Literatur
- 1
Hannah
M
E
Hannah
W
J
Hewson
S
A
Hodnett
E
D
Saigal
S
Willan
A
R
for the Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group
.
Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at
term: a randomised multicentre trial.
Lancet.
2000;
356
1375-1383
- 2
Feige A.
Eine Antwort auf die Hannah-Studie.
Geburtsh Frauenheilk.
2002;
62
500-504
- 3
Giuliani A, Schöll W MJ, Basver A, Tamussino K F.
Mode of delivery and outcome of 699 singleton breech deliveries at a single center.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2002;
187
1694-1698
- 4
Golfier F, Vaudoyer F, Ecochard R, Champion F, Audra P, Raudrant D.
Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section in singleton term breech
presentation: a study of 1116 cases.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.
2001;
98
(2)
186-192
- 5
Holge K L, Kilburn L, Hewson S, Gafni A, Wall R, Hannah M E.
Impact of the international term breech trial on clinical practice and concerns: a
survey of centre collaborators.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can.
2003;
25
(1)
14-16
- 6
Kayem G, Goffinet F, Clement D, Hessabi M, Cabrol D.
Breech presentation at term: morbidity and mortality according to the type of delivery
at Port Royal Maternity hospital from 1993 through 1999.
Eur J Gynecol Reprod Biol.
2002;
102
(2)
137-142
- 7
Kolâs T, Hofoss D, Daltveit A K, Nilsen S T, Henriksen T, Häger R, Ingemarsson I,
Oian P.
Indications for cesarean deliveries in Norway.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2003;
188
864-870
- 8
Sanches-Ramos L, Wells T L, Adair C D, Arcelin G, Kaunitz A M, Wells D S.
Route of breech delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet.
2001;
73
(1)
7-14
- 9
Shennan A, Bewley S.
How to manage term breech deliveries.
BMJ.
2001;
323
244-245
- 10
Keirse M JNC.
Evidence-based childbirth only for breech babies?.
Birth.
2002;
29
55-59
- 11
Kotaska A.
Inappropriate use of randomisation trials to evaluate complex phenomena: case study
of vaginal breech delivery.
BMJ.
2004;
329
1039-1042
- 12
Krause M, Feige A.
Beckenendlage.
gynäkol. prax..
2002;
26
437-443
- 13
Krause M, Feige A.
Beckenendlage: Ist die Sectio wirklich der bessere Entbin- dungsmodus?.
Frauenarzt.
2001;
42
746-749
- 14
Krause M.
Quo vadis Geburtshilfe?.
Frauenarzt.
2002;
43
(5)
572-574
- 15
Krause M, Feige A.
Beckenendlagengeburtshilfe in Deutschland - eine Bestandsaufnahme.
Therap Umschau.
2002;
59
(12)
677-681
- 16
Krause M.
Kommentar zur neuen BEL-Studie: geplante Sectio oder vaginale Entbindung.
Die Hebamme.
2001;
14
11-13
- 17
ACOG committee opinion .
Mode of term singleton breech delivery. Number 265, December 2001. American College
of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet.
2002;
77
(1)
65-66
- 18 RCOG-Guidelines: Clinical Green Top Guidelines: The Management of Breech Presentation.
- 19
Hofmeyr G J, Hannah M E.
Planned Caesarean section for term breech delivery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2001;
(1)
CD 000166
- 20 Bayerische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Qualitätssicherung in der stationären Betreuung
.Qualitätsbericht Geburtshilfe, Jahresauswertungen 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003
- 21
Whyte H, et al. for the 2-year infant follow-up Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group.
Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal
birth for breech presentation at term: The International Randomized Term Breech Trial.
Am Obstet Gynecol.
2004;
191
864-871
- 22 Wolke D, Söhne B, Schulz J, Ohrt B, Riegel K. Die kindliche Entwicklung nach vaginaler
und abdominaler Entbindung bei Beckenendlage. In: Beckenendlage Urban & Schwarzenberg
Feige, A, Krause, M 1998: S.186-206
- 23
Alarab M, Regan C, O’Connell M P, Keane D P, O’Herlihy C, Foley M E.
Singleton Vaginal Breech Delivery at Term: Still a Safe Option.
Obstet Gynecol.
2004;
103
(3)
407-412
- 24
Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Reigstad H, Markestad T, Irgens L M, Dalaker K.
