PDF herunterladen
Radiologie up2date 2004; 4(2): 151-176
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-825712
Urogenitale Radiologie
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Stand der radiologischen Bildgebung in der Diagnostik von Erkrankungen der Nieren und oberen Harnwege bei Erwachsenen

State of Radiologic Imaging in the Diagnosis of Disorders of the Kidneys and Upper Urinary Tract in Adult PatientsC.  Nolte-Ernsting1
  • 1Klinik und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
19. Juli 2004 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik

Zusammenfassung

In der bildgebenden Diagnostik der Nieren und ableitenden Harnwege vollzieht sich ein Wandel, fort von der klassischen urographischen Darstellung hin zu den modernen Schnittbildverfahren. Die vorliegende Übersicht erörtert den heutigen Stellenwert von intravenöser Urographie, Sonographie, CT und MRT für die Nieren- und Harnwegsdiagnostik bei erwachsenen Patienten. Der Schwerpunkt liegt auf der Effizienz moderner CT- und MR-Untersuchungstechniken zur Erfassung der für die Klinik relevanten diagnostischen Kriterien bei urologischen Erkrankungen wie Urolithiasis, Nierenzellkarzinom, intrinsischen und extrinsischen Harnwegstumoren sowie traumatischen Nierenverletzungen. Strategische Aspekte zum bevorzugten Einsatz der verschiedenen Modalitäten werden ebenfalls berücksichtigt.

Abstract

Diagnostic imaging of the kidneys and urinary tract presently undergoes a change from the classic urographic display to modern cross sectional imaging. This review article presents the current state of intravenous urography, ultrasonography, CT, and MRI for imaging the kidneys and the collecting system in adult patients. Major emphasis is on the efficiency of modern CT and MRI procedures in providing diagnostic information on clinically relevant urologic disorders, such as urolithiasis, renal cell carcinoma, intrinsic and extrinsic tumors of the urinary tract, and renal trauma. This includes the strategic aspects for the preferential use of the diverse modalities.

Key words

Kidneys - CT urinary tract - MR urinary tract - CT urography - MR urography - Renal cell carcinoma - Transitional cell carcinoma - Urolithiasis

