Zusammenfassung
Neben dem Gleitwiderstand spielen bei der Auswahl der jeweiligen kieferorthopädischen
Apparatur noch andere Faktoren, wie etwa die geplante Kraftstärke, ästhetische Überlegungen
oder der Tragekomfort des Gerätes eine Rolle. Jeder von uns legt bei einem Fahrzeug
Wert auf unterschiedliche Merkmale und in ähnlicher Weise kann es nicht nur eine einzige
„ideale” Apparatur geben. Dieser Artikel soll dazu beitragen, einzelne Aspekte, wie
das Gleitverhalten der verwendeten Brackets, Bogendrähte und Ligaturverfahren richtig
zu gewichten und somit Behandlungsmaßnahmen entsprechend zu optimieren.
Abstract
Factors other than resistance to sliding (for example, desired force level, aesthetics,
or patient comfort) should also influence the choice of appliance. Much like we have
our own preferences in a car, we may not agree on a single “ideal” appliance. This
article shall contribute to a better understanding of the frictional behavior of brackets,
archwires, and ligation methods and help to optimize treatment.
Schlüsselwörter
Friktion - Gleitwiderstand
Key words
friction - resistance to sliding
Literatur
- 1 Haney P. Rubber Friction. Sports Car 2004; January
- 2
Frank C A, Nikolai R J.
A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch
wire.
Am J Orthod.
1980;
78
593-609
- 3
Kusy R P, Whitley J Q.
Friction between different wire-bracket configurations and materials.
Semin Orthod.
1997;
3
166-177
- 4 Jastrzebski Z D. The Nature of Properties of Engineering Materials. John Wiley &
Sons Inc., New York 1976
- 5 Persson B NJ. Sliding Friction: Physical Principles and Applications. Springer,
New York, Berlin 1998
- 6
Kusy R P, Whitley J Q.
Effects of surface roughness on the coefficients of friction in model orthodontic
systems.
J Biomech.
1990;
23
913-925
- 7
Kusy R P, Whitley J Q.
Influence of archwire and bracket dimensions on sliding mechanics: derivations and
determinations of the critical contact angles for binding.
Eur J Orthod.
1999;
21
199-208
- 8
Kusy R P, Whitley J Q.
Resistance to sliding of orthodontic appliances in the dry and wet states: influence
of archwire alloy, interbracket distance, and bracket engagement.
J Biomed Mater Res.
2000;
52
797-811
- 9
Articolo L C, Kusy K, Saunders C R, Kusy R P.
Influence of ceramic and stainless steel brackets on the notching of archwires during
clinical treatment.
Eur J Orthod.
2000;
22
409-425
- 10
Thorstenson G A, Kusy R P.
Influence of stainless steel inserts on the resistance to sliding of esthetic brackets
with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.
Angle Orthod.
2003;
73
167-175
- 11
McKamey R P, Kusy R P.
Stress-relaxing composite ligature wires: formulations and characteristics.
Angle Orthod.
1999;
69
441-449
- 12
Thorstenson G A, Kusy R P.
Effects of ligation type and method on the resistance to sliding of novel orthodontic
brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.
Angle Orthod.
2003;
73
418-430
- 13
Iwasaki L R, Beatty M W, Randall C J, Nickel J C.
Clinical ligation forces and intraoral friction during sliding on a stainless steel
archwire.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2003;
123
408-415
- 14
Meling T R, Odegaard J, Holthe K, Segner D.
The effect of friction on the bending stiffness of orthodontic beams: a theoretical
and in vitro study.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
1997;
112
41-49
- 15
Kusy R P.
Orthodontic biomechanics: vistas from the top of a new century.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2000;
117
589-591
- 16
Schumacher H A, Bourauel C, Drescher D.
The effect of the ligature on the friction between bracket and arch.
Fortschr Kieferorthop.
1990;
51
106-116
- 17
Schumacher H A, Bourauel C, Drescher D.
The influence of bracket design on frictional losses in the bracket / arch wire system.
J Orofac Orthop.
1999;
60
335-347
- 18
Tidy D C.
Frictional forces in fixed appliances.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
1989;
96
249-254
- 19
Edwards G D, Davies E H, Jones S P.
The ex vivo effect of ligation technique on the static frictional resistance of stainless
steel brackets and archwires.
Br J Orthod.
1995;
22
145-153
- 20
Zufall S W, Kusy R P.
Sliding mechanics of coated composite wires and the development of an engineering
model for binding.
Angle Orthod.
2000;
70
34-47
- 21
Stevenson J S, Kusy R P.
Force application and decay characteristics of untreated and treated polyurethane
elastomeric chains.
Angle Orthod.
1994;
64
455-467
- 22
Dowling P A, Jones W B, Lagerstrom L, Sandham J A.
An investigation into the behavioural characteristics of orthodontic elastomeric modules.
Br J Orthod.
