Endovascular Treatment of Small Intracranial Aneurysms: Three Alternatives to Coil Occlusion

Abstract

Introduction: Small intracranial aneurysms with a fundus diameter of 2 - 3 mm may rupture and are therefore potential targets for an endovascular approach in treatment. Currently available coil technology is less than optimal for the treatment of aneurysms within this size range. Even the smallest coils are sometimes too large. If such a minute coil can be introduced into a small aneurysm, the hemodynamic effect and the induced thrombosis are frequently inadequate to occlude the aneurysm sufficiently from the parent artery circulation. Methods: Three technical alternatives for the endovascular treatment of small intracranial aneurysms not suitable for coil occlusion are illustrated with the following three case descriptions. Results: Stent grafts are usable for the intracranial internal carotid artery and for the V4 segment. The stiffness of the stent and the high expansion pressures are the two major drawbacks. Coaxial deployment of two or more self-expanding porous stents can result in sufficient redirection of the blood flow to induce aneurysmal thrombosis. Deployment of multiple stents, however, may require several treatment sessions in order to allow for the integration of the stents into the vessel wall from session to session. A regular microcatheter can block aneurysmal inflow in aneurysms with a very narrow neck. This allows the occlusion of the aneurysm with an appropriate amount of highly concentrated, rapidly polymerizing glue. Polymer emboli may result from excessive or rapid glue injection. Conclusion: The available coil technology has inherent limitations in the treatment of very small intracranial aneurysms. Liquid embolic agents and stent-based extrasaccular treatment strategies may provide solutions for these challenging lesions.

Aneurysm - endovascular - embolization - coil - stent - stent graft - neuroform - histoacryl - NBCA

References

• 1 Johnson S C, Higashida R T, Barrow D L, Caplan L R, Dion J E, Hademenos G, Hopkins L N, Molyneux A, Rosenwasser R H, Vinuela F, Wilson C B. Committee on Cerebrovascular Imaging of the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Radiology: Recommendations for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Cerebrovascular Imaging of the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Radiology.  Stroke. 2002;  33 2536-2544
• 2 Wiebers D O, Whisnant J P, Huston J, Meissner I, Brown R D, Piepgras D G, Forbes G S, Thielen K, Nichols D, O'Fallon W M, Peacock J, Jaeger L, Kassell N F, Kongable-Beckman G L, Torner J C. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment.  Lancet. 2003;  362 103-110
• 3 Felber S, Henkes H, Weber W, Miloslavski E, Brew S, Kühne D. Treatment of extra- and intracranial aneurysms and arterio-venous fistulas using stent grafts.  Neurosurgery. 2004;  55 631-639
• 4 Henkes H, Bose A, Felber S, Miloslavski E, Berg-Dammer E, Kühne D. Endovascular coil occlusion of intracranial aneurysms assisted by a novel self-expandable nitinol microstent (Neuroform).  Interv Neuroradiol. 2002;  8 107-119
• 5 Lieber B B, Stancampiano A P, Wakhloo A K. Alteration of hemodynamics in aneurysm models by stenting: influence of stent porosity.  Ann Biomed Eng. 1997;  25 460-469
• 6 Rhee K, Han M H, Cha S H. Changes of flow characteristics by stenting in aneurysm models: influence of aneurysm geometry and stent porosity.  Ann Biomed Eng. 2002;  30 894-904
• 7 Fiorella D, Albuquerque F C, Deshmukh V R, McDougall C G. In-stent stenosis as a delayed complication of neuroform stent-supported coil embolization of an incidental carotid terminus aneurysm.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;  25 1764-1767
• 8 Lopes D, Sani S. Histological postmortem study of an internal carotid artery aneurysm treated with the Neuroform stent.  Neurosurgery. 2005;  56 416
• 9 Teng M M, Chen C C, Lirng J F, Chen S S, Lee L S, Chang T. n-Butyl 2-cyanoacrylate for embolization of carotid aneurysm.  Neuroradiology. 1994;  36 144-147
• 10 Macdonald R L, Mojtahedi S, Johns L, Kowalczuk A. Randomized comparison of Guglielmi detachable coils and cellulose acetate polymer for treatment of aneurysm in dogs.  Stroke. 1998;  29 478-485
• 11 Szikora I, Guterman L R, Standard S C, Wakhloo A K, Hopkins L N. Endovascular treatment of experimental aneurysms with liquid polymers: the protective potential of stents.  Neurosurgery. 1996;  38 339-347
• 12 Yang X, Wu Z, Li Y, Sun Y, Yin K. Comparison of cellulose acetate polymer and electrolytic detachable coils for treatment of canine aneurysmal models.  Chin Med Sci J. 2002;  17 47-51
• 13 Molyneux A J, Cekirge S, Saatci I, Gal G. Cerebral Aneurysm Multicenter European Onyx (CAMEO) trial: results of a prospective observational study in 20 European centers.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;  25 39-51
• 14 Magoufis G L, Vrachliotis T G, Stringaris K A. Covered stents to treat partial recanalization of Onyx-occluded giant intracavernous carotid aneurysm.  J Endovasc Ther. 2004;  11 742-746
• 15 Saatci I, Cekirge H S, Ciceri E F, Mawad M E, Pamuk A G, Besim A. CT and MR imaging findings and their implications in the follow-up of patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with endosaccular occlusion with Onyx.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;  24 567-578
• 16 Gounis M J, Lieber B B, Wakhloo A K, Siekmann R, Hopkins L N. Effect of glacial acetic acid and ethiodized oil concentration on embolization with n-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate: an in vivo investigation.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;  23 938-944
• 17 Hashimoto T, Young W L, Aagaard B D, Joshi S, Ostapkovich N D, Pile-Spellman J. Adenosine-induced ventricular asystole to induce transient profound systemic hypotension in patients undergoing endovascular therapy. Dose-response characteristics.  Anesthesiology. 2000;  93 998-1001
• 18 Sorteberg A, Sorteberg W, Rappe A, Strother C M. Effect of Guglielmi detachable coils on intraaneurysmal flow: experimental study in canines.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;  23 288-294