Introduction: The present study compares the subjective responses of patients in the stable phase
of schizophrenia being treated with either olanzapine or risperidone. Methods: Several well-established, self-report inventories were used in this investigation,
providing a means of assessing the impact of these medications from the perspective
of the patient. Results: Patients randomly sampled from a continuing care clinic had been receiving treatment
with olanzapine and risperidone for an average of 140 weeks and 225 weeks, respectively.
The two treatment groups report highly positive attitudes toward their medication
and a relatively high overall level of well-being and health-related quality of life.
All patients report high levels of satisfaction with the mental health services they
receive and their general health status. Olanzapine-treated patients were more likely
to report reduced social and family interaction, as well as reduced sexual behavior
and less participation in active recreational and pastime activities. Patients on
olanzapine also reported greater difficulty in thinking clearly and more feelings
of uselessness and of being lost and alone. The occurrence of antipsychotic-induced
tardive dyskinesia and akathisia was low in both treatment groups. Discussion: Results point to a high level of subjective tolerability for both olanzapine and
risperidone, with few differences between the two medications on the subjective dimensions
of outcome assessed in this study. Future studies should expand on the findings here,
building on the limitations toward a large study including a comparison group receiving
long-term treatment with typical antipsychotics. Ultimately, the goal should be the
incorporation of patient-oriented assessments into routine clinical practice. This
is particularly important given the relationship among satisfaction with treatment,
compliance, and quality of life.
References
1
Al-Zakwani I S, Barron J J, Bullano M F, Arcona S, Drury C J, Cockerham T R.
Analysis of healthcare utilization patterns and adherence in patients receiving typical
and atypical antipsychotic medications.
Curr Med Res Opin.
2003;
19 (7)
619-626
2
Awad A G.
Subjective response to neuroleptics in schizophrenia.
Schizophr Bull.
1993;
19 (3)
609-618
3 Awad A G. Antipsychotic medications in schizophrenia: how satisfied are our patients?.
In: Clear perspectives - management issues in schizophrenia: patient satisfaction,
compliance and outcomes in schizophrenia . London (UK); AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals 1999: 1-6
4
Awad A G, Hogan T P.
Early treatment events and prediction of response to neuroleptics in schizophrenia.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry.
1985;
9
85-588
5
Awad A G, Hogan T P.
Subjective response to neuroleptics and the quality of life: implications for treatment
outcome.
Acta Psychiatr Scand.
1994;
89 (Suppl. 380)
27-32
6
Awad A G, Hogan T P, Voruganti L NP, Heslegrave R J.
Patients’ subjective experiences on antipsychotic medications: implications for outcome
and quality of life.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol.
1995;
10 (Suppl. 3)
123-132
7
Awad A G, Lapierre Y D, Angus C, Rylander A, and The Canadian Remoxipride G roup.
Quality of life and response of negative symptoms in schizophrenia to haloperidol
and the atypical antipsychotic remoxipride.
J Psychiatry Neurosci.
1997;
22 (4)
244-248
8
Awad A G, Voruganti L N.
New antipsychotics, compliance, quality of life, and subjective tolerability - are
patients better off?.
Can J Psychiatry.
2004;
49 (5)
283-284
9
Awad A G, Voruganti L NP, Heslegrave R J.
A conceptual model of quality of life in schizophrenia: description and preliminary
clinical validation.
Qual Life Res.
1997;
6
21-26
10
Barnes T RE.
A rating scale for drug-induced akathisia.
Br J Psychiatry.
1989;
154
672-676
11
Bartko G, Herczeg I, Bekesy M.
Predicting outcome of neuroleptic treatment on the basis of subjective response and
early clinical improvement.
J Clin Psychiatry.
1987;
48
363-365
12
Bergner M, Bobbit R A, Carter W B, Gilson B S.
The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure.
Med Care.
1981;
19 (8)
787-805
13
Csernansky J G, Schuchart E K.
Relapse and rehospitalisation rates in patients with schizophrenia. Effects of second
generation antipsychotics.
CNS Drugs.
2002;
16 (7)
473-484
14
Dolder C R, Jeste D V.
Incidence of tardive dyskinesia with typical versus atypical antipsychotics in very
high risk patients.
Biol Psychiatry.
2003;
53 (12)
142-1145
15
Franz M, Lis K, Pluddemann K, Gallhofer B.
Conventional versus atypical neuroleptics: subjective quality of life in schizophrenic
patients.
Br J Psychiatry.
1997;
170
422-425
16
Glick I D, Berg P H.
Time to study discontinuation, relapse, and compliance with atypical and conventional
antipsychotics in schizophrenia and related disorders.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol.
2002;
17 (2)
65-68
17 Guy W. (editor). AIMS, in ECDEU Assessment Manual. Rockville, MD; U.S. Department
of Health, Education, and Welfare 1976: pp. 534-537
18
Hamilton S H, Revicki D A, Edgel L, Genduso L A, Tollefson G D.
Clinical and economic outcomes of olanzapine compared with haloperidol for schizophrenia
- results from a randomized clinical trial.
