PDF herunterladen
Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2004; 47(5): 278-283
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-830093
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Impact of Neuronavigation and Image-Guided Extensive Resection for Adult Patients with Supratentorial Malignant Astrocytomas: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study

M.  Kurimoto1 , N.  Hayashi1 , H.  Kamiyama1 , S.  Nagai1 , T.  Shibata1 , T.  Asahi1 , N.  Matsumura1 , Y.  Hirashima1 , S.  Endo1
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Toyama, Japan
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
02. Dezember 2004 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Neuronavigation has become an effective therapeutic modality and is used routinely for intra-axial tumor removal. This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the clinical impact of neuronavigation and image-guided extensive resection for adult patients with supratentorial malignant astrocytomas. Between 1990 and 2002, 76 adult patients with pathologically confirmed malignant astrocytomas underwent craniotomy and removal of the tumors at the Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital. Of these 76 patients, 42 were treated using neuronavigation with conventional microneurosurgery and the other 34 were treated with conventional microneurosurgery alone. Postoperative early MRI with contrast enhancement was done, and gross total resection was defined as the complete absence of residual tumor. Survival time was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were obtained from the Cox proportional hazards model. In univariate analysis, age (< 65), grade 3, preoperative KPS (≥ 80), use of neuronavigation, and gross total resection were significantly associated with longer survival. However, when the data were submitted to multivariate analysis, grade 3, preoperative KPS (≥ 80), and gross total resection were independent prognostic factors. The median survival periods of patients receiving gross total resection (vs. partial resection) and neuronavigation (vs. no neuronavigation) were 16 (vs. 9) months and 16 (vs. 10) months, respectively. The percentage of a gross total resection was significantly higher in the neuronavigation group compared to that in the no-navigation group (64.3 % vs. 38.2 %, p < 0.05). Neurological deterioration occurred in 4 of 42 (9.5 %) and in 6 of 34 (17.6 %) patients after surgery with neuronavigation and surgery without neuronavigation, respectively, although this difference was not statistically significant. Our results showed that neuronavigation increases the radicality in the resection of malignant astrocytomas and is objectively useful for improving survival time.

