazy MH. Internal adaptation, marginal accuracy and microleakage of a pressable versus a machinable ceramic laminate veneers. J Dent 2012; 40 (08) 670-677
- 31 Vojdani M, Torabi K, Farjood E, Khaledi A. Comparison the marginal and internal fit of metal copings cast from wax patterns fabricated by CAD/CAM and conventional wax up techniques. J Dent (Shiraz) 2013; 14 (03) 118-129
- 32 Richter WA, Ueno H. Relationship of crown margin placement to gingival inflammation. J Prosthet Dent 1973; 30 (02) 156-161
- 33 Şentürk A, Akat B, Ocak M, Kılıçarslan MA, Orhan K. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM ceramic inlay restorations fabricated through model scanner, intraoral scanner, and CBCT scans. Appl Sci (Basel) 2025; 15 (09) 4626
- 34 Reich S, Kappe K, Teschner H, Schmitt J. Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses. Eur J Oral Sci 2008; 116 (06) 579-584
- 35 Yüksel E, Zaimoğlu A. Influence of marginal fit and cement types on microleakage of all-ceramic crown systems. Braz Oral Res 2011; 25 (03) 261-266
- 36 Harasani MH, Isidor F, Kaaber S. Marginal fit of porcelain and indirect composite laminate veneers under in vitro conditions. Scand J Dent Res 1991; 99 (03) 262-268
- 37 Lofstrom LH, Barakat MM. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of clinically cemented cast gold restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61 (06) 664-669