Aortic Root Remodeling: Functional MRI as an Accurate Tool for Complete Follow-Up[1]

Abstract

Background: After aortic valve-sparing procedures patients should be evaluated regularly because of the risk for further disease progression in the remaining aorta as well as recurrent aortic insufficiency. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of functional MRI as a single examination for complete follow-up of these patients. Methods: Twenty-two patients with a mean age of 54 years (range 30 - 66) were prospectively examined at 1, 12, 24, 36, and 74 months postoperatively, following a Yacoub aortic root remodeling operation, using a 1.5 T MRI. The original disease was chronic aneurysm of the ascending aorta or root in 17, chronic dissection in 3, and acute dissection in 2 patients. Transverse graft diameters, regurgitant fraction, LVEDV, and cardiac index were measured using cine MRI. Results were compared to spiral computed tomography and transthoracic color Doppler echocardiography. Mean time of follow-up was 24.9 months and ranged from 1 to 74 months. Results: There were 2 re-operations, 2 years after primary surgery, due to high aortic insufficiency. CT and MRI measurements of graft diameters correlated well (p = 0.4544). Mean graft diameter (mean ± SD) was 30 ± 3.7, 33 ± 3.4, 36.5 ± 1.5, 37 ± 2.8, and 38.3 ± 2.8 mm at 1, 12, 24, 36, and 74 months, respectively, indicating a significant increase of graft diameter (p < 0.0001). Mean regurgitant fraction as determined by MRI was 14 ± 7, 12 ± 9, 13 ± 9, 15 ± 7, and 14 ± 9 % at 1, 12, 24, 36, and 74 months, respectively. Flow based grading of aortic insufficiency by MR imaging correlated well with color Doppler echocardiography (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: MRI provides an excellent, noninvasive, comprehensive tool for follow-up after valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction. The determination of regurgitant fraction, ventricular dimensions and functions, and graft diameters allows standardized imaging protocols with a high reproducibility, which may lead to this technique being favored for the follow-up of patients after aortic root remodeling.

Aortic root remodeling - magnetic resonance imaging - aortic regurgitation

References

• 1 Sarsam M A, Yacoub M H. Remodeling of the aortic valve annulus.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;  105 435-438
• 2 David T E, Feindel C M. An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;  103 617-621
• 3 Otterstad J E, Froeland G, St.-John-Sutton M, Holme I. Accuracy and reproducibility of biplane two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements of the left ventricular dimensions and function.  Eur Heart J. 1997;  18 507-513
• 4 Sahn D J. Instrumentation and physical factors related to visualization of stenotic and regurgitant jets by Doppler color flow mapping.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;  12 1354-1365
• 5 Globits S, Higgins C B. Assessment of valvular heart disease by magnetic resonance imaging.  Am Heart J. 1995;  129 369-381
• 6 Søndergard L, Ståhlberg F, Thomsen C. Magnetic resonance imaging of valvular heart disease.  J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;  10 627-638
• 7 Chatzimavroudis G P, Oshinski J N, Franch R H, Pettigrew R I, Walker P G, Yoganathan A P. Quantification of the aortic regurgitant volume with magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping: a clinical investigation of the importance of imaging slice location.  J Heart Valve Dis. 1998;  7 94-101
• 8 Aebert H, Reber D, Kobuch R, Philipp A, Birnbaum D E. Aortic arch surgery using moderate systemic hypothermia and antegrade cerebral perfusion via the right subclavian artery.  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;  49 283-286
• 9 Miller S, Scheule A M, Hahn U. et al . MR angiography and flow quantification of the internal mammary artery graft after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass.  Am J Roentgenol. 1999;  172 1365-1369
• 10 Dolan M S, Castello R, Vrain St JA, Aguirre F, Labovitz A J. Quantitation of aortic regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography: a practical approach.  Am Heart J. 1995;  129 1014-1020
• 11 David T E, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Feindel C M, Webb G. Aortic valve-sparing operations in patients with aneurysms of the aortic root or ascending aorta.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;  74 S1758-1761
• 12 Yacoub M H, Gehle P, Chandrasekaran V, Birks E J, Child A, Radley-Smith R. Late results of a valve-preserving operation in patients with aneurysms of the ascending aorta and root.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;  115 1080-1090
• 13 Kallenbach K, Hagl C, Walles T. et al . Results of valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction in 158 consecutive patients.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;  74 2026-2033
• 14 Westaby S, Katsumata T, Freitas E. Aortic valve conservation in acute type A dissection.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;  64 1108-1112
• 15 David T E, Armstrong S, Ivanov J, Feindel C M, Omran A, Webb G. Results of valve-sparing operations.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;  122 39-46
• 16 Strotzer M, Aebert H, Lenhart M. et al . Morphology and hemodynamics in dissection of the descending aorta: assessment with MR imaging.  Acta Radiol. 2000;  41 594-600
• 17 Lepore V, Lamm C, Bugge M, Larsson S. Magnetic resonance imaging in the follow-up of patients after aortic root reconstruction.  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;  44 188-192
• 18 Quint L E, Francis I R, Wiliams D M, Monaghan H M, Deeb G M. Synthetic interposition grafts of the thoracic aorta: postoperative appearance on serial CT studies.  Radiology. 1999;  211 317-324
• 19 Rofsky N M, Weinreb J C, Grossi E A. et al . Aortic aneurysm and dissection: normal MR imaging and CT findings after surgical repair with the continuous-suture graft-inclusion technique.  Radiology. 1993;  186 195-201
• 20 Hundley W G, Li H F, Hillis L D. et al . Quantitation of cardiac output with velocity-encoded, phase-difference magnetic resonance imaging.  Am J Cardiology. 1995;  75 1250-1255

1 Presented at the 32nd annual meeting of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, February 23 - 26, 2003 in Leipzig, Germany