Semin Neurol 2002; 22(4): 391-398
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-36761
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

History of the Extensor Plantar Response: Babinski and Chaddock Signs

Christopher G. Goetz
  • Professor of Neurological Sciences, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 January 2003 (online)

ABSTRACT

The testing of reflexes involving the lower extremities is a pivotal part of the modern neurological examination. The normal response to noxious stimulation of the foot is plantar flexion of the toes, causing them to curl downward toward the undersurface of the foot. In 1896, Joseph Babinski described an extensor toe response that he claimed was a consistent finding among patients with pyramidal tract lesions of the cortex, subcortex, brain stem, or spinal cord. He considered it a distinct sign of organic disease and found it to be absent in cases of hysterical weakness. Charles Gilbert Chaddock admired the work of Babinski and described a modification of the Babinski technique, demonstrating that stimulation of the lateral surface of the foot could induce the same type of toe extension in patients with pyramidal tract lesions. The two reflexes are complementary, and each can occur without the other, although both are usually present in cases of pyramidal tract impairment. Although these two reflexes are the most commonly described pathological reflexes indicative of pyramidal tract disruption, the names of other celebrated neurologists are also linked to the study of extensor toe signs, each having identified a variant of the Babinski sign.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Haerer A F. DeJong's The Neurological Examination.  Philadelphia: JB Lippincott 1992
  • 2 Babinski J. Sur le réflexe cutané plantaire dans certaines affections organiques du système nerveux central.  C R Soc Biol . 1896;  48 207-208
  • 3 Babinski J. Relachement des muscles dans l'hémiplégie organique.  C R Soc Biol . 1896;  48 471-472
  • 4 Babinski J. Du phénomène des orteils et de sa valeur sémiologique.  Sem Méd . 1898;  18 321-322
  • 5 Babinski J. Diagnostic différentiel de l'hémiplégie organique et de l'hémiplégie hystérique.  Gaz Hôp . 1900;  53 533-538
  • 6 Chaddock C G. A preliminary consideration concerning a new diagnostic nervous sign.  Interstate Med J . 1911;  12 742-746
  • 7 Chaddock C G. The external malleolar sign.  Interstate Med J . 1911;  13 1026-1038
  • 8 Oppenheim H. Aur Pathologie der Hautreflexe an der unteren Extremitaten.  Monatsschr Psychiatri Neurol . 1902;  12 421-423
  • 9 Gordon A. A new reflex: paradoxic flexor reflex and its diagnostic value.  Am Med . 1904;  8 971
  • 10 Strümpell A V. Ueber das Verhalten der Haut- und Sehnenreflexe bel Nervenkranken.  Neur Cbl . 1899;  18 617-619
  • 11 Moniz E. Le signe de la flexion plantaire du gros orteil avec la jambe en flexion.  Revue Neurologique . 1916;  30 173-176
  • 12 Gonda V E. A new tendon stretch reflex: its significance in lesions of the pyramidal tract.  Arch Neurol Psychiatry . 1942;  26 531-538
  • 13 Allen I M. Application of a stretch reflex for identification of lesions of upper motor neurons.  NZ Med J . 1945;  44 227-233
  • 14 Goetz C G, Bonduelle M, Gelfand T. Jean-Martin Charcot: Constructing Neurology.  New York: Oxford University Press 1995
  • 15 Goetz C G. Charcot the Clinician.  New York: Raven Press 1987
  • 16 Hammerstad J P. Strength and reflexes. In: Goetz CG, Pappert EJ, eds. Textbook of Clinical Neurology Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1999: 225-267
  • 17 Putnam J J. Personal letter to his family, 1872. Countway Medical Library, Boston
  • 18 Babinski J. De l'abduction des orteils (signe de l'éventail).  Rev Neurol (Paris) . 1903;  11 728-729
  • 19 Goetz C G. The Salpêtrière in the wake of Charcot's death.  Arch Neurol . 1988;  45 444-447
  • 20 Delhoume L. De Claude Bernard à d'Arsonval.  Paris: Baillière 1939
  • 21 Kwieciski H. On the legacy of Joseph Babinski.  Europ Neurol . 1995;  35 127-130
  • 22 Porchska G. Adnotationum academicarum fasciculi tres: de functionibus systematis nervoisi et observationes anatomicopathologicae.  Prague: [no publisher] 1784
  • 23 Hall M. On the reflex function of the medulla oblongata and medulla spinalis.  Philos Trans R Soc London . 1833;  123 635-665
  • 24 Brigham A. An Inquiry Concerning the Diseases and Functions of the Brain, Spinal Cord, and the Nerves.  New York: George Adlard Publisher 1840
  • 25 Massey E W, Sanders L. Babinski's sign in medieval, renaissance and baroque art.  Arch Neurol . 1989;  46 85-88
  • 26 Wernicke C. Lehrbuch der Gehimkrankeiten.  Kassel: Fischer 1881
  • 27 Strümpell A V. Beitäge zur Pathologie des Rhckenmarks.  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr . 1881;  11 27-74
  • 28 Remak E. Zur localisation der spinalen Hautreflexe der unterextremitaten.  Neurol Centrabl . 1893;  12 506-512
  • 29 Van Gijn J. The Babinski sign and the pyramidal syndrome.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr . 1975;  38 180-186
  • 30 Collier J. An investigation upon the plantar reflex with reference to the significance of its variations under pathological conditions, including an enquiry into the aetiology of acquired pes cavus.  Brain . 1899;  22 71-99
  • 31 Chaddock C G. Translation of J Babinski: tendon reflexes and bone reflexes: an authorized translation.  Interstate Med J . 1914;  21 75-1054
  • 32 Chaddock C G. A new reflex phenomenon in the hand: the wrist-sign.  Interstate Med J . 1912;  19 127-131
  • 33 O'Leary J L, Moore W L. Charles Gilbert Chaddock: his life and contributions.  J Hist Med Allied Sci . 1953;  8 301-317
  • 34 Yoshimura K. On Babinski's phenomenon [in Japanese].  Igaku Chuo Zasshi . 1906;  4 533-955
  • 35 Tashiro K. Reversed Chaddock method: a new method to elicit the upgoing great toe.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr . 1986;  49 1321-1322
    >