Facial Plast Surg 2002; 18(3): 197-204
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-33066
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Phoniatric Aspects in Cleft Lip Patients

Frank Rosanowski, Ulrich Eysholdt
  • Department of Phoniatrics and Pedaudiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 July 2002 (online)

ABSTRACT

Multidisciplinary care for patients with clefts includes surgical correction of the facial disfigurement and optimizing the quality of speech to improve the social integration of the affected patient. This work summarizes the knowledge of communicational aspects of cleft lip (CL) patients. Cleft-type speech characteristics can be described as ``passive'' obligatory errors resulting from the anatomical defect and ``active'' compensation efforts. Long-lasting phonological deficits in patients with clefts may be due to the fact that their development is affected by abnormal learned neuromotor patterns as a consequence of these two mechanisms. Surgery alone will not modify active cleft-type characteristics whereas speech therapy should lead to an improvement. Passive characteristics are usually assessed by speech therapy but surgery may facilitate the progress. From the phoniatrician's point of view, rhinophonia in (secondary lip and septo-) rhinoplasty (and surgery of the nasal sinuses) in CL patients has to be assessed in no other way than in patients without a cleft. Pragmatic skills, that is, using verbal speech in a social context, cognition, and the acquisition of emotional, behavioral, and social interaction patterns may be affected in patients with isolated CLs. As a consequence these individuals are at high risk to develop emotional disorders. So speech developmental disorders in a narrow sense are of minor importance in individuals with an isolated CL when comparing them with patients with CL and palate. Communication disorders in these patients seem not to result from phonological defects but from psychological problems that may influence the entire development of an affected child. The literature shows that there is a need to collect more data on the issue of psychological and social problems in patients with an isolated CL for clinical and scientific purposes.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Gregg T, Boyd D, Richardson A. The incidence of cleft lip and palate in Northern Ireland from 1980-1990.  Brit J Orthodont . 1994;  21 387-392
  • 2 Richman L C. Parents and teachers: differing views of behaviour of cleft palate children.  Cleft Palate J . 1978;  15 360-364
  • 3 Turner S R, Thomas P WN, Dowell T, Rumsey N, Sandy J R. Psychological outcomes amongst cleft patients and their families.  Brit J Plastic Surgery . 1997;  50 1-9
  • 4 Harding A, Grunwell P. Active versus passive cleft-type speech characteristics.  Int J Lang Commun Disord . 1998;  33 329-352
  • 5 Harding A, Grunwell P. Characteristics of cleft palate speech.  Eur J Disord Commun . 1996;  31 331-358
  • 6 Ysunza A, Pamplona C, Mendoza M. Speech outcome and maxillary growth in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip/palate operated on at 6 versus 12 months of age.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1998;  10 675-679
  • 7 Gosain A, Conley S, Santoro T, Denny A D. A prospective evaluation of the prevalence of submucous cleft palate in patients with isolated cleft lip versus controls.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1999;  103 1857-1863
  • 8 Schönweiler R, Lisson J A, Schönweiler B. A retrospective study of hearing, speech and language function in children with clefts following palatoplasty and veloplasty procedures at 18-24 months of age.  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol . 1999;  50 205-217
  • 9 Van Denmark R D, Morris H L, Van De Haar C. Patterns of articulation abilities in speakers with cleft palate.  Cleft Palate J . 1979;  6 230-239
  • 10 Nation J. Determinants of vocabulary development of preschool cleft palate children.  Cleft Palate J . 1970;  7 645-651
  • 11 Smith R M, McWilliams B J. Psycholinguistic considerations of the management of children with cleft palate.  J Speech Hear Disord . 1968;  33 26-33
  • 12 Spriesterbach D C, Darley F L, Morris H L. Language skills in children with cleft palate.  J Speech Hear Res . 1958;  1 279-285
  • 13 Brinton B, Fujiki M. Conversational intervention with children with specific language impairment. In: Fey ME, Windsor J, Warren SF, eds. Language Intervention: Preschool Through the Elementary Years Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes 1995: 183-213
  • 14 Chapman K L, Graham K T, Gooch J, Visconti C. Conversational skills of preschool and school-age children with cleft lip and palate.  Cleft Palate Craniofac J . 1998;  35 503-516
  • 15 Black B, Hazen N L. Social status and patterns of communication in acquainted and unacquainted preschool children.  Dev Psychol . 1990;  26 379-387
  • 16 Goodstein L. Intellectual impairment in children with cleft palates.  J Speech Hear Res . 1961;  4 287-294
  • 17 Richman L. The effects of facial disfigurement on teacher's perception of ability in cleft palate children.  Cleft Palate J . 1978;  15 155-160
  • 18 Schneiderman C, Harding J. Social ratings of children with cleft lip by school peers.  Cleft Palate J . 1984;  21 219-223
  • 19 Lahti A, Rintela A, Soivio A. Educational level of patients with cleft lip and palate.  Cleft Palate J . 1974;  11 36-40
  • 20 Richman L, Eliason M. Type of reading disability related to cleft type and neuropsychological patterns.  Cleft Palate J . 1984;  21 1-6
  • 21 Kommers M S, Sullivan M D. Written language skills of children with cleft palate.  Cleft Palate J . 1979;  16 81-85
  • 22 Fox D, Lynch J, Brookshire B. Selected developmental factors of cleft palate children between 2 and 33 months of age.  Cleft Palate J . 1978;  15 239-245
  • 23 Pannbacker M. Prevention of communication problems associated with cleft palate.  J Comm Disord . 1988;  21 401-408
  • 24 Lynch J. Language of cleft infants: lessening the risk of delay through programming.  Semin Speech Lang . 1986;  7 255-268
  • 25 Bzoch K, Kemker J, Wood V. The prevention of communicative disorders in cleft palate infants. In: Lass N, ed. Speech and Language Advances in Basic Research and Practice New York, NY: Academic Pr Inc 1984: 59-110
  • 26 Jocelyn L J, Penko M A, Rode H L. Cognition, communication, and hearing in young children with cleft lip and palate and in control children: a longitudinal study.  Pediatrics . 1996;  97 529-534
  • 27 Broder H L, Strauss R P. Self-concept of early primary school age children with visible or invisible defects.  Cleft Palate J . 1989;  26 114-118
  • 28 Bradbury E. Psychological approaches to children and adolescents with disfigurement: a review of the literature.  Assoc Child Psychol Psychiatry Rev Newsletter . 1993;  15 1-6
  • 29 Turner S R, Rumsey N, Sandy J R. Psychological aspects of cleft lip and palate.  Eur J Orthodont . 1998;  20 407-415
  • 30 Shaw W C. Applied psychological research in the clinical management of dental and facial deformity.  Hum Learning . 1986;  5 209-210
  • 31 Lansdown R, Lloyd J, Hunter J. Facial deformity in childhood: severity and psychological adjustment.  Child Care Health Dev . 1991;  17 165-171
  • 32 Kapp-Simon K A. Psychological interventions for the adolescent with cleft lip and palate.  Cleft Palate Craniofacial J . 1995;  32 104-108
  • 33 Canady J W. Emotional effects of plastic surgery on the adolescent with a cleft.  Cleft Palate Craniofac J . 1995;  32 120-124
  • 34 Noar J H. Questionnaire survey of attitudes and concerns of patients with cleft lip and palate and their parents.  Cleft Palate J . 1991;  28 279-284
  • 35 Homas P T, Turner S R, Rumsey N, Dowell T, Sandy J R. Satisfaction with facial appearance among subjects affected by a cleft.  Cleft Palate Craniofac J . 1997;  34 226-231
    >