Neuro-Ophthalmologic Manifestations of Psychogenic Disease

ABSTRACT

From a neuro-ophthalmologic standpoint, five areas may be affected by psychogenic disease: (1) vision, including visual acuity and visual field; (2) ocular motility and alignment; (3) pupillary size and reactivity; (4) eyelid position and function; and (5) corneal and facial sensation. The physician faced with a patient complaining of decreased vision or some other disturbance related to the afferent or efferent visual systems for which there is no apparent biologic explanation has three responsibilities. First, the physician must ascertain that an organic disorder is not present. Second, the physician should induce the patient to see or do something that would not be possible if the condition were organic in nature. Finally, the physician should attempt to determine whether the patient has an underlying psychiatric disease or is experiencing psychosocial stress. In this article, manifestations of psychogenic disease as they pertain to vision are considered, and, where appropriate, the various methods used to diagnose and treat these phenomena are discussed.

KEYWORDS

Visual loss - visual field constriction - nonorganic - dilated pupil - spasm of near reflex - ptosis - blepharospasm

REFERENCES

• 1 Yamade S, Kono M, Hukami K. Color vision in psychogenic visual disturbance.  Folia Ophthalmol Jpn. 1989;  40 1674-1680
• 2 Weller M, Wiedemann P. Hysterical symptoms in ophthalmology.  Doc Ophthalmol. 1989;  73 1-33
• 3 Newman N J. Neuro-ophthalmology and psychiatry.  Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1993;  15 102-114
• 4 Scott J A, Egan R A. Prevalence of organic neuro-ophthalmologic disease in patients with functional visual loss.  Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;  135 670-675
• 5 Clarke W N, Noël L P, Bariciak M. Functional visual loss in children: a common problem with an easy solution.  Can J Ophthalmol. 1996;  31 311-313
• 6 Taich A, Crowe S, Kosmorsky G S, Traboulsi E I. Prevalence of psychosocial disturbances in children with nonorganic visual loss.  J AAPOS. 2004;  8 457-461
• 7 Kathol R G, Cox T A, Corbett J J et al.. Functional visual loss: follow-up of 42 cases.  Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;  101 729-735
• 8 Keltner J L, May W N, Johnson C A et al.. The California syndrome: functional visual complaints with potential economic impact.  Ophthalmology. 1985;  92 427-435
• 9 Mouriaux F, Defoort-Dhellemmes S, Kochman F et al.. Le pithiatisme oculaire chez l'enfant et l'adolescent.  J Fr Ophtalmol. 1997;  20 175-182
• 10 Langmann A, Lindner S, Kriechbaum N. Funktionelle Sehstauorung als Konversionssymptom im Kindes-und jugendalter.  Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2001;  218 677-681
• 11 Trauzettel-Klosinski S. Untersuchungsstrategien bei Simulation und funkionellen Sehstauorungen.  Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1997;  211 73-83
• 12 Bienfang D C, Kurtz D. Management of functional visual loss.  J Am Optom Assoc. 1998;  69 12-21
• 13 Rieken H. Die Spiegelraumbewegung, eine neue Untersuchungsmethode auf der Grundlage eines “psycho-optischen” reflexes.  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Ophthalmol. 1943;  145 432-453
• 14 Kramer K K, La Piana F G, Appleton B. Ocular malingering and hysteria: diagnosis and management.  Surv Ophthalmol. 1979;  24 89-96
• 15 Thompson H S. Functional visual loss.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;  100 209-213
• 16 Tsutsui J, Karino T, Kimura H et al.. Evaluation of vision tests in the diagnosis of malingering.  Folia Ophthalmol Jpn. 1985;  36 1159-1164
• 17 Miller N R. Neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations of nonorganic disease. In: Miller NR, Newman NJ, Biousse V, Kerrison JB Walsh and Hoyt's Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology. 6th ed. Vol. 1. Baltimore; Williams & Wilkins 2005: 1315-1334
• 18 Levy N S, Glick E B. Stereoscopic perception and Snellen visual acuity.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1974;  78 722-724
• 19 Donzis P B, Rappazzo J A, Burde R M et al.. Effect of binocular variations of Snellen's visual acuity on Titmus stereoacuity.  Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;  101 930-932