Pharmacoeconomics.
1999;
15
469-480
19
Hellewell J S.
Patients’ subjective experiences of antipsychotics: clinical relevance.
CNS Drugs.
2002;
16 (7)
457-471
20
Hertling I, Philipp M, Dvorak A, Glaser T, Mast O, Beneke M, Ramskogler K, Saletu-Zyhlarz G,
Walter H, Lesch O M.
Flupenthixol versus risperidone: subjective quality of life as an important factor
for compliance in chronic schizophrenic patients.
Neuropsychobiology.
2003;
47 (1)
37-46
21
Hogan T P, Awad A G.
Subjective response to neuroleptics and outcome in schizophrenia: a re-examination
comparing two measures.
Psychol Med.
1992;
22
347-352
22
Hogan T P, Awad A G, Eastwood M R.
A self-report scale predictive of drug compliance in schizophrenics: reliability and
discriminative validity.
Psychol Med.
1983;
13
177-183
23
Jacovljevic M, Dossenbach M R, Friedel P, Schausberger B, Grundy S L, Hotujac L, Folnegovic-Smalc V,
Uglesic B, Tollefson G.
Olanzapine versus fluphenazine in the acute (6-week) treatment of schizophrenia.
Psychiatr Danub.
1999;
11
3-11
24
Jarema M, Murawiec S, Szafranski T, Szaniawska A, Konieczynska Z.
Subjective and objective evaluation of treating schizophrenia with classic or atypical
drugs.
Psychiatr Pol.
2001;
35 (1)
5-19
25
Kanter J.
Clinical case management: definition, principles, components.
Hosp Community Psychiatry.
1989;
40
361-368
26
Karagianis J L, LeDrew K K, Walker D J.
Switching treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder
to olanzapine: a one-year open-label study with five-year follow-up.
Curr Med Res Opin.
2003;
19
473-480
27
Karow A, Naber D.
Subjective well-being and quality of life under atypical antipsychotic treatment.
Psychopharmacology.
2002;
162
3-10
28
Kim K, Pae C, Chae J, Bahk W, Jun T, Kim D. et al .
Effects of olanzapine on prolactin levels of female patients with schizophrenia treated
with risperidone.
J Clin Psychiatry.
2002;
63 (5)
408-413
29
Larsen E B, Gerlach J.
Subjective experience of treatment, side-effects, mental state and quality of life
in chronic schizophrenic out-patients treated with depot neuroleptics.
Acta Psychiatr Scand.
1996;
93
381-388
30
Lieberman J A, Tollefson G, Tohen M, Green A I, Gur R E, Kahn R. et al .
Comparative efficacy and safety of atypical and conventional antipsychotic drugs in
first-episode psychosis: a randomized, double-blind trail of olanzapine versus haloperidol.
Am J Psychiatry.
2003;
160 (8)
1396-1404
31
Llorca P M, Chereau I, Bayle F J, Lancon C.
Tardive dyskinesias and antipsychotics: a review.
Eur Psychiatry.
2002;
17
129-138
32
May P RA, Van Putten T, Yale C, Potepan P, Jenden D J, Fairchild M D. et al .
predicting individual response to drug treatment in schizophrenia: a test dose model.
J Ner Ment Dis.
1976;
162 (3)
177-183
33 McGrath B M, Tempier R P. Cross-sectional analysis of medication prescriptions
for a continuing care patient population using the psychiatry quality measurement. Presented
at the 9th Congress of the International Federation of Psychiatric Epidemiology Edmonton,
Alberta, Canada; May 2002
34
McGrath B M, Tempier R P.
Implementing quality management in psychiatry: from theory to practice - shifting
focus from process to outcome.
Can J Psychiatry.
2003;
48 (7)
467-474
35
Moritz S, Woodward T S, Krausz M, Naber D, and the PERSIST Study G roup.
Relationship between neuroleptic dosage and subjective cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenic
patients treated with either conventional or atypical neuroleptic medication.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol.
2002;
17
41-44
36
Naber D.
A self-rating to measure subjective effects of neuroleptic drugs, relationships to
objective psychopathology, quality of life, compliance and other clinical variables.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol.
1995;
10 (Suppl. 3)
133-138
37
Naber D, Moritz S, Lambert M, Pajonk F, Holzbach R, Mass R. et al .
Improvement of schizophrenic patients’ subjective well-being under atypical antipsychotic
drugs.
Schizophr Res.
2001;
50
79-88
38 Naber D, Walther A, Kircher T, Hayek D, Holzbach R. Subjective effects of neuroleptic
predict compliance. In Gaebel W, Ward AG, editors
Prediction of neuroleptic treatment outcome in schizophrenia: concepts and methods . Vienna; Springer-Verlag 1994: pp. 85-98
39
Patel N C, Dorson P G, Edwards N, Mendelson S, Crismon M L.
One-year rehospitalization rates of patients discharged on atypical versus conventional
antipsychotics.
Psychiatr Serv.
