Abstract
Objective: Valve-preserving root replacement has become an accepted alternative to composite
replacement both in dissection and in aneurysmal disease. We retrospectively analysed
5-year results comparing root remodelling and reimplantation procedures. Methods:
From October 1995 to January 2001, 119 patients underwent either root remodelling
(group A; n = 98; age: 61 ± 14 years) or valve reimplantation within a vascular graft
(group B; n = 21; age: 47 ± 17 years). In group A, 26 patients were operated for aortic
dissection type A and 72 for aortic valve regurgitation and aneurysmal disease. In
group B, 8 patients were operated for aortic dissection type A, 13 for aortic valve
regurgitation and aneurysm. Concomitant arch surgery was performed in 65 patients
(group A: 57; group B: 8). Results: Time on cardiopulmonary bypass was 121 ± 30 min
in group A, 143 ± 24 min in group B, and aortic cross-clamp time was 87 ± 19 min in
group A and 113 ± 24 minin group B. Average duration was therefore longer in group
B (p = n.s.) Hospital mortality was 3.1 % in group A and 0 % in group B. Following
elective procedures, hospital mortality was 1.1 % in group A. Freedom from aortic
regurgitation over grade 2 at 4 years was 86 % in group A and 94.7 % in group B. At
4 years, freedom from proximal reoperation was 97.8 % in group A and 100 % in group
B. There was no deterioration of valve function or need for reoperation observed after
1 year in either group. Conclusion: Five-year results are comparable and encouraging for remodelling and reimplantation
procedures. If the initial valve function and geometry is adequate, the chance of
secondary failure beyond the first year is minimal.
Key words
Aneurysmal disease - Aortic regurgitation - Valve preservation and replacement
References
- 1
Bachet J, Termingnon J L, Goutot B, Dreyfus G, Piquois A, Brodaty D, Dubois C, Delentdecker P,
Guilmet D.
Aortic root replacement with a composite graft. Factors influencing immediate and
long-term results.
Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg..
1996;
10
((3))
207-213
- 2
Gott V L, Gillinov A M, Pyeritz R E, Cameron D E, Reitz B A, Greene P S, Stone C D,
Ferris R L, Alejo D E, McKusick V A.
Aortic root replacement. Risk factor analysis of a seventeen-year experience with
270 patients.
J Thorac Cardiovsc Surg.
1995;
109
536-544
- 3
David T E, Feindel C F.
An aortic valve sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm
of the ascending aorta.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
1992;
103
617-622
- 4
Sarsam M A, Yacoub M.
Remodeling of the aortic valve annulus.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
1993;
105
435-438
- 5
Graeter T, Kindermann M, Fries R, Langer F, Schäfers H J.
Comparison of aortic valve gradient during exercise after aortic valve reconstruction.
Chest.
2000;
118
1271-1277
- 6
David T E, Armstrong S, Ivanov J, Webb G D.
Aortic valve sparing operations: an update.
Ann Thorac Surg.
1999;
67
1840-1842
- 7
Horstkotte D, Schulte H, Bircks W, Strauer B.
Unexpected findings concerning thromboembolic complications and anticoagulation after
complete 10 year follow-up of patients with St. Jude medical prostheses.
J Heart Valve Dis.
1993;
2
291-301
- 8
David T E.
Remodeling the aortic root and preservation of the native aortic valve Operative techniques
in cardiac and thoracic surgery.
J Thorac Cardisvasc Surg.
1996;
1
44-56
- 9
Schäfers H J, Fries R, Langer F, Nikoloudakis N, Graeter T, Grundmann U.
Valve preserving replacement of the ascending aorta - remodeling vs. reimplantation.
J Thorac Cardisvasc Surg.
1998;
116
990-996
- 10
Birks E J, Webb C, Child A, Radley-Smith R, Yacoub M H.
Early and long-term results of a valve sparing operation for Marfan syndrome.
Circulation.
1999;
100
29-35
- 11
Daily P O, Trueblood H W, Stinson E B, Wuerflein R D, Shumway N E.
Management of acute aortic dissections.
Ann Thorac Surg.
1970;
10
237
- 12
Guilmet D, Bachet J, Goudot B, Laurian C, Gigou F, Bical O, Barbagelatta M.
Use of biological glue in acute aortic dissection.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
1979;
77
516-521
- 13
Westaby S, Katsumata T, Freitas E.
Aortic valve conservation in acute type A dissection.
Ann Thorac Surg.
1997;
64
108-1112
- 14
Mazzucotelli J P, Deleuze P H, Baufreton C, Duval A M, Million M L, Loisance D Y,
Cachera J P.
Preservation of the aortic valve in acute aortic dissection: long-term echocardiographic
assessment and clinical outcome.
Ann Thorac Surg.
1993;
55
((6))
1513-1517
- 15
Miller D C, Stinson E B, Oyer P E, Rossiter S J, Reitz B A, Griepp R B, Shumway N E.
Operative treatment of aortic dissection: Experience with 125 patients over a sixteen-year
period.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
1979;
78
365-383
- 16
Otto C.
Aortic valve insufficiency: changing concepts in diagnosis and management.
Cardiologia.
1996;
41
505-513
- 17
Larson E W, Edwards W D.
Risk factors for aortic dissection: a necropsy study of 161 cases.
Am J Cardiol.
1984;
53
849-855
- 18
Edwards W D, Leaf D S, Edwards J E.
Dissecting aortic aneurysm associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve.
Circulation.
1978;
57
1022-10225
- 19
Hahn R T, Roman M J, Mogtader A H, Devereux R B.
Association of aortic dilation with regurgitant, stenotic and functionally normal
bicuspid aortic valves.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
1992;
19
283-288
- 20
Fenoglio J, McAllister H, DeCastro C D. et al .
Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valve after the Age of 20.
Am J Cardiol.
1977;
39
164-169
- 21
Wilkenshoff U M, Kruck I, Cast D, Schröder R.
Validity of continuous wave Doppler and colour Doppler in the assessment of aortic
regurgitation.
Eur Heart J.
1994;
15
1227-1234
- 22
Nishimura R A, Vonk G D, Rumberger J A, Tagik A J.
Semiquantification of aortic regurgitation by different Doppler echocardiographic
techniques and comparison with ultrafast computed tomography.
Am Heart J.
1992;
124
995-1001
Dr. med. Thomas Graeter
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
University Hospitals
66421 Homburg (Saar)
Germany
Telefon: +49 (6841) 162-501
Fax: +49 (6841) 162-788
eMail: chhtgra@med-rz.uni-sb.de