Widespread Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of the Esophagus with Strategies for Stricture Prevention: A Preclinical Study

Background and Study Aims: Circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection of the esophagus is complicated by stricture formation. Prophylactic measures for avoiding such strictures have not been well studied. The aim of this preclinical study was to assess strategies for prevention of esophageal strictures in a porcine model following widespread endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).
Methods: A total of 18 60-kg pigs were included in the study. The roles of strip width (group 1), prophylactic steroids (group 2), and prophylactic stents (group 3) in the prevention of post-mucosectomy strictures were studied. Six animals were included in each group. Esophageal mucosal resection was achieved using a novel widespread EMR technique previously described by our group. Animals in group 1 underwent partial (50 % circumference) mucosal resection without prophylactic measures, while animals in the other two groups underwent circumferential mucosal resection. Animals in group 2 received 80 mg of triamcinolone injected directly into the exposed submucosal tissue (20 mg injection in four quadrants). Animals in group 3 received esophageal metal stents coated with small-intestine submucosa (SIS) that were deployed immediately post-resection. Animals were kept alive for 1 month.
Results: Partial and circumferential widespread EMRs were achieved in all animals. There were no procedural complications. Repeat endoscopy at 1 month showed no strictures in group 1. Only four animals were studied in group 2, owing to the high complication rate (periesophageal abscess in all animals) with one early death. Three of the surviving animals developed mild to tight strictures. In group 3, all animals developed tight strictures; however, there was early stent migration in four animals and premature stent removal in two animals because of persistent vomiting.
Conclusions: Partial widespread EMR of the esophagus heals without stricture formation and does not require prophylactic intervention. The use of deep mural steroid injection following a circumferential resection does not appear to prevent strictures and may result in serious adverse events. Short-term use of esophageal stents is inadequate for stricture prevention. However, better results may be anticipated with longer term (at least 6 weeks) stent use.

References

• 1 Rajan E, Gostout C J, Feitoza A B. et al . Widespread endoscopic mucosal resection: a new technique for removing large surface areas of mucosa.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 623-627
• 2 Giovannini M, Bories E, Pesenti C. et al . Circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection in Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or mucosal cancer. Preliminary results in 21 patients.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 782-787
• 3 Seewald S, Akaraviputh T, Seitz U. et al . Circumferential EMR and complete removal of Barrett’s epithelium: a new approach to management of Barrett’s esophagus containing high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and intramucosal carcinoma.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 854-859
• 4 Inoue H. Endoscopic mucosal resection for esophageal and gastric mucosal cancers.  Can J Gastroenterol. 1998;  12 355-359
• 5 Ohmura K, Nagashima R, Takeda H. et al . Temporary stenting with metallic endoprosthesis for refractory esophageal stricture secondary to cylindrical resection of carcinoma.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 214-217
• 6 Seewald S, Omar S, Groth S. et al . A novel multiband mucosectomy device facilitates circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection in Barrett’s esophagus with early malignant changes.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 AB80
• 7 Deprez P H, Aouattah T, Piessevaux H. et al . Can piecemeal mucosectomy completely remove Barrett’s esophagus with high grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 AB129
• 8 Peters F, Kara M, Rosmolen W. et al . Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with high grade dysplasia (HGD) and/or early cancer (EC): stepwise radical endoscopic resection (SRER) for complete removal of BE is safe and effective.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 AB140
• 9 Kamler J P, Borsatto R, Binmoeller K F. Circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection in the swine esophagus assisted by a cap attachment.  Gastrointest Endosc.. 2002;  55 923-928
• 10 Radu A, Grosjean P, Fontolliet C. et al . Endoscopic mucosal resection in the esophagus with a new rigid device: an animal study.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 298-305
• 11 Conio M, Rajan E, Sorbi D. et al . The comparative performance of different solutions used for submucosal injection in the porcine esophagus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 513-516
• 12 Feitoza A, Gostout C, Burgart L. et al . Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose: a better submucosal fluid cushion for endoscopic mucosal resection.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 41-47
• 13 Ell C, May A, Gossner L. et al . Endoscopic mucosal resection of early cancer and high grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 670-677
• 14 Nijhawan P K, Wang K K. Endoscopic mucosal resection for lesions with endoscopic features suggestive of malignancy and high-grade dysplasia within Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 328-332
• 15 May A, Gossner L, Pech O. et al . Local endoscopic therapy for intraepithelial high-grade neoplasia and early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus: acute-phase and intermediate results of a new treatment approach.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;  14 1085-1091