2002;
53 (7)
891-893
40
Pereira S, Pinto R.
A survey of the attitudes of chronic psychiatric patients living in the community
toward their medication.
Acta Psychiatr Scand.
1997;
95
464-468
41 Puri B K. SPSS in practice: an illustrated guide. 2nd Edition New York; Oxford
University Press, Inc 2002: pp. 1-175
42
Rabinowitz J, Bromet E J, Davidson M.
Short report: comparison of patient satisfaction and burden of adverse effects with
novel and conventional neuroleptics: a naturalistic study.
Schizophr Bull.
2001;
27 (4)
597-600
43
Ritsner M, Perelroyzen G, Ilan H, Gibel A.
Subjective response to antipsychotics of schizophrenia patients treated in routine
clinical practice: a naturalistic comparative study.
J Clin Psychopharmacol.
2004;
24 (3)
245-254
44
Sacristan J A, Gomez J C, Montejo A L, Vieta E, Gregor K J, and the EFESO Study G roup.
Doses of olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol used in clinical practice: results
of a prospective pharmacoepidemiologic study.
Clin Ther.
2000;
22 (5)
583-599
45
Sarwer-Foner G J.
The role of neuroleptic medication in psychotherapeutic interaction.
Compr Psychiatry.
1960;
1
291-300
46
Sarwer-Foner G J.
On the mechanisms of action of neuroleptic drugs: a theoretical psychodynamic explanation.
Recent Adv Biol Psychiatry.
1963;
6
217-232
47
Schillevoort I, de Boer A, Herings R MC, Roos R AC.
Risk of extrapyramidal syndromes with haloperidol, risperidone, or olanzapine.
Ann Pharmacother.
2001;
35
1517-1522
48 Stokes M E, Davis C S, Koch G G. Categorical data analysis using The SAS System. 2nd
Edition North Carolina; SAS Institute 2000: pp. 626
49
Strauss J S.
Subjective experiences of schizophrenia: toward a new dynamic psychiatry-II.
Schizophr Bull.
1989;
15 (2)
177-187
50
Tempier R.
Quality of life and schizophrenia: the impact of novel antipsychotic medications.
Can Psychiatr Assoc Bull.
1999;
31 (5)
144-146
51 Tomb D A. Psychiatry. 6th edition Philadelphia; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 1999:
pp. 19-39
52
Van Putten T, May P RA.
Subjective response as a predictor of outcome in pharmacotherapy.
Arch Gen Psychiatry.
1978;
35
447-480
53
Van Putten T, May P RA, Marder S R.
Subjective responses to thiothixene and chlorpromazine.
Psychopharmacol Bull.
1980;
16 (3)
36-38
54
Van Putten T, May P RA, Marder S R.
Response to antipsychotic medication: the doctor’s and the consumer’s view.
Am J Psychiatry.
1984;
141 (1)
16-19
55
Van Putten T, May P RA, Marder S R, Wittmann L A.
Subjective response to antipsychotic drugs.
Arch Gen Psychiatry.
1981;
38
187-190
56
Volavka J, Czobor P, Sheitman B, Lindenmayer J P, Citrome L, McEvoy J P. et al .
Clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol in the treatment of patients with
chronic schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.
Am J Psychiatry.
2002;
159
255-262
57
Voruganti L, Awad A G.
Neuroleptic dysphoria: towards a new synthesis.
Psychopharmacol.
2004;
171
121-132
58
Voruganti L NP, Cortese L, Oyewumi L, Cernovsky Z, Zirul S, Awad A.
Comparative evaluation of conventional and novel antipsychotic drugs with reference
to their subjective tolerability, side-effect profile and impact on quality of life.
Schizophr Res.
2000;
43
135-145
59
Watanabe A, Shibata I, Kato T.
Differences of satisfaction with medication between patients with schizophrenia treated
with typical antipsychotics and atypical antipsychotics.
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci.
2004;
58
268-273
60
Weiden P, Aquila R, Standard J.
Atypical antipsychotic drugs and long-term outcome in schizophrenia.
J Clin Psychiatry.
1996;
57 (Suppl. 11)
53-60
61
Williams B.
Patient satisfaction: a valid concept?.
Soc Sci Med.
1994;
38 (4)
509-516
62
Windgassen K.
Treatment with neuroleptics: the patient’s perspective.
Acta Psychiatr Scand.
1992;
86
405-410
63
Woods S W.
Chlorpromazine equivalent doses for the newer atypical antipsychotics.
J Clin Psychiatry.
2003;
64 (6)
663-667
64
Ziegler D M, Peachey T J.
A study of treatment outcomes from atypical antipsychotic medications in the Virginia
public system of community care.
Community Ment Health J.
2003;
39 (2)
169-182
Brent M. McGrath, BSc, MSc
Department of Psychiatry
University of Alberta, Mackenzie Centre
8440 - 112 Street
Edmonton
Alberta
Canada
T6G 2B7
Phone: 780-492-6028
Fax: 780-407-6672
Email: brent.mcgrath@ualberta.ca