PDF herunterladen
Int J Sports Med 2005; 26(4): 294-302
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-820962
Orthopedics & Biomechanics

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Validation of a New Method that Measures Contact and Flight Times During Vertical Jump

J. García-López1 , J. Peleteiro1 , J. A. Rodgríguez-Marroyo1 , J. C. Morante1 , J. A. Herrero1 , J. G. Villa1
  • 1Institute of Physical Education, University of León, Spain
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Accepted after revision: March 1, 2004

Publikationsdatum:
26. Juli 2004 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

The aim of this study was to design and validate a vertical jump assessing system based on flight time measurements. Hence, the first phase of this study consisted of programming the software SportJumpv-1.0 and adapting a contact mat and a computer mouse in order to record the flight and contact times of a jump test. In the second phase, 9 subjects made 12 maximal and submaximal vertical single and rebound jumps. Thus 108 flight times and 36 contact times were simultaneously obtained with five different systems: ErgoJump Bosco System (PS), SportJump-v1.0 (SJ), Force Plate (FP), High-speed camera (HSC), and a Led (LED) filmed with a high-speed camera; FP was considered as the reference system. No significant differences were found either between SJ and LED, or between FP and HSC systems. SJ and LED overestimate flight time (9 ms and p < 0.001) and underestimate contact time in respect to FP values. PS underestimates flight time regarding FP values (4 ms and p < 0.01). In spite of the differences obtained between the systems, the errors found are constant. Those slightly depend on the subject's body mass for the systems that are connected to a contact mat. A high correlation between all of them was obtained (r ∼ 1 and p < 0.001). The SJ system was validated for an accuracy of 500 Hz, and it was shown to be a useful tool in measuring flight and contact times during jumping. The differences and correlations found between the five systems show that it is necessary to take into account which system is being used when analyzing vertical jump performance.