Evaluation of a protocol for selecting fetuses in breech presentation for vaginal
delivery or cesarean section.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1997;
177
586-592
- 25
Büscher U, Dudenhausen J W.
Lagen-anomalien des Fetus in der Schwanger-schaft: Beckenendlage.
Gynäkologe.
2002;
35
69-80
- 26
Danielian P J, Wang J, Hall M H.
Long term outcome by method of delivery of fetuses in breech presentation at term:
population based follow up.
BMJ.
1996;
312
1451-1453
- 27
de Leeuw J P, de Haan J, Derom R, Thiery M, van Maele G, Martens G.
Indications for caesarean section in breech presentation.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.
1998;
79
(2)
131-137
- 28 Feige A, Krause M. Beckenendlage. Urban & Schwarzenberg 1998
- 29
Irion O, Hirsbrunner Almagbaly P, Morabia A.
Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section: a study of 705 singleton
term breech presentation.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
1998;
105
(7)
710-717
- 30
Ismail M A, Nagib N, Ismail T, Cibils L A.
Comparison of vaginal and caesarean section delivery for fetuses in breech presentation.
J Perinat Med.
1999;
27
(5)
339-351
- 31
Krebs L, Langhoff-Roos J, Thorngren-Jerneck K.
Long-term outcome in term breech infants with low Apgar score - a population-based
follow-up.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.
2001;
100
(1)
5-8
- 32
Krebs L, Topp M, Langhoff-Roos J.
The relation of breech presentation at term to cerebral palsy.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
1999;
106
(9)
943-947
- 33
Munstedt K, von Georgi R, Reucher S, Zygmunt M, Lang U.
Term breech and long-term morbidity - caesarean section versus vaginal breech delivery.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.
2001;
96
(2)
163-167
- 34
Queenan J T.
Teaching Infrequently Used Skills: Vaginal Breech Delivery.
Obstet Gynecol.
2004;
103
(3)
405-406
- 35
Wolf H, Schaap A H, Bruinse H W, Smolders-de Haas H, van Ertbruggen I, Treffers P E.
Vaginal delivery compared with caesarean section in early preterm breech delivery:
a comparison of long term outcome.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
1999;
106
(5)
486-491
- 36
Berg D, Selbmann H K, Süß J, Galecki.
Neonatale Mortalität bei Geburt aus Beckenendlage.
TW Gynäkologie.
1994;
- 37
Gilbert W M, Hicks S M, Boe N M, Danielsen B.
Vaginal Versus Cesarean Delivery for Breech Presentation in California: A Population-Based
Study.
Obstet Gynecol.
2003;
102
(5)
911-917
- 38
Kitschke H J, Misselwitz B, Lieb E.
Die Sectio caesarea in Hessen.
Gynäkologe.
2001;
34
99-101
- 39
Kühnert M, Schmidt S, Feller A, Vonderheit K H.
Sectio caesarea: ein harmloser Eingriff aus mütterlicher Sicht?.
Geburtsh Frauenheilk.
2000;
60
354-361
- 40 Vetter K. Sectio caesarea - Risiken für die nachfolgende Schwangerschaft. In: Huch,
A; Chaoui, R; Huch, R: Sectio caesarea Uni-Med Bremen 2001: 60-66
- 41 Welsch H. Wunschsectio als Normal-geburt der Zukunft?. Vortrag auf dem 10. Kongress
der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pränatal- u. Geburtsmedizin Hamburg; 11.05.2002
- 42
Smith G CS, Pell J P, Dobbie R.
Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy.
Lancet.
2003;
362
1779-1784
- 43
Hannah M E, et al. for the 2-year maternal follow-up Term Breech Trial Colla-borative
Group.
Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal
birth for breech presentation at term: The international randomized Term Breech Trial.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2004;
191
917-927
- 44
Hannah M E, et al. for the Term breech Trial 3-Month Follow-up Collaborative Group.
Outcomes at 3 Month after planned caesarean vs. planned vaginal delivery for breech
presentation at term.
JAMA.
2002;
287
(14)
1822-1831
- 45 Qualitätsbericht 2002, Außerklinische Geburtshilfe in Deutschland. Im Auftrag der
»Gesellschaft für Qualität in der außerklinischen Geburtshilfe e. V.« (QUAG e. V.)
Dr. med. Michael Krause
Leitender OA Frauenklinik
Klinikum Nürnberg Süd
Breslauer Str. 201, 90471 Nürnberg
Email: michael.krause@klinikum-nuernberg.de
