Psychiatr Prax 2006; 33(2): 59-66
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-866932
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Der Einbezug von Nutzern psychiatrischer Angebote in die psychiatrische Versorgungsforschung

User Involvement in Mental Health Services ResearchSilvia  Krumm1 , Thomas  Becker1
  • 1Abteilung Psychiatrie II der Universität Ulm, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
24. Februar 2006 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Das Konzept des Einbezugs von Nutzern in Projekte der psychiatrischen Versorgungsforschung wird insbesondere in Großbritannien diskutiert und praktiziert. Methode: Literaturübersicht. Das Konzept wird unter Berücksichtigung der relevanten Literatur vorgestellt und anhand von Praxisbeispielen aus Großbritannien veranschaulicht. Ergebnis/Diskussion: Inhaltliche Schwerpunkte nutzergeleiteter Studien sind subjektive Bewertung psychiatrischer Angebote, Lebenssituationen und Bewältigungsstrategien. Diskutiert werden problematische Aspekte des Konzepts. Obwohl weiterer Forschungsbedarf besteht, scheint das Konzept an Bedeutung zu gewinnen.

Abstract

Background: User involvement in mental health services research is discussed in Great Britain, and a number of user-led research initiatives can be found. In Germany, less attention is paid to the concept while virtually no initiatives can be found. Method: The concept of user involvement is introduced by reviewing the relevant literature. After discussion of theoretical and methodological implications, practicability of the concept for mental health services research is illustrated by some examples from Great Britain. Results/Discussion: User involvement in mental health services may promote the provision of user focused services. User involvement aims at the empowerment of mental health service users and can also improve the quality of mental health services research. Frequently, user-led/collaborative studies are focused on mental health service assessment. Some problematic aspects (e. g. representativeness, knowledge/skills of users) are discussed. Although more research is needed to document the additional benefit of user involvement in mental health services research it is conceivable that the concept will gain in importance.