Literatur

  • 1 Allkemper T, Tombach B, Heindel W. Gd-BOPTA-gestützte MR-Ausscheidungsurographie ohne Diuretikagabe.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2001;  173 115-120
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Amis E S Jr. Epitaph for the urogram.  Radiology. 1999;  213 639-640
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Boridy I C, Nikolaidis P, Kawashima A, Goldman S M, Sandler C M. Ureterolithiasis: value of the tail sign in differentiating phleboliths from ureteral calculi at nonenhanced helical CT.  Radiology. 1999;  211 619-621
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Boulay I, Holtz P, Foley W D, White B, Begun F P. Ureteral calculi: diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients.  AJR. 1999;  172 1485-1490
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Buckley J A, Urban B A, Soyer P, Scherrer A, Fishman E K. Transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis: a retrospective look at CT staging with pathologic correlation.  Radiology. 1996;  201 194-198
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Catalano O, Fraioli F, Laghi A. et al . High-resolution multidetector CT in the preoperative evaluation of patients with renal cell carcinoma.  AJR. 2003;  180 1271-1277
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Catalano O, Nunziata A, Altei F, Siani A. Suspected ureteral colic: primary helical CT versus selective helical CT after unenhanced radiography and sonography.  AJR. 2002;  178 379-387
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cohnen M, Jung G, Fritz B, Saleh A, Fürst G, Mödder U. Moderne bildgebende Verfahren: MR-Urographie.  Urologe [A]. 2002;  41 542-547
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Curry N S, Cochran S T, Bissada N K. Cystic renal masses: accurate Bosniak classification requires adequate renal CT.  AJR. 2000;  175 339-342
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Curry N S. Imaging of small solid renal mass.  Abdom Imaging. 2002;  27 629-636
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dalla Palma L, Pozzi-Mucelli R, Stacul F. Present-day imaging of patients with renal colic.  Eur Radiol. 2001;  11 4-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Dalla Palma L. What is left of i. v. urography?.  Eur Radiol. 2001;  11 931-939
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Denton E R, Mackenzie A, Greenwell T, Popert R, Rankin S C. Unenhanced helical CT for renal colic: is the radiation dose justifiable?.  Clin Radiol. 1999;  54 444-447
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Etemad A, Brems-Dalgaard E, Thomsen H S. Outcome of intravenous urography in the year 2000.  Abdom Imaging. 2003;  28 226-229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Fielding J R, Silverman S G, Samuel S, Zou K H, Loughlin K R. Unenhanced helical CT or ureteral stones: a replacement for excretory urography in planning treatment.  AJR. 1998;  171 1051-1053
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Fielding J R, Steele G, Fox L A, Heller H, Loughlin K R. Spiral computerized tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain: a replacement for excretory urography.  J Urol. 1997;  157 2071-2073
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Filipas D, Spix C, Schulz-Lampel D, Michaelis J, Hohenfellner R, Roth S, Thüroff J W. Screening for renal cell carcinoma using ultrasonography: a feasibility study.  BJU International. 2003;  91 595-599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Froom P, Ribak J, Benbassat J. Significance of microhaematuria in young adults.  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984;  288 20-22
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Grossfeld G D, Litwin M S, Wolf J S Jr, Hricak H, Shuler C L, Agerter D C, Carrol P R. Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy - part I: definition, detection, prevalence, and etiology.  Urology. 2001;  57 599-603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Grossfeld G D, Litwin M S, Wolf J S, Hricak H, Shuler C L, Agerter D C, Carrol P R. Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy - part II: patient evaluation, cytology, voided markers, imaging, cystoscopy, nephrology evaluation, and follow-up.  Urology. 2001;  57 604-610
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hamm M, Knöpfle E, Wartenberg S, Wawroschek F, Weckermann D, Harzmann R. Low dose unenhanced helical computerized tomography fort he evaluation of acute flank pain.  J Urol. 2002;  167 1687-1691
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Harisinghani M G, Barentzs J, Hahn P F. et al . Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer.  N Engl J Med. 2003;  348 2491-2499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Harris A C, Zwirewich C V, Lyburn I D, Torregiani W C, Marchinkow L O. CT findings in blunt renal trauma.  Radiographics. 2001;  21 201-214
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Heiss S G, Shifrin R Y, Sommer F G. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-echo renal MR imaging: evaluation of vascular and nonvascular disease.  Radiographics. 2000;  20 1341-1352
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hélénon O, Correas J M, Balleyguier C, Ghouadni M, Cornud F. Ultrasound of renal tumors.  Eur Radiol. 2001;  11 1890-1901
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Huda W. Radiation dosimetry in diagnostic radiology.  AJR. 1997;  169 1487-1488
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Israel G M, Bosniak M A. Calcification in cystic renal masses: is it important in diagnosis?.  Radiology. 2003;  226 47-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Israel G M, Bosniak M A. Follow-up of moderately complex cystic lesions of the kidney (Bosniak category IIF).  AJR. 2003;  181 627-633
