The present postmarketing surveillance (PMS) study is the first large scale systematic
and prospective clinical trial of pharmacotherapeutic intervention in advanced stages
of dementia. Within a validation program this study aimed at demonstrating the sensitivity
of the D-Scale of change (DS-C) for measuring ADL-function. Efficacy of treatment
with the NMDA-antagonist memantine[1] was investigated in 531 patients with advanced dementia employing a parallel group
design that stratified patient cohorts by severity according to GDS stages (Reisberg,
1992). Efficacy was determined on two independent levels: by the assessment of the
physicians' Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at the end of a 6-week observation
period, and by the assessment of change in elementary ADL-functions by the caregivers
using the D-Scale-of-Change. With the D-Scale-of-Change the caregivers can assess
a change in broad functional items, i.e. cognitive and motor functions and also elementary
functions of daily life. The effect size of this improvement increased constantly
during the observation period. Even in patients of GDS stage 7 an improvement could
be measured. These results were also seen by the physicians, who recorded an overall
clinical improvement in 75.5 % of the patients after 6 weeks. Tolerability evaluations
resulted in the ratings “very well” by 59.5 % or “well” by 35.0 % of the patients.
No serious adverse drug reactions occurred. A correlation analysis demonstrated a
high congruency of both assessments. Furthermore, the observed time course of these
improvements paralleled with the time course of symptomatic benefit by effects of
memantine that had been repeatedly demonstrated in randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled
studies in mild to moderate dementia. Together with the evaluation of the scale-properties
of the D-Scale for assessment of severity the D-Scale and the D-Scale-of-Change can
be regarded as validated.
References
- 1 Arnold K, Lehfeld H, Mösler Th, Erzigkeit H. Scale properties of the D-Scale in
severe dementia.
6th Int. Conf. Alzheimer's Disease. Amsterdam; 1998
- 2 Bergener M, Reisberg B. (Eds.) .Diagnosis and treatment of senile dementia. Springer
Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 1989
- 3 . (ed) .Internationale Skalen für Psychiatrie (4. Auflage). Beltz Test Göttingen;
1996
- 4 . Note for Guidance on medicinal products in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. CPMP//EWP/533/95
London; 1997
- 5
Ditzler K.
Efficacy and tolerability of memantine in patients with dementia syndrome.
Drug Res.
1991;
41
773-780
- 6
Fern L.
Behavioral Activities in demented geriatric patients.
Geront. Clin..
1974;
16
185-194
- 7
Galasko D, Bennett M, Sano M. et al .
An inventory to assess activities of daily living for clinical trials in Alzheimer's
disease.
Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disorders.
1997;
11,Suppl. 2
33-39
- 8
Görtelmeyer R, Erbler H.
Memantine in the treatment of mild to moderate dementia syndrome.
Drug Res..
1992;
42
904-913
- 9
Gottfries C G, Brain G, Steen G.
A new rating scale for dementia syndromes.
Gerontology.
1982;
28, Suppl. 2
20-31
- 10
Greenamyre J T, Young A B.
Excitatory amino acids and Alzheimer's disease.
Neurobiol. Aging.
1989;
10
593-602
- 11 Guy W. Early clinical drug evaluation (ECDEU).
Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. 1976
- 12 Kam P, Mol F, Wimmers M FMG. Beurteilungsskalen für geriatrische Patienten (BGP)
(CIPS) Internationale Skalen für Psychiatrie, 4. Auflage. Beltz Test Göttingen; 1996
- 13
Meer B, Baker J A.
The Stockton geriatric rating scale.
J. Gerontol..
1966;
21
392-403
- 14
Misztal M, Frankiewicz T, Parsons C G, Danysz W.
Learning deficits induced by chronic intraventricular infusion of quinolinic acid
- protection by MK-801 and memantine.
European Journal of Pharmacology.
1996;
296
1-8
- 15
Pantev M, Ritter R, Görtelmeyer R.
Clinical and behavioural evaluation in long-term care patients with mild to moderate
dementia under memantine treatment.
Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie und -psychiatrie.
1993;
6
103-117
- 16
Parsons C G, Danysz W, Quack G.
Memantine is a clinically well tolerated NMDA Receptor Antagonist - a review of preclinical
data.
Neuropharmacology.
1999;
38
735-767
- 17
Reisberg B, Ferris S H, de Leon M Y, Crook T.
The global deterioration scale (GDS): an instrument for the assessment of primary
degenerative dementia (PDD).
Am. J. Psychiat..
1992;
139
1136-1139
- 18 Rüther E, Glaser A. The NMDA-antagonist memantine in severe dementia: Results of
a prospective post-marketing surveillance study. 6th Int. Conf. Alzheimer's Disease
Amsterdam; 1998
- 19
Seif el Nasr M, Peruche B, Roßberg C, Mennel H D, Krieglstein J.
Neuroprotective effect of memantine demonstrated in vivo and in vitro.
Eur. J. Pharmacol..
1990;
185
19-24
- 20
Wimo A, Ljunggren G, Winblad B.
Costs of dementia care: a review.
Int. J. Geriat. Psychiatry.
1997;
12
841-856
- 21 Winblad B, Poritis N. Memantine in severe dementia. Int. J. Geriat. Psychiatry
1999 14 : 135-146
- 22
Zajaczkowski W, Frankiewicz T, Parsons C G, Danysz W.
Uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists attenuate NMDA-induced impairment of passive
avoidance learning and LTP.
Neuropharmacology.
1997;
36
961-971
1 Memantine = 1-amino-3,5 dimethyladamantane
Prof. Dr. med. Eckart Rüther
Psychiatrische Klinik Georg-August-Universität
von-Siebold-Straße 5 D-37075 Göttingen Germany