Literatur

  • 1 Truman C, Raine P. Experience and meaning of user involvement: some explorations from a community mental health project.  Health and Social Care in the Community. 2002;  10 136-143
  • 2 Kilian R, Lindenbach I, Lobig U, Uhle M, Petscheleit A, Angermeyer M C. Indicators of empowerment and disempowerment in the subjective evaluation of the psychiatric treatment process by persons with severe and persistent mental illness: a qualitative and quantitative analysis.  Social Science and Medicine. 2003;  57 (6) 1127-1142
  • 3 Knuf A. Empowerment fördern - Beispiel Psychiatrie.  Managed Care. 2003;  7 17-19
  • 4 Bruce S, Paxton R. Ethical principals for evaluating mental health services: a critical examination.  Journal of Mental Health. 2002;  11 (3) 267-279
  • 5 Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda.  Health Policy. 2002;  61 213-236
  • 6 Oliver S, Clarke-Jones L, Rees R, Milne R, Buchanan P, Gabbay J. et al . Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach.  Health Technology Assessment. 2004;  8 (15) 1-48
  • 7 Bundesministerium für Gesundheit und Soziale Sicherung .Gutachten 2003 des Sachverständigenrates für die Konzertierte Aktion im Gesundheitswesen. Drucksache 143/03 vom 26.02.03. http://www1.bundesrat.de/coremedia/generator/Inhalt/Drucksachen/2003/0143_2D03,property=Dokument.pdf 15-6-2005
  • 8 Anselm R. Partner oder Person?. In: Scheibler F, Pfaff H (eds) Shared decision-making. Der Patient als Partner im medizinischen Entscheidungsprozess. Weinheim, München; Juventus Verlag 2003: 26-33
  • 9 Bertelsmann Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. Gütersloh, München; Wissen Media Verlag 2004
  • 10 Naidoo J, Wills J. Lehrbuch der Gesundheitsförderung. Köln; 2003
  • 11 Schürmann I. Beziehungsformen zwischen Langzeitnutzern und Professionellen im Kontext der Moderne. In: Zaumseil M, Leferink K (Hrsg) Schizophrenie in der Moderne. Modernisierung der Schizophrenie. Bonn; Psychiatrie-Verlag 1997: 239-279
  • 12 Scheibler F, Pfaff H. Shared decision-making. In: Scheibler F, Pfaff H (eds) Shared decision-making. Der Patient als Partner im medizinischen Entscheidungsprozess. Weinheim, München; Juventus Verlag 2003: 11-22
  • 13 Thornton H, Edwards A, Elwyn G. Evolving the multiple roles of ,patients‘ in health-care research: reflections after involvement in a trial of shared decision-making.  Health expectations. 2003;  6 189-197
  • 14 Hamann J, Leucht S, Kissling W. Shared decision making in psychiatry.  Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004;  107 403-409
  • 15 Schmidt-Zadel R, Kunze H. Die Zukunft hat begonnen. Personenzentrierte Hilfen - Erfahrungen und Perspektiven. Bonn; Psychiatrie-Verlag 2004
  • 16 Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (Hrsg) .Von institutions- zu personenzentrierten Hilfen in der psychiatrischen Versorgung. Bericht zum Forschungsprojekt des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit. Baden-Baden; Nomos-Verlag 1999
  • 17 Aktion psychisch Kranke (Hrsg) .Der personenzentrierte Ansatz in der psychiatrischen Versorgung. Individuelle Hilfeplanung (IBRP) und personenzentriert-integriertes Hilfesystem. 5 ed. Bonn; Psychiatrie-Verlag 2005
  • 18 Bundesverband Psychiatrie-Erfahrener (BPE) e. V. .http://www.bpe-online.de/ 15-6-2005
  • 19 Die Aktion Psychisch Kranke (APK) .http://www.psychiatrie.de/apk/wir/ 15-6-2005
  • 20 Bundesverband der Angehörigen psychisch Kranker e. V. .http://www.bapk.de/ 15-6-2005
  • 21 Simpson E, House A. Involving users in the delivery and evaluation of mental health services: systematic review.  BMJ. 2002;  325 (30) 1265-1268
  • 22 Bombosch J, Hansen H, Blume J. Trialog praktisch. Psychiatrie-Erfahrene, Angehörige und Professionelle gemeinsam auf dem Weg zur demokratischen Psychiatrie. Neumünster; Paranus Verlag 2004
  • 23 Middleton P, Stanton P, Renouf N. Consumer consultants in mental health services: addressing the challenges.  Journal of Mental Health. 2004;  13 (5) 507-518
  • 24 Leimkühler A M, Müller U. Patientenzufriedenheit - Artefakt oder soziale Tatsache?.  Nervenarzt. 1996;  67 765-773
  • 25 O'Donnell M, Entwistle V. Consumer involvement in decisions about what health-related research is funded.  Health Policy. 2004;  70 281-290
  • 26 Birkel R, Hall L, Lane T, Cohan K, Miller J. Consumers and families as partners in implementing evidence-based practice.  Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 2003;  26 867-881
  • 27 Thornicroft G, Rose D, Huxley P, Dale G, Wykes T. What are the research priorities of mental health service users?.  Journal of Mental Health. 2002;  11 (1) 1-5
  • 28 Cohen C, D'Onofrio A, Larkin L, Berkholder P, Fishman H. A comparison of consumer and provider preferences for research on homeless veterans.  Community Mental Health Journal. 1999;  35 (3) 273-280