Key words

Malignant astrocytomas - neuronavigation - radical resection - survival

References

  • 1 Albert F K, Forsting M, Sartor K, Adams H P, Kunze S. Early postoperative magnetic resonance imaging after resection of malignant glioma: Objective evaluation of residual tumor and its influence on regrowth and prognosis.  Neurosurgery. 1994;  34 45-60
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Ammirati M, Vick N, Liao Y L, Ciric I, Mikhael M. Effect of the extent of surgical resection on survival and quality of life in patients with supratentorial glioblastomas and anaplastic astrocytomas.  Neurosurgery. 1987;  21 201-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Daneyemez M, Gezen F, Canakci Z, Kahraman S. Radical surgery and reoperation in supratentorial malignant glial tumors.  Minim Invasive Neurosurgery. 1998;  41 209-213
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Devaux B C, O'Fallon J R, Kelly P J. Resection, biopsy, and survival in malignant glial neoplasms: A retrospective study of clinical parameters, therapy, and outcome.  J Neurosurg. 1993;  78 767-775
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jeremic B, Grujicic D, Antunovic V, Djuric L, Stojanovic M, Shibamoto Y. Influence of extent of surgery and tumor location on treatment outcome of patients with glioblastoma multiforme treated with combined modality approach.  J Neurooncol. 1994;  21 177-185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Keles G E, Anderson B, Berger M S. The effect of extent of resection on time to tumor progression and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme of the cerebral hemisphere.  Surg Neurol. 1999;  52 371-379
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kiwit J C, Floeth F W, Bock W J. Survival in malignant glioma. Analysis of prognostic factors with special regard to cytoreductive surgery.  Zentralbl Neurochir. 1996;  57 76-88
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kreth F W, Berlis A, Spiropoulou V, Faist M, Scheremet R, Rossner R, Volk B, Ostertag C B. The role of tumor resection in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme in adults.  Cancer. 1999;  86 2117-2123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney D R, Gokaslan Z L, Shi W, DeMonte F, Lang F F, McCutcheon I E, Hassenbusch S J, Holland E, Hess K, Michael C, Miller D, Sawaya R. A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: Prognosis, extent of resection, and survival.  J Neurosurg. 2001;  95 190-198
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Scott J N, Rewcastle N B, Brasher P M, Fulton D, MacKinnon J A, Hamilton M, Cairncross J G, Forsyth P. Which glioblastoma multiforme patient will become a long-term survivor? A population-based study.  Ann NeuroI. 1999;  46 183-188
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Shinoda J, Sakai N, Murase S, Yano H, Matsuhisa T, Funakoshi T. Selection of eligible patients with supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme for gross total resection.  J Neurooncol. 2001;  52 161-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Coffey R J, Lunsford L D, Taylor F H. Survival after stereotactic biopsy of malignant gliomas.  Neurosurgery. 1988;  22 465-473
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Curran Jr W J, Scott C B, Horton J, Nelson J S, Weinstein A S, Fischbach A J, Chang C H, Rotman M, Asbell S O, Krisch R E. Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group malignant glioma trials.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;  85 704-710
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hess K R. Extent of resection as a prognostic variable in the treatment of gliomas.  J Neurooncol. 1999;  42 227-231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hollerhage H G, Zumkeller M, Becker M, Dietz H. Influence of type and extent of surgery on early results and survival time in glioblastoma multiforme.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1991;  113 31-37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kreth F W, Warnke P C, Scheremet R, Ostertag C B. Surgical resection and radiation therapy versus biopsy and radiation therapy in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme.  J Neurosurg. 1993;  78 762-766
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Nazzaro J M, Neuwelt E A. The role of surgery in the management of supratentorial intermediate and high-grade astrocytomas in adults.  J Neurosurg. 1990;  73 331-344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Quigley M R, Maroon J C. The relationship between survival and the extent of the resection in patients with supratentorial malignant gliomas.  Neurosurgery. 1991;  29 385-389
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kowalczuk A, Macdonald R L, Amidei C, Dohrmann 3rd G, Erickson R K, Hekmatpanah J, Krauss S, Krishnasamy S, Masters G, Mullan S F, Mundt A J, Sweeney P, Vokes E E, Weir B K, Wollman R L. Quantitative imaging study of extent of surgical resection and prognosis of malignant astrocytomas.  Neurosurgery. 1997;  41 1028-1038
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Salminen E, Nuutinen I M, Huhtala S. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in 106 patients with malignant glioma.  Eur J Cancer. 1996;  32A 1918-1923
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Vuorinen V, Hinkka S, Farkkila M, Jaaskelainen J. Debulking or biopsy of malignant glioma in elderly people: A randomised study.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003;  145 5-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Golfinos J G, Fitzpatrick B C, Smith L R, Spetzler R F. Clinical use of a frameless stereotactic arm: Results of 325 cases.  J Neurosurg. 1995;  83 197-205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Gumprecht H K, Widenka D C, Lumenta C B. BrainLab VectorVision Neuronavigation System: Technology and clinical experiences in 131 cases.  Neurosurgery. 1999;  44 97-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hayashi N, Endo S, Kurimoto M, Nishijo H, Ono T, Takaku A. Functional image guided neurosurgical simulation system using computerized three-dimensional graphics and dipole tracing.  Neurosurgery. 1995;  37 694-703