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Jung P, Brauers A, Nolte-Ernsting C A, Jakse G, Günther R W. Magnetic resonance urography enhanced by gadolinium and diuretics: a comparison with conventional urography in diagnosing the cause of ureteric obstruction.  BJU International. 2000;  86 960-965
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kopka L, Fischer U, Zoeller G, Schmidt C, Ringert R H, Grabbe E. Dual-phase helical CT of the kidney: value of the corticomedullary and nephrographic phase for evaluation of renal lesions and preoperative staging of renal cell carcinoma.  AJR. 1997;  169 1573-1578
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Kopka L, Rogalla P, Hamm B. Mehrschicht-Spiral-CT des Abdomens: Aktuelle Indikationen und zukünftige Trends.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2002;  174 273-282
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Krestin G P. Magnetic resonance imaging of the kidneys: current status.  Magn Reson Q. 1994;  10 2-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Kundra V, Silverman P M. Imaging in the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of cancer of the urinary baldder.  AJR. 2003;  180 1045-1054
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Lang E K, Macchia R J, Thomas R. et al . Computerized tomography tailored for the assessment of microscopic hematuria.  J Urol. 2002;  167 547-554
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Lang E K, Macchia R J, Thomas R. et al . Improved detection of renal pathologic features on multiphasic helical CT compared with IVU in patients presenting with microscopic hematuria.  Urology. 2003;  61 528-532
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Levine J A, Neitlich J, Verga M, Dalrymple N, Smith R C. Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: corelation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT.  Radiology. 1997;  204 27-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Liu W, Esler S J, Kenny B J, Goh R H, Rainbow A J, Stevenson G W. Low-dose nonenhanced helical CT of renal colic: assessment of ureteric stone detection and measurement of effective dose equivalent.  Radiology. 2000;  215 51-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Miller O F, Rineer S K, Reichard S R. et al . Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urogram in the evaluation of acute flank pain.  Urology. 1998;  52 982-987
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Motley G, Dalrymple N, Keesling C, Fischer J, Harmon W. Hounsfield unit density in the determination of urinary stone composition.  Urology. 2001;  58 170-173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Mueller-Lisse U G, Mueller-Lisse U L, Hinterberger J, Schneede P, Reiser M F. Tri-phasic MDCT in the diagnosis of urothelial cancer.  Eur Radiol. 2003;  13 [Suppl 1] 146-147
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Müller-Mattheis V, Seifert H, Ackermann R. Eine neue Sicht der Dinge.  Urologe [A]. 2002;  41 540-541
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Nakada S Y, Hoff D G, Attai S, Heisey D, Blankenbaker D, Pozniak M. Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting.  Urology. 2000;  55 816-819
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Nascimento A B, Mitchell D G, Zhang X-M. et al . Rapid MR imaging detection of renal cysts: age-based standards.  Radiology. 2001;  221 628-632
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Niall O, Russel J, MacGregor R, Duncan H, Mullins J. A comparison of noncontrast computerized tomography with excretory urography in the assessment of acute flank pain.  J Urol. 1999;  161 534-537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Nikken J J, Krestin G P. Magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of renal masses.  BJU International. 2000;  86 58-69
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Nolte-Ernsting C, Bücker A, Adam G. et al . Gadolinium-enhanced excretory MR urography after low-dose diuretic injection: comparison with conventional excretory urography.  Radiology. 1998;  209 147-157
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Nolte-Ernsting C, Staatz G, Wildberger J, Adam G. MR-Urographie und CT-Urographie: Prinzipien, Untersuchungstechniken, Anwendungsmöglichkeiten.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2003;  175 211-222
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Nolte-Ernsting C CA, Staatz G, Tacke J, Günther R W. MR urography today.  Abdom Imaging. 2003;  28 191-209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Nolte-Ernsting C CA, Tacke J, Adam G B, Haage P, Jung P, Jakse G, Günther R W. Diuretic-enhanced gadolinium excretory MR urography: comparison of conventional gradient-echo sequences and echo-planar imaging.  Eur Radiol. 2001;  11 18-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Plante P, Smayra T, Bouchard L, Joffre F, Seguin P, Escourrou G, Otal P. Ureteral tumors. In: Joffre F, Otal P, Soulie M (Hrsg) Radiological Imaging of the ureter. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York; Springer 2003: 127-153
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Ripollés T, Agramunt M, Errando J, Martinez M J, Coronel B, Morales M. Suspected ureteral colic: plain film and sonography vs unenhanced helical CT. A prospective study in 66 patients.  Eur Radiol. 2004;  14 129-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Rohrschneider W K, Haufe S, Clorius J H, Tröger J. MR to assess renal function in children.  Eur Radiol. 2003;  13 1033-1045
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Roubidoux M A, Dunnick N R, Sostman H D, Leder R A. Renal carcinoma: detection of venous extension with gradient-echo MR imaging.  Radiology. 1992;  182 269-272