  • 29 Williamson C. What does involving consumers in research mean?.  QJM: An International Journal of Medicine. 2001;  94 661-664
  • 30 Townend M, Braithwaite T. Mental health research - the value of user involvement.  Journal of Mental Health. 2002;  11 (2) 117-119
  • 31 Rose D. Collaborative research between users and professionals: peaks and pitfalls.  Psychiatric Bulletin. 2003;  27 404-406
  • 32 Trivedi P, Wykes T. From passive subjects to equal partners.  British Journal of Psychiatry. 2002;  181 468-472
  • 33 Consumers in NHS Research Support Unit .Involving consumers in research and development in the NHS: Briefing Notes for Researchers. London; Consumers in NHS Support Unit 2001
  • 34 Consumers in NHS Research Support Unit .Getting involved in research: a guide for consumers. http://www.invo.org.uk/pdfs/guide_for_consumers.pdf 15-6-2005
  • 35 Telford R, Faulkner A. Learning about service user involvement in mental health research.  Journal of Mental Health. 2004;  13 (6) 549-559
  • 36 Deutsches Netzwerk Evidenzbasierte Medizin DNEbM e. V. .http://www.ebm-netzwerk.de/ 15-6-2005
  • 37 Bleuler J P. EBM - ein Paradigmenwechsel.  Schweizerische Ärztezeitung. 2000;  81 (9) 454-456
  • 38 Brown C, Lloyd K. Qualitative methods in psychiatric research.  Advances in Psychiatric Treatment. 2001;  7 350-356
  • 39 Faulkner A, Thomas P. User-led research and evicence-based medicine.  British Journal of Psychiatry. 2002;  180 1-3
  • 40 Bohnsack R. Rekonstruktive Sozialforschung. Einführung in qualitative Methoden. Opladen; 2003
  • 41 Flick U. Qualitative Forschung in der Sozialpsychiatrie - Methoden und Anwendungen.  Psychiat Prax. 1995;  22 91-96
  • 42 Wykes T. Blue skies in the Journal of Mental Health? Consumers in research.  Journal of Mental Health. 2003;  12 (1) 1-6
  • 43 Robinson J. Access to employment for people with disabilities: findings of a consumer-led project.  Disability and Rehabilitation. 2000;  22 (5) 246-253
  • 44 Stevens T, Wilde D, Hunt J, Ahmedzai S. Overcoming the challenges to consumer involvement in cancer research.  Health Expectations. 2003;  6 81-88
  • 45 National Health Service .Health Research: What's in it for consumers? Report of the standing advisory group on consumer involvement in the NHS research and development programme. London; Department of Health 1998
  • 46 Rose D. User's voices. The perspectives of mental health service users on community and hospital care. London; The Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health 2001
  • 47 Rose D. ,Having a diagnosis is a qualification for the job‘.  British Medical Journal. 2003;  326 1331
  • 48 SURE - Service User Research Enterprise .Annual Report 2002 - 2003. London; 2004
  • 49 Faulkner A. Knowing our own minds. A survey of how people in emotional distress take control of their lives. London; Mental Health Foundation 1997
  • 50 Faulkner A, Layzell S. Strategies for Living: The Research Report. London; The Mental Health Foundation 2000
  • 51 McCourt C. Life after hospital closure: user's views of living in residential ,resettlement‘ projects. A case study in consumer-led research.  Health Expectations. 2000;  3 192-202
  • 52 Rose D, Wykes T, Bindman J, Fleischmann P. Information, consent, and perceived coercion: patients' perspectives on electroconvulsive therapy.  British Journal of Psychiatry. 2005;  180 549-550
  • 53 Rose D, Wykes T, Bindman J, Fleischman P. Information, consent and perceived coercion: patients' perspectives on electroconvulsive therapy.  British Journal of Psychiatry. 2005;  186 54-59
  • 54 Beinum M van. User-led research and evidence in psychiatry. Correspondence.  British Journal of Psychiatry. 2002;  180 549-550
  • 55 Entwistle V, Renfrew M, Yearley S, Forrester J, Lamont L. Lay perspectives: advantages for health research.  BMJ. 1998;  316 (7 February) 463-466
  • 56 Crawford M, Rutter D. Are the views of members of mental health user groups representative of those of ,ordinary‘ patients? A cross-sectional survey of service users and providers.  Journal of Mental Health. 2004;  13 (6) 561-568
  • 57 Service User Research Enterprise (SURE) .http://www.iop.kcl.ac.uk/iopweb/departments/home/default.aspx?locator=300 15-6-2005
  • 58 Griffiths K, Jorm A, Christensen H. Academic consumers researchers: a bridge between consumers and researchers.  Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2004;  38 191-196
  • 59 The Australian National University, Centre for Mental Health Research, Consumer Research Unit .http://www.anu.edu.au/cmhr/graduate.php 15-6-2005
  • 60 World Health Organization .Mental Health Declaration for Europe. Facing the challenges, building solutions. http://www.euro.who.int/document/mnh/edoc06.pdf 15-6-2005

Silvia Krumm(M.A.soz.) 

Abteilung Psychiatrie II der Universität Ulm · Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg

Ludwig-Heilmeyer-Straße 2

89312 Günzburg

eMail: silvia.krumm@bkh-guenzburg.de

    >