Key words

Biomechanics - vertical jump - contact mat - instruments

References

  • 1 Alixanov I I, Alixanova L I. Compteur chronomètre utilise lors des expériences et des recherches en sport.  Teor Prakt Fiz Kult. 1987;  7 48-51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Baca A A. Comparisons of methods for analyzing drop jump performance.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;  31 437-442
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Beckenholdt S E, Mayhew J L. Specify among anaerobic power test in male athletes.  J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1983;  23 326-332
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bobbert M F, Gerritsen K J, Litjens M C, Van-Soest A J. Why is countermovement jump height greater than squat jump height?.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996;  28 1402-1412
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Bogdanis G, Nevill M E, Boobis L H, Lakomy H K. Contribution of phosphocreatine and aerobic metabolism to energy supply during repeated sprint exercise.  J Appl Physiol. 1996;  80 876-884
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bosco C, Luhtanen P, Komi P V. A simple method for measurement of mechanical power in jumping.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1983;  50 273-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Dal Monte A. The Functional Evaluation of the Athlete. Firenze; Sansoni 1983: 138
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Dowling J, Vamos L. Identification of kinetic and temporal factors related to vertical jump performance.  J Appl Biomech. 1993;  9 95-110
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Durá J V, Lozano L, Hoyos J V. Analysis of the biomechanical and sports suitability of a variety of floor surfaces.  Investigación en Ciencias del Deporte. 1998;  19 89-116
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Enoka R M, Stuart D G. Neurobiology of muscle fatigue.  J Appl Physiol. 1992;  72 1631-1648
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ferro A, Graupera J L, Blasco M T, Barceló O, Antón E. Kinematic analysis of running in blind sprinters.  Investigación en Ciencias del Deporte. 1996;  12 9-50
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 García-López J. Technological applications for the biomechanical assessment of the vertical jump kinematics and the functional evaluation of the anaerobic threshold in soccer. University of León; Doctoral Thesis 2000: 120-125
    Google Scholar
  • 13 García-López J, Rodríguez-Marroyo J A, Morante J C, Villa-Vicente J G. A comparison of vertical jump performance between Bosco and Sargent methods.  Archivos de Medicina del Deporte. 1999;  16 553
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 García-López J, Rodríguez-Marroyo J A, Peleteiro J, Morante J C, Villa-Vicente J G. Design and validation of a system for the valuation biomechanics of the vertical jump (SportJump-v1. 0). II Congress of the European Federation of Sports Medicine.  Archivos de Medicina del Deporte. 2001;  18 526-527
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 García-López J, Villa-Vicente J G, Morante J C, Moreno C. The influence of the preseason training program on the explosive force and velocity in a professional soccer team and an amateur one that belongs to the same soccer club. Apunts.  Educación Física y Deportes. 2001;  63 46-62
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Gavilanes M B, Anza M S. Are ground reaction forces symmetrical in normal gait?.  Investigación en Ciencias del Deporte. 1999;  21 57-68
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Germain P, Guevel A, Hogrel J Y, Marini J F. The incidence of moving velocity and joint angle in the biomechanical and electrophysiological parameters along an extension movement of the lower limbs.  Sci Sports. 1996;  11 39-45
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gregor R J, Edgerton V R, Perrine J J, Campion D S, Debus C. Torque-velocity relationships and muscle fiber composition in elite female athletes.  J Appl Physiol. 1979;  47 388-392
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hatze H. Validity and reliability of methods for testing vertical jumping performance.  J Appl Biomech. 1998;  14 127-140
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hertogh C, Micallef J P, Vaissière F. A test for maximal power valuation.  Sci Sports. 1991;  6 185-191
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hudson J L, Owen M G. Performance of females with respect to males: the use of stored elastic energy. Winter DA, Norman RW, Wells RP, Hayes KC, Patla AE Biomechanics IX-A. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics 1985: 50-54
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Kibele A. Possibilities and limitations in the biomechanical analysis of countermovement jumps: a methodological study.  J Appl Biomech. 1998;  14 105-117
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lee S C, Becker C N, Binder-Macleod S A. Catchlike-inducing train activation of human muscle during isotonic contractions: burst modulation.  J Appl Physiol. 1999;  87 1758-1767
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 MacDougal J D, Wenger H A, Green A J. Physiological Testing of the High-performance Athlete. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics 1991: 25
    Google Scholar
  • 25 McClay I R, Robinson J R, Andriacchi T P, Frederick E C, Gross T, Martin P, Valiant G, Williams K R, Cavanagh P R. A profile of ground reaction forces in professional basketball.  J Appl Biomech. 1994;  10 222-236
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Morgenstern R, Porta J, Ribas J, Parrero J L, Ruano D. Comparative analysis of Bosco's test using “3-D peak performance” video techniques.  Apunts. 1992;  29 225-231
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Munro C F, Miller D I, Fuglevand A J. Ground reaction forces in running: a reexamination.  J Biomech. 1987;  20 147-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Nigg B M. The validity and relevance of tests for the assessment of sports surfaces.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1990;  22 131-139
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Nigg B M, Bahlsen H A, Luethi L M, Stokes S. The influence of running velocity and midsole hardness on external impact forces in heel-toe running.  J Biomech. 1987;  20 951-959
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Péres G, Vandewalle H, Monod H. A comparison of three methods that estimate the maximal anaerobic power in the lower limbs.  Cinesiologie. 1988;  27 241-249
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Petrov B C, Zujev V N. The graviton, a device for measuring jumping capacity in athletes and determine their force-velocity characters.  Teor Prakt Fiz Kult. 1987;  9 54-55
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Psion organiser. Users' Guide. Barcelona; Mac Graph 1996: 12
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Ricard M D, Veatch S. Effect of running speed and aerobic dance jump height on vertical ground reaction forces.  J Appl Biomech. 1994;  10 14-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Sargent D A. Physical test of man.  Am Phys Rev. 1921;  26 188
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Sebert P, Barthelemy L. Anaerobic alactic power: measurement or assessment?.  Science and Sports. 1993;  8 269-270
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Sebert P, Barthelemy L, Dietman Y, Douguet C, Boulay J A. A simple device for measuring a vertical jump: description and results.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1990;  61 271-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Viitasalo J T, Rahkila P, Oesterback L, Alen M. Vertical jumping height and horizontal overhead throwing velocity in young male athletes.  J Sports Sci. 1992;  10 401-413
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Viitasalo J T, Luhtanen P, Monone H V, Norvapalo K, Paavolainene L, Salonen M. Photocell contact mat; a new instrument to measure contact and flight times in running.  J Appl Biomech. 1997;  13 254-266
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Villa-Vicente J G, García-López J, Morante J C, Moreno C. Explosive force profile and speed in soccer players professional and amateurs.  Archivos de Medicina del Deporte. 1999;  17 315-324
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Winter E M, Brown D, Roberts N K, Brookes F B, Swaine I L. Optimized and corrected peak power output during friction-braked cycle ergometry.  J Sports Sci. 1996;  14 513-521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

J. García-López

ICAFD de Castilla y León · Universidad de León

Campus de Vegazana S/N

24071 León

Spain

Telefon: + 34987293018

Fax: + 34 9 87 29 30 08

eMail: inejgl@unileon.es

      >