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Ruppert-Kohlmayr A J, Stacher R, Preidler K W, Zigeuner R, Primus G, Ricabonna M, Szolar D H. Nativ-Spiral-Computertomographie bei Patienten mit akutem Flankenschmerz - Sinn oder Unsinn?.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 1999;  170 168-173
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Saw K C, McAteer J A, Monga A G, Chua G T, Lingeman J E, Williams J C. Helical CT of urinary calculi: effect of stone composition, stone size, and scan collimation.  AJR. 2000;  175 329-332
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Schlichter A, Schubert R, Werner W, Zermann D H, Schubert J. How accurate is diagnostic imaging in determination of size and multifocality of renal cell carcinoma as a prerequisite for nephron-sparing surgery?.  Urol Int. 2000;  64 192-197
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Schmidt T, Hohl C, Haage P. et al . Diagnostic accuracy of phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging versus fundamental B-mode sonography in the evaluation of focal lesions of the kidney.  AJR. 2003;  180 1639-1647
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Schoenberg S O, Bock M, Aumann S. et al . Quantitative Erfassung der renalen Funktion mit der Magnetresonanztomographie.  Radiologe. 2000;  40 925-937
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Schreyer H H, Uggowitzer M M, Ruppert-Kohlmayr A. Helical-CT of the urinary organs.  Eur Radiol. 2002;  12 575-591
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Schubert R A, Göckeritz S, Mentzel H J, Rzanny R, Schubert J, Kaiser W A. Imaging in ureteral complications of renal transplantation: value of static fluid MR urography.  Eur Radiol. 2000;  10 1152-1157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Schwartz B F, Schenkman N, Armenakas N A, Stoller M L. Imaging characteristics of indinavir calculi.  J Urol. 1999;  161 1085-1087
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Scialpi M, di Maggio A, Midiri M. et al . Small renal masses: assessment of lesion characterization and vascularity on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with fat suppression.  AJR. 2000;  175 751-757
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Semelka R C, Shoenut J P, Kroeker M A. et al . renal lesions: controlled comparison between CT and 1.5-T MR imaging with nonenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo and breath-hold FLASH techniques.  Radiology. 1992;  182 425-430
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Semelka R C, Shoenut J P, Magro C M, Kroeker M A, MacMahon R, Greenberg H M. Renal cancer staging: comparison of contrast-enhanced fat-suppression spin-echo and gradient-echo MR imaging.  JMRI. 1993;  3 597-602
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Sheafor D H, Hertzberg B S, Freed K S. et al . Nonenhanced helical CT and US in the emergency evaluation of patients with renal colic: prospective comparison.  Radiology. 2000;  217 792-797
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Sheth S, Scatarige J C, Horton K M, Corl F M, Fishman E K. Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of renal cell carcinoma: role of multidetector CT and three-dimensional CT.  Radiographics. 2001;  21 237-254
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Studer U E, Scherz S, Scheidegger J, Kraft R, Sonntag R, Ackermann D, Zingg E J. Enlargement of regional lymph nodes in renal cell carcinoma is often not due to metastases.  J Urol. 1990;  144 243-245
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Sudah M, Vanninen R L, Partanen K. et al . Patients with acute flank pain: comparison of MR urography with unenhanced helica CT.  Radiology. 2002;  223 98-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Szolar D H, Kammerhuber F, Altziebler S, Tillich M, Breinl E, Fotter R, Schreyer H H. Multiphasic helical CT of the kidney: increased conspicuity for detection and characterization of small (< 3 cm) renal masses.  Radiology. 1997;  202 211-217
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Tack D, Sourtzis S, Delpierre I, de Maertelaer V, Gevenois P A. Low-dose unenhanced CT of patients with suspected renal colic.  AJR. 2003;  180 305-311
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Thoeny H C, Hoppe H. Native Spiral-CT bei Urolithiasis: Indikation, Durchführung und Interpretation.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2003;  175 904-910
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Walter C, Kruessell M, Gindele A, Brochhagen H G, Gossmann A, Landwehr P. Imaging of renal lesions: evaluation of fast MRI and helical CT.  BJR. 2003;  76 696-703
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Welch T J, LeRoy A J. Helical and electron beam CT scanning in the evaluation of renal vein involvement in patients with renal cell carcinoma.  J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997;  21 467-471
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Wittekind C, Meyer H J, Bootz F (Hrsg). TNM Klassifikation maligner Tumoren. 6. Auflage. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York; Springer 2003: 181-189
    Google Scholar
  • 75 Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Arslan G, Özkaynak C, Karaali K, Kabaalioğlu A, Lüleci E. Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi.  Eur Radiol. 1998;  8 212-217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Prof. Dr. med. Claus Nolte-Ernsting

Radiologisches Zentrum · Klinik und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie · Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Martinistr. 52 · 20246 Hamburg

Telefon: +49(0)40 42803-3810

Fax: +49(0)40 42803-3802

eMail: c.nolte-ernsting@uke.uni-hamburg.de

      >