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kato A, Yoshimine T, Hayakawa T, Tomita Y, Ikeda T, Mitomo M, Harada K, Mogami H. A frameless, armless navigational system for computer-assisted neurosurgery: Technical note.  J Neurosurg. 1991;  74 845-849
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kelly P K, Kall B A, Goerss S, Earnest IV F. Computer-assisted stereotaxic laser resection of intra-axial brain neoplasms.  J Neurosurg. 1986;  64 427-439
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Roberts D W, Strohbehn J W, Hatch J F, Murray W, Kettenberger H. A frameless stereotaxic integration of computerized tomographic imaging and the operating microscope.  J Neurosurg. 1986;  65 545-549
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Roessler K, Ungersboeck K, Dietrich W, Aichholzer M, Hittmeir K, Matula C, Czech T, Koos W I. Frameless stereotactic guided neurosurgery: Clinical experience with an infrared based pointer device navigation system.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1997;  39 551-559
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Spetzger U, Loborde G, Glisbach J M. Frameless neuronavigation in modern neurosurgery.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1995;  38 163-166
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Watanabe E, Watanabe T, Manaka S, Mayanagi Y, Takakura K. Three-dimensional digitizer (neuronavigator): New equipment for computed tomography-guided stereotaxic surgery.  Surg Neurol. 1987;  27 543-547
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Wirtz C R, Albert F K, Schwaderer M, Heuer C, Staubert A, Tronnier V M, Knauth M, Kunze S. The benefit of neuronavigation for neurosurgery analyzed by its impact on glioblastoma surgery.  Neurol Res. 2000;  22 354-360
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Yoshida J, Kajita Y, Wakabayashi T, Sugita K. Long-term follow-up results of 175 patients with malignant glioma: Importance of radical tumour resection and postoperative adjuvant therapy with interferon, ACNU and radiation.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1994;  127 55-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Barker 2nd F G, Chang S M, Larson D A, Sneed P K, Wara W M, Wilson C B, Prados M D. Age and radiation response in glioblastoma multiforme.  Neurosurgery. 201;  49 1288-1298
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Salcman M. The value of cytoreductive surgery.  Clin Neurosurg. 1993;  41 464-488
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Coenen V, Krings T, Mayfrank L, Polin R, Reinges M, Thron A, Gilsbach J. Three dimensional visualization of the pyramidal tract in a neuronavigation system during brain tumor surgery: First experiences and technical note.  Neurosurgery. 2001;  49 86-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Jannin P, Morandi X, Fleig O. Integration of sulcal and functional information for multimodal neuronavigation.  J Neurosurg. 2002;  96 713-723
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 McDonald J D, Chong B W, Lewine J D, Jones G, Burr R B, McDonald P R, Koehler S B, Tsuruda J, Orrison W W, Heilbrun M P. Integration of preoperative and intraoperative functional brain mapping in a frameless stereotactic environment for lesions near eloquent cortex: Technical note.  J Neurosurg. 1999;  90 591-598
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Roux F E, Ibarrola D, Tremoulet M, Lazorthes Y, Henry P, Sol J C, Berry I. Methodological and technical issues for integrating functional magnetic resonance imaging data in a neuronavigational system.  Neurosurgery. 2001;  49 1145-1156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Meyer R, Bates L, Goerss S, Friedman J, Windschitl W, Duffy J, Perkins W. Awake craniotomy for aggressive resection of primary gliomas located in eloquent brain.  Mayo Clin Proc. 2001;  76 677-687
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Taylor M D, Bernstein M. Awake craniotomy with brain mapping as the routine surgical approach to treating patients with supratentorial intraaxial tumors: A prospective trial of 200 cases.  J Neurosurg. 1999;  90 35-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Unsgaard G, Ommedal S, Muller T, Gronningsaeter A, Nagelhus Hernes T A. Neuronavigation by intraoperative three-dimensional ultrasound: Initial experience during brain tumor resection.  Neurosurgery. 2002;  50 804-812
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Bradley W G. Achieving gross total resection of brain tumors: Intraoperative MR scanning can make a big difference.  Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;  23 348-349
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Kanner A A, Vogelbaum M A, Mayberg M R, Weisenberger J P, Barnett G H. Intracranial navigation by using low-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging: Preliminary experience.  J Neurosurg. 2002;  97 1115-1124
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Hastreiter P, Fahlbusch R. Intraoperative compensation for brain shift.  Surg Neurol. 2001;  56 357-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Germano I M, Villalobos H, Silvers A, Post K D. Clinical use of the optical digitizer for intracranial neuronavigation.  Neurosurgery. 1999;  45 261-270
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Nabavi A, Black P, Gering D. Serial intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging of brain shift.  Neurosurgery. 2001;  48 787-797
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Schneider J P, Schulz T, Schmidt F, Dietrich J, Lieberenz S, Trantakis C, Seifert V. Gross-total surgery of supratentorial low-grade gliomas under intraoperative MR guidance.  AJNR. 2001;  22 89-98
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Masanori KurimotoM. D. 

Department of Neurosurgery · Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University

2630 Sugitani

Toyama 930-0194

Japan

Telefon: +81-764-34-7348

Fax: +81-764-34-5034 ·

eMail: kuri3312@ms.toyama-mpu.ac.jp

      >