Endoscopy 2005; 37(9): 801-807
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-870241
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Clinical Evaluation of the Use of the M2A Patency Capsule System Before a Capsule Endoscopy Procedure, in Patients with Known or Suspected Intestinal Stenosis

M.  Delvaux1 , E.  Ben Soussan2 , V.  Laurent3 , E.  Lerebours2 , G.  Gay1
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine and Digestive Pathology, Hôpitaux de Brabois, CHU de Nancy, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
  • 2Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France
  • 3Department of Radiology, Hôpitaux de Brabois, CHU de Nancy, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted 20 April 2005

Accepted after Revision 7 June 2005

Publication Date:
22 August 2005 (online)

Background and Study Aim: The main complication of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is the blocking of the capsule by a gastrointestinal stenosis. The “patency capsule” is a self-dissolving capsule that is the same size as the video capsule. It contains a radiofrequency identification (RFID) tag that allows it to be detected by a scanning device placed on the abdominal wall. When its passage is blocked by a stenosis, the patency capsule dissolves in 40 - 80 hours after ingestion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of this system in patients with suspected intestinal stenosis but also requiring VCE.
Patients and Methods: 22 patients (16 men; 46 ± 18 years; 15 with diagnosed or suspected Crohn’s disease, two with suspected intestinal tumor, and two on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) were first investigated with an abdominal CT plus enteroclysis (entero-CT, n = 15) or a small-bowel follow-through (SBFT, n = 7). The patency capsule was then administered at around 09.00 to fasting patients. The presence of the patency capsule in the digestive tract was assessed 30 hours later using the hand-held scanner. When the patency capsule was detected, a plain abdominal film was obtained, and this was repeated every 24 hours until capsule expulsion.
Results: At 30 hours after ingestion, the patency capsule was detected in 17 patients (72.3 %): in the area of the small intestine (n = 6) and in the colon (n = 11). In all the patients in whom the capsule was blocked in the small intestine, the stenosis had been suspected on CT or SBFT. In three patients, the delay in progression of the patency capsule led to cancellation of the VCE procedure. In three patients, the patency capsule induced a symptomatic intestinal occlusion, which resolved spontaneously in one and required emergency surgery in two. Although these two patients would have been obliged to undergo operation for their primary disease in any case, the procedure had to be brought forward. In one patient, the capsule passed through the stenosis without symptoms. All patients in whom the progression of the patency capsule was delayed had an established or suspected diagnosis of Crohn’s disease.
Conclusions: The current technical development of the patency capsule limits its use in clinical practice, as it did not detect stenoses undiagnosed by CT or SBFT. The start of dissolution at 40 hours after ingestion is too slow to prevent episodes of intestinal occlusion. Patients with Crohn’s disease are most likely to be at risk of blockage of progression of the capsule and should benefit from a CT investigation before VCE. However, a careful interview eliciting the patient’s medical history and symptoms remains the most useful indicator with regard to suspicion of an intestinal stenosis.

References

  • 1 Iddan G, Meron G, Glukhovsky A, Swain P. Wireless capsule endoscopy.  Nature. 2000;  405 417
  • 2 Ell C, Remke S, May A. et al . The first prospective controlled trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push-enteroscopy in chronic gastrointestinal bleeding.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 685-689
  • 3 Saurin J C, Delvaux M, Gaudin J L. et al . Diagnostic value of endoscopic capsule in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: blinded comparison with video push-enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 576-584
  • 4 Herreiras J M, Caunedo A, Rodriguez-Tellez M. et al . Capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected Crohn’s disease and negative endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 1-5
  • 5 Eliakim R, Fischer D, Suissa A. et al . Wireless capsule video endoscopy is a superior diagnostic tool in comparison to barium follow-through and computerized tomography in patients with suspected Crohn’s disease.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;  15 363-367
  • 6 Mergener K, Enns R, Brandabur J J. et al . Complications and problems with capsule endoscopy: results from two referral centers [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 AB171
  • 7 Barkin J S. Wireless capsule endoscopy requiring surgical intervention: the world’s experience [abstract].  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 907
  • 8 Costamagna G, Spada C, Spera G. et al . Evaluation of the Given patency system in the GI tract: results of a multicenter study [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 AB145
  • 9 Gay G, Delvaux M, Laurent V. et al . Temporary intestinal occlusion induced by a “patency capsule” in a patient with Crohn’s disease.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 174-177
  • 10 Gay G, Delvaux M, Rey J F. The role of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in the diagnosis of digestive diseases. A review of current possibilities.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 913-920
  • 11 Laurent V, Gay G, Nicolas M. et al .Morphological investigations of the small bowel: retrospective contribution of the entero-CT and videoendoscopic capsule. In: Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program Oak Brook, Illinois; 2003: 711
  • 12 Barkin J S, O’Loughlin C. Capsule endoscopy contraindications: complications and how to avoid their occurrence.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2004;  14 61-65
  • 13 Leighton J A, Sharma V K, Srivathsan K. et al . Safety of capsule endoscopy in patients with pacemakers.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 567-569
  • 14 Burkill G J, Bell J R, Healy J C. The utility of computed tomography in acute small bowel obstruction.  Clin Radiol. 2001;  56 350-359
  • 15 Maglinte D D, Gage S N, Harmon B H. et al . Obstruction of the small intestine: accuracy and role of CT in diagnosis.  Radiology. 1993;  188 61-64
  • 16 Maconi G, Carsana L, Fociani P. et al . Small bowel stenosis in Crohn’s disease: clinical biochemical and ultrasonographic evaluation of histological features.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;  18 749-756
  • 17 Laghi A, Paolantonio P, Iafrate F. et al . MR of the small bowel with a biphasic oral contrast agent (polyethylene glycol): technical aspects and findings in patients affected by Crohn’s disease.  Radiol Med. 2003;  106 18-27
  • 18 Wutzke K D, Heine W E, Plath C. et al . Evaluation of oro-coecal transit time: a comparison of the lactose-[13C, 15N]ureide 13CO2- and the lactulose H2-breath test in humans.  Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997;  51 11-19

M. Delvaux, M. D.

Department of Internal Medicine and Digestive Pathology · Hôpitaux de Brabois Adultes · CHU de Nancy

54511 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy · France

Fax: +33-383-154012·

Email: m.delvaux@chu-nancy.fr

    >