Dual Catalyst Control in the Chiral Diamine-Dipeptide-Catalyzed Asymmetric Michael Addition

Abstract

By example of conjugate addition of 2-nitropropane to 2-cyclohexen-1-one, it is shown that the combination of H-Leu-His-OH and (1R,2R)-(+)-1,2-diphenylethylenediamine as co-catalysts in a suitable ratio can lead to a new catalytic system for the C-C bond formation reactions. Although neither co-catalyst is sufficiently effective independently in terms of yield or enantioselectivity, their combination results in a drastic increase in yields (up to 86%) and absolute selectivities (up to 91% ee).

asymmetric organocatalysis - peptides - Michael additions - amines

References

<A NAME="RG35804ST-1A">1a</A> List B. Lerner RA. Barbas CF. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2000,  122:  2395 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-1B">1b</A> List B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2000,  122:  9336 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-1C">1c</A> Hanessian S. Pham V. Org. Lett.  2000,  2:  2975 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-1D">1d</A> Sakthivel K. Notz W. Bui T. Barbas CF. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2001,  123:  5260 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-1E">1e</A> Enders D. Seki A. Synlett  2002,  26 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-1F">1f</A> List B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2002,  124:  5656 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-1G">1g</A> Bahmanyar S. Houk KN. Martin HJ. List B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2003,  125:  2475 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-1H">1h</A> Gao MZ. Gao J. Lane BS. Zingaro RA. Chem. Lett.  2003,  32:  524 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-1I">1i</A> Vignola N. List B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2004,  126:  450 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-1J">1j</A> Bøgevig A. Sundén H. Córdova A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2004,  43:  1109 ; Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 1129

<A NAME="RG35804ST-2A">2a</A> Iyer MS. Gigstad KM. Namdev ND. Lipton M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1996,  118:  4910 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-2B">2b</A> Miller SJ. Copeland GT. Papaioannou N. Horstmann TE. Ruel EM. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1998,  120:  1629 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-2C">2c</A> Vachal P. Jacobsen EN. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2002,  124:  10012 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-2D">2d</A> Tang Z. Jiang F. Yu L.-T. Cui X. Gong L.-Z. Mi A.-Q. Jiang Y.-Z. Wu Y.-D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2003,  125:  5262 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-2E">2e</A> Martin HJ. List B. Synlett  2003,  1901 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-2F">2f</A> Kofoed J. Nielsen J. Reymond J.-L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.  2003,  13:  2445 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-2G">2g</A> Tsogoeva SB. Jagtap SB. Ardemasova ZA. Kalikhevich VN. Eur. J. Org. Chem.  2004,  4014 

Reviews:

<A NAME="RG35804ST-3A">3a</A> Dalko PI. Moisan L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2001,  40:  3726 ; Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 3840

<A NAME="RG35804ST-3B">3b</A> Gröger H. Wilken J. Angew. Chem Int. Ed.  2001,  40:  529 ; Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 545

<A NAME="RG35804ST-3C">3c</A> Jarvo ER. Miller SJ. Tetrahedron  2002,  58:  2481 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-3D">3d</A> Groeger H. Wilken J. Berkessel A. In Organic Synthesis Highlights V   Schmalz H.-G. Wirth T. VCH; Weinheim: 2003.  p.178 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-4A">4a</A> Hajos ZG. Parrish DR. J. Org. Chem.  1974,  39:  1615 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-4B">4b</A> Eder U. Sauer G. Wiechert R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.  1971,  10:  496 ; Angew. Chem. 1971, 83, 492

<A NAME="RG35804ST-4C">4c</A> Agami C. Meynier F. Puchot C. Guilhem J. Pascard C. Tetrahedron  1984,  40:  1031 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-5A">5a</A> Danishefsky S. Cain P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1976,  98:  4975 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-5B">5b</A> Hagiwara H. Uda H. J. Org. Chem.  1988,  53:  2308 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-6A">6a</A> Rossiter BE. Swingle NM. Chem. Rev.  1992,  92:  771 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-6B">6b</A> Yamaguchi M. Shiraishi T. Hirama M. J. Org. Chem.  1996,  61:  3520 

<A NAME="RG35804ST-6C">6c</A> Horstmann TE. Guerin DJ. Miller SJ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2000,  39:  3635 ; Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 3781

<A NAME="RG35804ST-7">7</A>

General Procedure for the Michael Reaction: 2-Nitro-propane (0.63 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of
2-cyclohexen-1-one (0.50 mmol), additive (0.50 mmol) and peptide catalyst (15 mol%) in pre-dried solvent (DMF or DMSO, 4 mL), and the reaction mixture was stirred at r.t. for 5 d. The solvent was evaporated and the residue was dissolved in CHCl₃ and washed with diluted aq HCl (3%). The organic layer was dried with Na₂SO₄ and filtered, and the solvents were evaporated. The residues were purified by column chromatography on SiO₂ (hexane-EtOAc) to afford the desired product. The ee of the product was determined by chiral HPLC analysis (Daicel Chiralpak AS) in comparison with authentic racemic material: n-hexan-2-propanol = 80:20, flow rate 1 mL/min, λ = 210 nm: t _R1 = 28.44 min, t _R2 = 30.31 min. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 2.48-2.34 (m, 3 H), 2.31-2.21 (m, 1 H), 2.19-2.08 (m, 2 H), 1.85-1.76 (m, 1 H), 1.71-1.53 (m, 1 H), 1.58 (s, 3 H), 1.57 (s, 3 H), 1.48-1.34 (m, 1 H) ppm. ¹³C NMR (150.8 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 208.9 (C=O), 90.6 (C_quat.), 46.5 (CH), 42.6 (CH₂), 40.7 (CH₂), 25.9 (CH₂), 24.3 (CH₂), 23.3 (CH₃), 22.5 (CH₃) ppm. ESI-MS (positive ion): m/z = 208.1 [M + Na]⁺.