1998;
25
197-202
- 23
Baccetti T, Franchi L.
Friction produced by types of elastomeric ligatures in treatment mechanics with the
preadjusted appliance.
Angle Orthod.
2006;
76
211-216
- 24
Chimenti C, Franchi L, Di Giuseppe M G, Lucci M.
Friction of orthodontic elastomeric ligatures with different dimensions.
Angle Orthod.
2005;
75
421-425
- 25
Khambay B, Millet D, McHugh S.
Archwire seating forces produced by different ligation methods and their effect on
frictional resistance.
Eur J Orthod.
2005;
27
302-308
- 26
Damon D H.
The rationale, evolution, and clinical application of the self-ligating bracket.
Clin Orthod Res.
1998;
1
52-61
- 27
Voudouris J C.
Interactive edgewise mechanisms: form and function comparison with conventional edgewise
brackets.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
1997;
111
119-140
- 28
Thorstenson G A, Kusy R P.
Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating
brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2002;
122
295-305
- 29 Dowling N E. Mechanical Behavior of Materials. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
NJ 1993
- 30
Hiromoto S, Mischler S.
The influence of proteins on the fretting-corrosion behavior of a Ti6Al4V alloy.
Wear.
2006;
261
1002-1011
- 31
Park J H, Lee Y K, Lim B S, Kim C W.
Frictional forces between lingual brackets and archwires measured by a friction tester.
Angle Orthod.
2004;
74
816-824
- 32
Moore J C, Waters N E.
Factors affecting tooth movement in sliding mechanics.
Eur J Orthod.
1993;
15
235-241
- 33
Thorstenson G A, Kusy R P.
Resistance to sliding of orthodontic brackets with bumps in the slot floors and walls:
effects of second-order angulation.
Dent Mater.
2004;
20
881-892
- 34
Hansen J D, Kusy R P, Saunders C R.
Archwire damage from ceramic brackets via notching.
Orthod Rev.
1997;
11
27-31
- 35
Kapila S, Sachdeva R.
Mechanical properties and clinical applications of orthodontic wires.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
1989;
96
100-109
- 36
Meling T R, Odegaard J.
The effect of short-term temperature changes on superelastic nickel-titanium archwires
activated in orthodontic bending.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2001;
119
263-273
- 37
Kusy R P, Whitley J Q.
Influence of fluid media on the frictional coefficients in orthodontic sliding.
Semin Orthod.
2003;
9
281-289
- 38
Kusy R P, Schafer D L.
Effect of salivary viscosity on frictional coefficients of orthodontic archwire /
bracket couples.
J Mater Sci Mater Med.
1995;
6
390-395
- 39
Vaughan J L, Duncanson MG J r, Nanda R S, Currier G F.
Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and orthodontic
wires.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
1995;
107
20-27
- 40
Kusy R P, Whitley J Q, Ambrose W W, Newman J G.
Evaluation of titanium brackets for orthodontic treatment: Part I. The passive configuration.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
1998;
114
558-572
- 41
Kusy R P, O'Grady P W.
Evaluation of titanium brackets for orthodontic treatment: Part II. The active configuration.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2000;
118
675-684
- 42
Drescher D, Bourauel C, Schumacher H A.
Frictional forces between bracket and arch wire.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
1989;
96
397-404
- 43
Moore M M, Harrington E, Rock W P.
Factors affecting friction in the pre-adjusted appliance.
Eur J Orthod.
2004;
26
579-583
- 44
Michelberger D J, Eadie R L, Faulkner M G, Glover K E, Prasad N G, Major P W.
The friction and wear patterns of orthodontic brackets and archwires in the dry state.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2000;
118
662-674
- 45
Kapur R, Sinha P K, Nanda R S.
Frictional resistance in orthodontic brackets with repeated use.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
1999;
116
400-404
- 46
Saunders C R, Kusy R P.
Surface topography and frictional characteristics of ceramic brackets.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
1994;
106
76-87
- 47
Tanne K, Matsubara S, Hotei Y, Sakuda M, Yoshida M.
Frictional forces and surface topography of a new ceramic bracket.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
1994;
106
273-278
- 48
Tselepis M, Brockhurst P, West V C.
The dynamic frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
1994;
106
131-138
- 49
Bazakidou E, Nanda R S, Duncanson Jr M G, Sinha P.
Evaluation of frictional resistance in esthetic brackets.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
1997;
112
138-144
- 50
Harradine N W, Birnie D J.
The clinical use of Activa self-ligating brackets.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
1996;
109
319-328
- 51
Kusy R P.
Influence of force systems on archwire-bracket combinations.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2005;
127
333-342
G. A. Thorstenson
3M-Unitek · Senior Product Development Engineer
2724 South Peck Road
Monrovia, CA 91016
USA
Phone: 0 01/6 26/5 74 44 94
Fax: 0 01/6 26/5 74 48 76
Email: gathorstenson@mmm.com
