Abstract
Background: There are evident risks factors stemming from any the local post-surgical infection,
which merits analysis of morbidity derived from conservative and radical surgery after
treatment of the operable breast cancer.
Study Design: 107 patients with breast cancer recruited between November 1995 and October 1997
were evaluated. From that total, 36 patients were subjected to quadrantectomy, axillary
lymphadenectomy and postoperative radiation while 71 patients were subjected to modified
radical mastectomy.
Results: 7 % percent of patients who underwent modified radical surgery succumbed to postoperative
local infection vs. 17 % of patients subjected to breast conserving therapies. Local
infections were associated with the older patients (63 vs. 54 years old, p=0.03) and
greater obesity (p=0.04). Upon logistic regression analysis conservative surgery exhibited
adjusted Odds Ratio of 6.42 (1.27-32.28), p =0.02. In postoperative infection group
average hospital stay increased by 6 days (p= 0.0001).
Conclusion: In the present study main risk factors associated with postsurgical wound infection
after breast cancer treatment proved to be advanced age, greater obesity and conservative
surgery. Nonetheless, more studies are necessary to confirm current findings.
Key words
Wound infection - breast surgery - breast cancer - obesity, and risks factors of infection
References
1
Veronesi U, Saccozzi M, Del Vecchio M.
Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy
in patients with small cancers of the breast.
N Engl J Med.
1981;
305
6-11
2
Sarrazin D, Dewae J A, Arriagada R.
Conservative management of breast cancer.
Br J Surg.
1986;
73
604-606
3
Fischer B, Redmond C, Poisson R, Margolese R, Womark N, Wickkershman L.
Eight year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing mastectomy and lumpectomy
with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.
N Engl J Med.
1989;
320
822-828
4
Veronesi U, Salvadori B, Luini A.
Conservative treatment of early breast cancer: long-term results of 1 232 cases treated
with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy.
Ann Surg.
1990;
211
250-259
5
Maskarinec G, Dhakal S, Yamashiro G, Issell B.
The use of breast conserving surgery: linking insurance Claim with tumor registry
data.
BMC Cancer.
2002;
2
3
6
Vinton A L, Traverso L W, Jolly P C.
Wound complications alter modified radical mastectomy compared to tylectomy with axillary
lymph node dissection.
Am J Surg.
1991;
161
584-588
7
DeFeiter P W, Stockmann H B, Wereldsma J C, VanPutten W L, VanAssendelft P J.
Wound infections alter mastectomy for breast cancer.
The Breast.
1997;
6
6-11
8
Rotstein C, Ferguson R, Cummings K M, Piedmonte M R, Lucey J, Banish A.
Determinants of clean surgical wound infections for breast procedures at an oncology
Center.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.
1992;
13
207-214
9
Siegel B M, Mayzel K A, Love S M.
Level I and II axillary dissection in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer,
an analysis of 259 consecutive patients.
Arch Surg.
1990;
125
1144-1147
10
Wedgwood K R, Benson E A.
Non-tumor morbidity and mortality after modified radical mastectomy, Ann.
R Coll Surg Engl.
1992;
74
314-317
11
Funnell I C, Crowe P J, Dent D M.
a Does surgical experience influence mastectomy complications?.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl.
1992;
74
178-180
12
Platt R, Zucker J R, Zaleznik D F.
Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and wound infection following breast surgery.
J Antimicrobiol Chemoth.
1992;
31
43-48
13
Lefebvre D, Penel N, Deberles M F, Fournier C.
Incidence and surgical infection risk factors in breast cancer surgery.
Press Med.
2000;
29
1937-1932
14
Strozzo M D.
An overview of surgical management of stage I and stage II breast cancer ihr the primary
rare provider.
Lipincotts Prior Gare Pract.
1998;
2
160-169
15
Lipshy K A, Neifield J P, Boyle R M, Frable W J, Ronan S, Lotfi P, Bea HD, Horsley
JS 3 rd, Lawrence W Jr.
Complications of mastectomy and their relationship to biopsy technique.
Ann Surg Oncol.
1996;
3
290-294
16
Bardon D W.
Principles of antimicrobial prophylaxis.
World J Surg.
1982;
6
262-267
17
Cruse P JE, Foord R N.
The epidemiology of wound infection: a 10-year prospective study of 62 939 wounds.
Sarg Clin North Am.
1980;
60
27-40
18
Barber G R, Miransky J, Brown A E, Coit D G, Lewis F M, Thaler H T, Kiehn T E, Armstrong D.
Direct observations of surgical wound infections at a comprehensive cancer center.
Arch Surg.
1995;
130
1042-1047
19
Brote L.
Wound infections in clean and potentially contaminated surgery: importance of bacterial
and non- bacterial factors.
Acta Chic Scand.
1976;
142
91-200
20
Tejler G, Aspegren K.
Complications and hospital stay after surgery for breast cancer: a prospective study
of 38-5 patients.
Br J Sarg.
1985;
72
542-544
Dr. Anibal Nieto Díaz
C/Toledo No. 2
28804 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid
Fax: (34) 9 18 82 81 01
Email: Anibalnieto@terra.es