• 20 Nakamura A, Akio T, Matsuda E et al.. Pattern visual evoked potentials in malingering.  J Neuroophthalmol. 2001;  21 42-45
• 21 Xu S, Meyer D, Yoser S et al.. Pattern visual evoked potential in the diagnosis of functional visual loss.  Ophthalmology. 2001;  108 76-81
• 22 Thompson J C, Kosmorsky G S, Ellis B D. Fields of dreamers and dreamed-up fields: functional and fake perimetry.  Ophthalmology. 1996;  103 117-125
• 23 Ohkubo H. Visual field in hysteria-reliability of visual field by Goldmann perimetry.  Doc Ophthalmol. 1989;  71 61-67
• 24 Lincoff H A. Bilateral central scotomas of hysterical origin.  Arch Ophthalmol. 1959;  62 273-279
• 25 Gittinger Jr J W. Functional hemianopsia: a historical perspective.  Surv Ophthalmol. 1988;  32 427-432
• 26 Fish R H, Kline L B, Hanumanthu V K et al.. Hysterical bitemporal hemianopia “cured” with contact lenses.  J Clin Neuroophthalmol. 1990;  10 76-78
• 27 Pilley S FJ, Thompson H S. Binasal field loss and prefixation blindness. In: Glaser JS, Smith JL Neuro-Ophthalmology Symposium of the University of Miami and the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute. Vol. 8. St Louis; CV Mosby 1975: 277-284
• 28 Garvey J L. Hysteric homonymous hemianopia.  Am J Ophthalmol. 1922;  5 721-722
• 29 Massicotte E C, Semela L, Hedges III T R. Multifocal visual evoked potential in nonorganic visual field loss.  Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;  123 364-367
• 30 Catalono R A, Simon J W, Krohel G B et al.. Functional visual loss in children.  Ophthalmology. 1986;  93 385-390
• 31 Stark L, Hoyt W F, Ciuffreda K J et al.. Voluntary nystagmus consists of overlapping and truncated saccades: an oculographic and control systems analysis. In: Zuber BL Models of Oculomotor Behavior and Control. Boca Raton, FL; CRC Press 1981: 75-89
• 32 Zahn J R. Incidence and characterization of voluntary nystagmus.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1978;  41 617-623
• 33 Shults W T, Stark L, Hoyt W F et al.. Normal saccadic structure of voluntary nystagmus.  Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;  95 1399-1404
• 34 Stark L, Shults W T, Ciuffreda K J et al.. Voluntary nystagmus is saccadic: evidence from motor and sensory mechanisms.  In: Proceedings of the Joint Automatic Control Conference, San Francisco. Pittsburgh; Instrument Society of America 1977: 1410-1414
• 35 Krohel G, Griffin J F. Voluntary vertical nystagmus.  Neurology. 1979;  29 1153-1154
• 36 Blair C J, Goldberg M F, von Noorden G K. Voluntary nystagmus.  Arch Ophthalmol. 1967;  77 349-354
• 37 Ciuffreda K J. Voluntary nystagmus: new findings and clinical implications.  Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980;  57 795-800
• 38 Keane J R. Neuro-ophthalmologic signs and symptoms of hysteria.  Neurology. 1982;  32 757-762
• 39 Sarkies N JC, Sanders M D. Convergence spasm.  Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1985;  104 782-786
• 40 Rosenberg M L. Spasm of the near reflex mimicking myasthenia gravis.  J Clin Neuroophthalmol. 1986;  6 106-108
• 41 Manor R S. Use of special glasses in treatment of spasm of near reflex.  Ann Ophthalmol. 1979;  11 903-905
• 42 Loewenfeld I E. The Pupil: Anatomy, Physiology, and Clinical Applications. Vol. I. Ames, IA; Iowa State University Press 1993
• 43 Bumke O. Die Pupillenstörungen in Geisteskranken. Vienna; Fischer Verlag 1904
• 44 Westphal A. Über Bisher nicht beschriebene Pupillenerscheinungen in Katatonischen Stupor mit Krankendemonstrationen.  Allg Z Psychiatr. 1907;  64 694-701
• 45 Westphal A. Über ein im Katatonischen Stupor beiobachtestes Pupillenphaenomen sowie bemerkungen über die pupillenstarre bei hysterie.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1907;  33 1080-1085
• 46 Tyrer J H, Sutherland J M, Eadie M J. Myosis bilatéral dans les déviations volontaires des yeux dans toutes les directions, dans un syndrome de neuromyélite optique.  Rev Neurol. 1963;  109 72-76
• 47 Thompson H S, Newsom D A, Loewenfeld I E. The fixed dilated pupil: sudden iridoplegia or mydriatic drops? A simple diagnostic test.  Arch Ophthalmol. 1971;  86 21-27
• 48 Cavenar J, Brantley I J, Braasch E. Blepharospasm: organic or functional?.  Psychosomatics. 1978;  19 623-628
• 49 Walsh F B, Hoyt W F. Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology. 3rd ed. Vol. 3. Baltimore; Williams & Wilkins 1969: 2530